Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis
Sutiarnoto
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Akta Perjanjian Jual Beli Rumah yang Dikeluarkan Berdasarkan Keterangan Palsu oleh Para Pihak : (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Nomor 433/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Mdn) Devira Ramadhani; Hasim Purba; Sutiarnoto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 9 (2025): Tema Hukum Agraria dan Pertanahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1369

Abstract

A notary’s official duties and authority are not solely for personal interest, but also serve the public interest. A notary is obligated to ensure the truthfulness of the deeds they draw up. Therefore, a notary is expected to act with honestly, fairness and transparency in preparing authentic deeds to safeguard all parties directly involved. This study employs a normative legal research method, using primary, secondary, and teriary legal materials, analyzed qualitatively. In the Courd Decision Number 433/Pdt.G/2021/ PN Mdn, the panel of judges considered that if a notary is proven to have knowingly or negligently include false information in a deed, this contitues both a violation of the notarical code of ethics and unlawful act. As a concequence, the notarial deed in question, being based on false statements, in declrared null and void by law.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris dan Kreditur dalam Pembuatan Akta Autentik: Studi Putusan Nomor :1048/PK/PDT/2022 Eklesia Novita Alverin Siagian; Hasim Purba; Sutiarnoto
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1404

Abstract

A notary is a Public Official who is authorized to make Authentic Deeds. Notary in carrying out his/her position as a public official, when making a deed may include data or information originating from a fake letter/document into the deed. This incident can have legal consequences for both the deed made and the Notary who made the deed. The problem in this study is the unlawful act committed by the notary and the creditor in making an authentic deed. The Notary's liability for the authentic deed is in accordance with the decision. The research method used in this study is the type of Normative Juridical research. Normative Legal Research is a process of determining legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines to answer the legal problems faced. The Notary's liability in the event of an Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) on a deed depends on the problem at hand. If the Notary is proven to have committed an Unlawful Act together with one of the Applicants, then the Notary and the Applicant will bear all losses incurred on the deed, then the liability for the unlawful act is not only limited to liability for losses but also criminal liability.
Kedudukan Hukum Klausula “Penyerahan dan Pengalihan Jaminan” Pada Akta Pemberian Jaminan dan Kuasa Pada Bank Swasta di Medan Jesline Arsjad; Sutiarnoto; Suhaidi Suhaidi
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 4 (2025): Tema Hukum Perdata dan Kenotariatan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.1632

Abstract

Banks as financial institutions play an important role in channeling credit to the public with collateral to guarantee debt repayment. In practice, a private bank in Medan uses a Guarantee and Power of Attorney (PJDK) deed in take over credit schemes to bind certificated land rights as collateral. Juridical empirical research shows that using PJDK deeds deviates from the principles of Law No. 4 of 1996 on Mortgage Rights, which establishes mortgage rights as the sole security institution for registered land rights. Consequently, binding through PJDK does not fulfill the principles of legal certainty and creates risks of legal uncertainty for debtors and weak executorial power for creditors over collateral objects bound through PJDK deeds.
Co-Authors Devira Ramadhani Eklesia Novita Alverin Siagian Hasim Purba Jesline Arsjad Suhaidi Suhaidi