Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal TAMWIL: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah (Jisrah)
Aprina Chintya
IAIN Batusangkar
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
URGENSI KLAUSUL PEMILIHAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARI’AH DALAM KONTRAK Aprina Chintya
Tamwil Vol 8, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : IAIN Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/jtm.v8i1.5726

Abstract

Perkembangan ekonomi syari’ah di Indonesia yang sangat pesat juga berpeluang terhadap meningkatnya jumlah sengketa ekonomi syari’ah. Oleh sebab itu, pemilihan bentuk penyelesaian sengketa saat pembuatan kontrak akan berpengaruh terhadap bentuk penyelesaian yang akan digunakan para pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas urgensi klausul pemilihan penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syari’ah dalam kontrak Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif-empiris yang bersifat deskriptif analitis. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui dokumentasi, dan dianalisis dengan menafsirkan dan membangun pernyataan yang terdapat dalam dokumen berupa teori, makna dan substansi dari berbagai literatur, serta pendapat para pakar yang berkaitan  sehingga mendapatkan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa klausul pemilihan bentuk penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syari’ah ini sangat urgen untuk dilakukan dan dimasukkan ke dalam kontrak karena mandatory consequences dan penetapkan prosedur dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syari’ah yang terjadi
MENERJEMAHKAN KEMASLAHATAN DALAM PUTUSAN (Studi Terhadap Putusan Verstek Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Sijunjung) Aprina Chintya
JISRAH: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Syariah Vol 4, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Batusangkar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31958/jisrah.v4i2.8360

Abstract

The authority to adjudicate shari'ah economic cases has existed since 2006 but the Sijunjung Religious Court will only accept shari'ah economic cases in 2021. The decision was handed down in a verstek and inkracht manner, but Defendant did not carry out the decision voluntarily, so Plaintiff can submit an execution to the Sijunjung Religious Court. It's just that, if the guarantee is in the form of a fiduciary and has been transferred, then the decision that has been handed down by the judge is not carried out. Meanwhile, if the Plaintiff submits an execution and it turns out that the execution cannot be carried out, then this judge's decision does not benefit the Plaintiff. The type of research used is normative-empirical legal research with a qualitative approach. Primary data sources were obtained from sharia economic judges at the Sijunjung Religious Court. While secondary data sources, the authors obtained documentation data of the Sijunjung Religious Court, the Case Tracing Information System (SIPP) of the Sijunjung Religious Court. Techniques in data collection used in this study were interviews and documentation. The data analysis used in this study is an interactive model analysis from Miles and Huberman which divides the analysis into three parts, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions or data verification. Based on the research that has been done, the judge is the central point in decision-making. A good legal decision can be seen in the legal considerations. The legal considerations of the decision reflect the depth of the decision which is loaded with principles, theories, and legal arguments. In the absence of appeals and executions submitted by the parties, it shows that the verstek decision on the simple shari'ah economic lawsuit at the Sijunjung Religious Court has benefited the litigants.
Co-Authors