Evi E. Masengi
Universitas Negeri Manado

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

ANALYSIS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCHIVES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OF THE SHIP OWNED BY THE CLASS II BITUNG PLP BASE Fahmi Rahmat Afandi; Evi E. Masengi; Steven V. Tarore
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21215572

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the development of a ship archives management system at the Bitung Class II PLP Base and identify inhibiting factors in its development. Ship archives management plays a strategic role in supporting orderly administration, shipping safety, legal compliance, and accountability in the implementation of state duties in the maritime sector. This study uses a qualitative approach with a focus on the development of a ship archives management system at the Bitung Class II PLP Base. Data collection techniques were carried out through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis was conducted descriptively qualitatively through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The research study uses a public administration perspective and archives management theory that emphasizes the importance of effectiveness, efficiency, accountability, transparency, and archives management based on the archives life cycle. The results of the study indicate that the development of a ship archives management system at the Bitung Class II PLP Base has not been running optimally. The patterns and mechanisms of archives management still tend to be manual, not standardized, and have not fully implemented the complete archives life cycle. The implemented archiving system is also not fully in accordance with national archival regulations and standards, especially in the implementation of SOPs, archive retention schedules, and the use of electronic archives. Furthermore, limited human resources, infrastructure, and the lack of integrated information technology systems contribute to the low effectiveness of archives management. This study also found that factors inhibiting the development of a ship's archives management system include structural and institutional barriers, human resource and organizational culture barriers, and technical and technological barriers.
THE DPRD'S SUPERVISORY FUNCTION IN MANAGING THE REGIONAL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE BUDGET (APBD) IN MIMIKA REGENCY Qoenchy Way Numbery; Evi E. Masengi; Jetty E.H. Mokat
Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : PT. Radja Intercontinental Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21158146

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the implementation of the Regional People's Representative Council (DPRD) oversight function on the management of the Regional Revenue and Expenditure Budget (APBD) in Mimika Regency and identify factors that influence the effectiveness of the implementation of the oversight function. The research method used is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. Research data were obtained through interviews, observations, and documentation. Research informants were selected using a purposive sampling technique consisting of DPRD leaders, commission leaders, and members of the Mimika Regency DPRD involved in the APBD oversight process. Data analysis was carried out through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, as well as drawing conclusions and verification. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of the Mimika Regency DPRD's oversight function on APBD management has been carried out at the planning, implementation, and accountability stages of the budget. However, the effectiveness of oversight has not been optimal. At the planning stage, political interests still dominate in the discussion and determination of budget priorities. At the implementation stage, oversight faces various obstacles such as limited human resource competency, lack of supporting data, and technical and administrative obstacles. Meanwhile, at the accountability stage, discussion of financial reports and follow-up of recommendations from oversight results have not been carried out optimally. Supporting factors for the implementation of the oversight function include a clear legal basis, an adequate DPRD institutional structure, and regulatory support for regional financial management. Inhibiting factors include limited human resource capacity, political interference, low information transparency, and limited facilities and infrastructure to support oversight.