Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Abdimas Sangkabira
Suyono
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Materials Science & Nanotechnology Physics Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PELATIHAN PELAYANAN PRIMA ASPEK TANGGUNG JAWAB (ACCOUNTABILITY) BAGI TENAGA KEPENDIDIKAN (TENDIK) PROGRAM VOKASI UNIVERSITAS NEGERI SURABAYA Suyono; Fawaidul Makkiyah; Aminah Nudya; Ramadhan Maruta Pradhana; Estika Fitriyanti
Jurnal Abdimas Sangkabira Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Abdimas Sangkabira, Juni 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Diploma III Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/abdimassangkabira.v2i2.87

Abstract

Pelayanan prima merupakan sebuah kebutuhan demi kelangsungan sebuah organisasi/ lembaga/instansi, dalam pelatihan ini menitikberatkan pelayanan prima pada aspek bertanggung jawab (accountability). Aspek ini sangat penting karena tangung jawab merupakan bentuk kesadaran melaksanakan kewajiban. Dengan pelatihan ini diharapkan peserta dapat memahami dan mengetahui aspek bertanggung jawab dalam pekerjaan, yang kemudian diterapkan dalam melaksanakan pekerjaan sehari-hariya. Pelatihan dilaksanakan menggunakan 2 (dua) model yaitu sinkronus (via zoom meeting) dan asinkronus (via group WA dan google drive). Untuk mengetahui pemahaman peserta terhadap materi pelatihan dilakukan pre test terlebih dahulu, pada akhir sesi pelatihan dilakukan post-test. Hasil yang diperoleh ada perubahan yang signifikan pada pemahaman dan pengetahuan peserta terhadap materi yang disampaikan.
Development of Argumentation Skills Test Instruments on Buffer Solutions in Daily Life Lilla Pangestu Harwyandani; Suyono
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 12 (2023): December
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4725

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop a valid and reliable instrument for testing argumentation skills in buffer solutions in daily life. Argumentation skill test instruments are reviewed from theoretical validity (content and construct), empirical validity, and reliability. Development of argumentation skill test instruments using the ADDIE development model with stages: (1) analysis; (2) design; (3) development; (4) implementation; and (5) evaluation. This research was carried out until the initial implementation and then an evaluation was carried out. The argumentation skill test instrument that has been designed is then tested for theoretical validity through expert judgment involving three validators. The argumentation skill test instrument has criteria of theoretical validity if each statement has a mode ≥ 4 with valid categories. After being declared theoretically valid, argumentation skill test instruments are implemented to learners. The results of the argumentation skill test instrument are then analyzed to determine empirical validity and reliability. The results showed that the argumentation skill test instrument was declared theoretically valid where each statement had a mode of 5 with a very valid category. The test instrument is declared empirically valid where each question item has a consecutive calculated r value of 0.807; 0.879; 0.911; 0.911 is declared valid with r count > r table (0.468). The reliability of the argumentation skill test instrument of 0.876 is declared reliable with a r count > r table (0.468).
Development of Argumentation Skills Assessment Instruments on Buffer Solution Material Fitria Rahmatul Ula; Suyono
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 12 (2023): December
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.4760

Abstract

This research aims to produce a qualified argumentation skill assessment according the criteria of validity and reliability. This research is a development research with the ADDIE model whose implementation is limited to the pilot implementation and the evaluation formative evaluation. The subject of this research was an argumentation skills assesment in buffer solutions implemented in 18 students grade XI of SMA Trensains Tebuireng. The research instruments are review sheets, validation sheets, and argumentation skill test sheets. The results of content validity gain a mode with scores of 4 and 5 with valid and very valid criteria. In the construct aspect, gain a mode with a score of 5 with very valid criteria. The empirical validity result of the five questions in order is 0.791; 0.876; 0.961; 0.927; and 0.871. The calculated value appropriate with the criteria of rcalculate > rtable so that it can be declared valid. The value of reliability obtained 0.922 is greater than the rtable which is 0.468. With such results, the instrument can be declared reliable. Based on the results of the analysis, the argumentation skill assessment instrument is qualified to be used to measure students' argumentation skills on buffer solution material.
Co-Authors Aminah Nudya Estika Fitriyanti Fawaidul Makkiyah Fitria Rahmatul Ula Lilla Pangestu Harwyandani Ramadhan Maruta Pradhana