Sugeng Hadi Purnomo
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN KLUB SEPAK BOLA TERHADAP PEMAIN SEPAK BOLA DI MASA PANDEMI COVID Achmad Abdul Malik; Sugeng Hadi Purnomo
COURT REVIEW Vol 2 No 04 (2022): ILMU HUKUM
Publisher : COMMUNITY OF RESEARCH LABORATORY SURABAYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Wabah Virus Covid 19 datang membawa dampak yang sanggat tinggi di Dunia, yang mana berimbas terhadap perekonomian yang ada di dunia. Indonesia juga terpapar akan wabah ini yang berimbas perekonomian menjadi menurun . Dampak dari wahab ini menjadi ketentuan akan Pandemi yang terhadap klub sepak bola di Indonesia. Sepak Bola sendiri termasuk olahraga yang banyak di kaitkan dengan hubungan kerja antara pemain professional dan klub sepak bola professional, yang mana menghasilkan timbulnya hak kerja dan kewajiban yang telah disepakati dalam kontrak kerja tersebut. Permasalahan yang hadir di tatkala pandemi Covid 19 memakasa kompetisi sepak bola di Indoensia ditunda. PSSI sebagai asosiasi sepak bola di Indonesia mengeluarkan surat yang mana terdapat penundaan Liga 1 dan Liga 2 . Pengambilan putusan ini beralasan dalam keadaan darurat atau yakni biasa disebut dengan Force Majeure. Di dalam surat keputusan tersebut yang dikeluarkan pleh PSSI terdapat Poin tentang Pemotongan gaji yang sebesar 25 persen, yang mana tidak disambut baik oleh pemain sepak bola sebagai pekerja. Ketentuan yang ada dalam aturan FIFA sudah dijelaskan bahwa aturan Gaji yang bisa di atur antara Pemain Sepak Bola Profesional dan Klub tersebut. Wanprestasi timbul akan tidak terpenuhinya hak-hak pemain sepak bola dalam keadaan force Majeure Karna itu menjadi suatu permasalahan hukum antara ketentuan Perjanjian kerja antara Pemain Sepak bola dan Sepak Bola Profesional yang mana menjadi Hak dari Pemain untuk mendapat ketentuan Hukum yang tetap.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP SERIKAT PEKERJA BERDASARKAN UNDANG UNDANG NO 21 TAHUN 2000 DAN UNDANG UNDANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Yanu Ferry Mulyono; Sugeng Hadi Purnomo
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i3.67

Abstract

In carrying out and carrying out the development of a company there must be several factors such as capital, nature, and labor factors. In the course of history, it has been proven that the role of trade unions/labor unions in fighting for the rights of their members is very large, so that workers/labourers have felt the benefits of an independent and consistent trade union/labor union organization in fighting for workers' rights. In this paper, the author uses a normative research method that examines law from an internal perspective with the object of research being legal norms. One form of protection for workers is a trade union or labor union. Another function of the trade/labor union is as a party to the settlement of industrial disputes, namely differences of opinion which result in a conflict between the entrepreneur or a combination of employers and workers/labor or a trade/labor union due to disputes over rights, disputes over interests, and disputes over termination of employment. and disputes between trade unions/labor unions in only one company. Here the existence of law is only as a tool to secure the power of the owners of capital under the guise of moralists. It is not only the law that is used as a mere tool, but the role of the government, which should carry out the functions of supervision, prosecution, and the function of setting policies, cannot act as it should. It seems that the law which was originally used as a means of control cannot be used optimally in serving the interests of the community, and especially for workers who want to uphold the law (the rule of law). Here the effectiveness (enforcement) of the law begins to be questioned, and in particular the level of success in providing services to the industrial community
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA YANG TIDAK MEMENUHI STANDAR PROTOKOL KESEHATAN COVID-19 MENURUT PERATURAN WALI KOTA SURABAYA NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2021 Fajar Maoke Subroto; Sugeng Hadi Purnomo
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i3.70

Abstract

Various strategic steps have been taken by the Surabaya city government to suppress the spread of the deltacron variant of Covid-19 both in the issuance of individual and business actor regulations. The regulation is in the form of Surabaya Mayor Regulation Number 10 of 2021 concerning the implementation of health protocols in order to prevent and break the chain of spread of Covid-19 in the city of Surabaya. However, there are still many business actors in the city of Surabaya who do not comply with and implement health protocols in accordance with the Mayor's Regulation. The formulation discussed in this study is how law enforcement against business actors according to Surabaya Mayor Regulation Number 10 of 2021 and what are the obstacles in law enforcement against business actors according to Surabaya Mayor Regulation Number 10 of 2021. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method using a qualitative approach. The result of this study was the business actor Warkop S who violated article 7 paragraphs 2 and 3 with administrative sanctions in the form of an administrative fine of Rp. 500,000.00 (five hundred thousand rupiah), the manager of the Escobar discotheque violated article 32 with administrative sanctions in the form of revoking the tourism business register license and the manager of the Tunjungan Plaza Surabaya shopping center violated article 7 paragraph 11 with administrative sanctions in the form of a written reprimand and an administrative fine of Rp. 25,000,000.00 (twenty-five million rupiah). The obstacles in law enforcement in this Mayor's Regulation are the lack of awareness of business actors and economic reasons