Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Pidana Indonesia
Putu Ayu Veguita Putri Ningsih
Universitas Pancasila
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementasi Perlindungan Upah Terhadap Sengketa Wanprestasi Pekerja Bangunan di Indonesia Pradya Muharam Andika; Putu Ayu Veguita Putri Ningsih; Muhammad Arvin Wicaksono
COMSERVA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/comserva.v2i1.210

Abstract

Problems with workers/laborers still often occur in various sectors in Indonesia, from all existing sectors, the construction sector is one of the largest absorbers of labor which is a concern for workers/laborers whether their rights and obligations have been implemented and fulfilled. Of the many problems in the construction sector, there is a problem that can be said to be at the core of life rather than the workers themselves, namely wages. Why wages have become a problem that is certainly a thing of the past but is still happening today. Because wages are a right that must be obtained by a worker, especially construction workers, the economic wealth of a construction worker also depends on how great the graduates or skills are and the size of the project. Of the many cases that occurred, there were construction workers who really only relied on one project for the survival of the workers and their families. In this case there is legal protection regarding this matter and is seen from the civil aspect. From the basic agreement to the court mechanism for cases or disputes over these rights.
Esensi dan Eksistensi Putusan Pengadilan Perilaku Hakim Menerima Suap: Kajian Teori Dekonstruksi Derrida Kritik Prosedural: The Essence and Existence of Court Decisions: Judges' Behavior in Accepting Bribes: A Study of Derrida's Deconstruction Theory, Procedural Criticism Putu Ayu Veguita Putri Ningsih; Abdul Rahman
Jurnal Hukum Pidana Indonesia Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi Indonesia (APSERHUPIKI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Judges are symbols of integrity, neutrality, and objectivity in the courts. However, when a judge accepts a bribe, the act can undermine the principles of value as a judge, and the bribe has the potential to influence legal decisions that should be based on evidence, facts, and authoritative/juridical texts. The impact of judges accepting bribes is detrimental to the judicial system, as bribery can certainly harm public trust in the judicial system and compromise the integrity of the judiciary. The purpose of the research is to analyze the form of justice to the aggrieved party of the court decision due to bribery to the panel of judges based on Derrida's Deconstruction theory. The research method used is normative juridical, an approach by studying the provisions and rules in the form of legal rules or legal provisions along with existing legal principles. The phenomenon of judges accepting bribes, the need for firm and effective anti-corruption decision-making, the establishment of an independent supervisory system, the imposition of strict sanctions on judges proven to accept bribes, and increasing the integrity of judges through ethics training and character assessment, stopping the culture of bribery in judges is an important step towards a fair and transparent judiciary. Society needs to work together to eradicate corruption in the justice system for the sake of justice.
Co-Authors Abdul Rahman Muhammad Arvin Wicaksono Pradya Muharam Andika