Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Indonesian Journal of International Law Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Wahyu Wiriadinata
Kejaksaan Agung RI
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
MASALAH MAFIA PERADILAN DAN KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Wiriadinata, Wahyu
Syiar Hukum Vol 12, No 1 (2010): Syiar Hukum
Publisher : LPPM Unisba

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The terminology mafia or Cosa Nostra derived from the Italian term with a negative sense that means an activity of organized crime networks.  Furthermore, the terminology of mafia in courts has been rose in Indonesia since the new order era and increasingly in the reform era.  Such terminology can be defined as an organized activity performs in court from the beginning stages of investigation until the investigation, prosecution and execution, either in criminal, civil, or state administration court.  In its activities, the Mafioso (people who act mafia in courts), often use an unlawful act such as bribery, by giving a gratuity, to the law enforcement officers on purpose to influence their decisions to fulfill the wishes of the Mafioso.  What such Mafioso done is an action of corruption. This research focuses on the problem of mafia in courts and corruption and its impact to the law enforcement purposes that are achieving legal certainty and justice in society, and some ways to combat them.
Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Wiriadinata, Wahyu
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (447.952 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

This paper was intended to answer a question on the extent of the effectiveness of a reversal burden of proof as stipulated in positive (prevailing) Indonesia law, that is, as provided for in Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption Crime. Then, a problem that rose next was: could the application of reversal burden of proof in proving a corruption crime case prevent or reduce or even eliminate totally corruption crimes in Indonesia? This research built on a theoretical frame of thought from Roscoe Pound, who maintains that law is a tool of social engineering. This concept was cited by Muchtar Kusumaatmadja, who adapted it to Indonesia conditions and transformed it to be law as a social engineering medium.  Law should be made as a medium of reforming and resolving all problems that emerge in community, including corruption crimes. One of the things to reform is the law of proof system, that is, from a conventional proof system to a reversal system. This paper was written by a juridical-normative method, that is, by studying legislations, both contained in laws and in literature/books on legal science, particularly legislations relating to reversal burden of proof. Then, the results, in a form of juridical aspect, were written in a descriptive-analytical form. The conclusion of this research was  an answer to the problems put forward above, that is: Corruption crimes have    been occurring continuously till now in Indonesia. Thus, Law Number 31 of 1999, Article 37, has not been effective yet in eradicating corruption crimes. Therefore, it needs to apply a pure reversal burden of proof by avoiding the incidence of bureaucratic chaos.
CORRUPTION AND REVERSAL BURDEN OF PROOF Wiriadinata, Wahyu
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (334.286 KB)

Abstract

This paper, entitled Corruption and Reversal Burden of Proof, was intended to deal with a question on the extent of the effectiveness of a reversal burden of proof as stipulated in positive (applicable) Indonesia law, that is, as provided for in Law Number 31 of 1999 on Eradication of Corruption Crime. Then, a problem that rose next was: could the application of reversal burden of proof in proving a corruption crime case prevent or reduce or even eliminate totally corruption crimes in Indonesia? This research built on a theoretical frame of thought from Roscoe Pound, who maintains that law is a tool of social engineering. This concept was cited by Muchtar Kusumaatmadja, who adapted it to Indonesia conditions and adjusted it to be law as a social engineering medium. Engineering is meant here as a transformation of the thinking ways of people from traditional thinking ways to modern ones. Law should be made as a means in resolving the entire problems that emerge between and among community, including corruption crimes. One of the things that needs to be changed is a law of proof law system, that is, from a conventional proof system to be a reversal one. This paper was written by a juridical-normative method, that is, by studying legislations, be they are contained in laws and those contained in literature/books on legal science, particularly legislations related to reversal burden of proof. Then, the results, in a form of juridical aspect, was written in a descriptiveanalytical form. The overall conclusion of this research was an answer of the problems posed above, that is: Corruption crimes have been continuously occurring till now in Indonesia. Thus, Law Number 31 of 1999, particularly Article 37, has not been effective yet in eradicating corruption crimes.
PEMBALIKAN BEBAN PEMBUKTIAN PADA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (REVERSAL BURDEN OF PROOF ON CORRUPTION) Wiriadinata, Wahyu
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 9, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Juni 2012
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v9i2.392

Abstract

Tulisan berjudul Korupsi dan Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian bertujuan untukmenjawab pertanyaan sampai sejauh mana efektifitas sistem pembuktianterbalik sebagaimana yang diatur dalam hukum positif Indonesia yaitu dalamUndang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak PidanaKorupsi. Kemudian pertanyaan yang timbul berikutnya adalah; apakahpenerapan sistem pembuktian terbalik dalam pembuktian perkara tindak pidanakorupsi dapat mencegah atau mengurangi bahkan menghilangkan tindak pidanakorupsi di Indonesia secara tuntas. Penelitian ini bertolak dari kerangkapemikiran teoritis Roscoe Pound yang mengemukakan tentang hukum sebagaialat pembaharuan masyarakat: Law as a tool of social engineering, hukum sebagaialat pembaharuan masyarakat. Konsep ini dilansir oleh Muchtar Kusumaatmadjadan disesuaikan dengan kondisi Indonesia menjadi hukum sebagai saranapembaharuan masyarakat. Pembaharuan maksudnya ialah memperbaharui caraberfikir masyarakat dari cara berfikir tradisional kepada cara berfikir modern.Hukum harus bisa dijadikan sarana untuk memecahkan semua problem yangada di dalam masyarakat termasuk masalah tindak pidana korupsi. Salah satuhal yang harus diperbaharui adalah sistem hukum pembuktiannya, yaitu darisistem pembuktikan yang konvensional menjadi sistem pembuktian terbalik.Tulisan ini disusun dengan metode penulisan yuridis normatif yaitu denganmempelajari peraturan perundang-undangan baik yang ada dalam undangundang itu sendiri maupun yang ada dalam literatur/buku ilmu pengetahuanhukum, khususnya perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan sistempembuktian terbalik. Kemudian hasilnya yang berupa aspek yuridis dituangkandalam bentuk deskriptif analitis. Adapun kesimpulan dari tulisan ini merupakanjawaban atas masalah-masalah yang timbul di atas, yaitu : Bahwa tindak pidanakorupsi di Indonesia sampai saat ini masih tetap terjadi. Sehingga, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Pasal 37 belum efektif dalam memberantas tindakpidana korupsi.
KEHUTANAN DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF EKONOMI, EKOSISTEM DAN HUKUM (FORESTS IN INDONESIA IN PERSPECTIVE ECONOMIC, LEGAL AND ECOSYSTEM) Wiriadinata, Wahyu
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 9, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2012
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v9i1.382

Abstract

Hutan dan kehutanan merupakan sektor strategis, karena hutan di Indonesiamerupakan paru-paru dunia dan dapat menjaga keseimbangan ekosistem.Rusaknya hutan di Indonesia dapat mengganggu dan menimbulkan rusaknyalingkungan hidup. Kenyataannya hutan di Indonesia khususnya di Kalimantantelah menyusut dan rusak. Heterogenitas hayatinya pun menyusut pula. Halini disebabkan karena peladangan rakyat berpindah, penebangan/ pembalakanliar, penebangan oleh pemegang Hak Pengelolaan Hutan (HPH) illegal danpembakaran hutan.
Komisi Yudisial dan Pengawasan Hakim di Indonesia Wiriadinata, Wahyu
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 48 No 2 (2014)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v48i2.128

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to find out the effectiveness of Judicial Commission in supervising judges in Indonesia. The research method used was a normative legal/juridical-normative method. Data obtained was analyzed by a descriptive-qualitative method. From the research results it was found that the role of Judicial Commission in supervising the judges was not implemented effectively. The reasons were, among others, the Judicial Commission has neither an authority to impose itself any administrative punishment nor an investigatory authority over those judges who allegedly have committed a crime.
Co-Authors