Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum Adigama Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Richard C. Adam
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences Other

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISA HUKUM ATAS TRANSAKSI GADAI SAHAM PERUSAHAAN PENANAMAN MODAL ASING DISERTAI PEMBERIAN KUASA ATAS SAHAM SEHUBUNGAN DENGAN LARANGAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE AGREEMENT DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG PENANAMAN MODAL Richard C. Adam
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 18, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/erahukum.v18i1.13738

Abstract

Foreign investors as foriegn shareholders who plan to conduct a foreign direct investment in Indonesia often face the legal facts that there is a limitation of percentage of shares ownership in the joint venture company which will be established with the Indonesian shareholders. Foreign investors aim to manage or control the joint venture company since the foreign investor deemed as the party who knows the best of the management of the factory and the Indonesian shareholders only serve as legal formality in order to fulfill the requirement of establishment of the joint venture company.  In the framework of complying with the said restriction of percentage of shares ownership then the foreign investor shall utilize the legal instrument such as nominee agreements in order to achieve the goals to control the joint venture company. Law Number 25 Year 2007 concerning Investment as amended by Law Number  11 Year 2020 concerning Works Creator has stipulated the restriction to foreign investors to make agreement or statement which states the shares ownership in the joint venture company is and on behalf of other persons. The  objective of the said restriction is to eliminate the ownership of joint venture companies by the form of “de yure'' to be owned by a person but by the form of “de facto'' to be owned or at least to be  possessed by another party.
Tuntutan Ganti Rugi Pemegang Saham Publik Akibat dari Manipulasi Pasar Ditinjau dari Hukum Pasar Modal (Studi Kasus PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero)) Timmy Setiajaya; Richard C. Adam
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Capital Market as one of the pillars of the national economy, has stakeholders from the wider community. This certainly affects the opening of potential law violations against the wider community. Market manipulation, as a form of capital market crime, is conceptually classified as actions carried out either directly or indirectly, which aim to provide false or misleading projections related to trading activities, market conditions, or stock prices on the Stock Exchange. This wide-open potential was proven in a concrete case, namely the PT Asuransi Jiwasraya (PT AJS) corruption case which caused losses to the state finances of IDR 16,400,000,000 (sixteen trillion four hundred million Rupiah), in which PT AJS deliberately committed manipulation of stock trading so that shares traded on the stock exchange increase significantly in a false and misleading projection. This stock trading manipulation is only a 'value on paper' whereas in reality, the company's performance and finances are getting worse. In the context of criminal liability, through Court Decision Number 34/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN. Jkt. Pst., the Defendants have been legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing the crime of corruption. Even though the Defendants were criminally held accountable, in the context of losses to public shareholders, namely the general public who invested their wealth in PT AJS, they have not received compensation for losses due to these criminal acts. Therefore, this paper will discuss how to restore the rights of public shareholders in terms of claims for compensation against PT AJS based on national capital market law.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR CREDITORS THROUGH THE ACTIO PAULIANA INSTITUTION IN CONNECTION WITH BANKRUPT ASSETS Danila Elfayet; Richard C. Adam
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i3.3059

Abstract

Actio Pauliana is an important legal instrument in the bankruptcy system, aimed at protecting the interests of creditors from the actions of debtors with bad intentions, such as the transfer of assets conducted before a bankruptcy declaration is made. This instrument allows creditors to annul legal acts of the debtor that could harm their rights, with the main principle being good faith. This article aims to analyze the application of actio pauliana in Indonesian bankruptcy law, focusing on the protection given to creditors in dealing with harmful transfers of debtor assets. This research uses a normative juridical approach, analyzing the legal provisions in the Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligation Law (UU Bankruptcy and PKPU) and its application in practice. The results of the research show that actio pauliana can be an effective tool in maintaining fairness and transparency in debt settlement; however, its application still requires improvements in terms of oversight and coordination between relevant parties such as commercial courts, curators, and creditors. The recommendation is to update the regulations related to actio pauliana to address new challenges in bankruptcy practice and ensure the continuation of legal protection for creditors.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditor Sehubungan dengan Obyek Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah dan Bangunan yang Menjadi Harta Pailit Developer Camelia, Andini; Richard C. Adam
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3051

Abstract

Dalam hal developer pailit, terdapat banyak pihak yang dirugikan. Terlebih lagi terhadap pembeli yang belum mendapatkan sertipikat kepemilikan. Apabila developer menjaminkan tanah perumahan pembeli untuk mendapatkan tambahan dana dalam pembangunannya. Maka permasalahan hukum nya menjadi kompleks, bank sebagai kreditor pemegang hak tanggungan atas tanah yang terikat dalam perjanjian kredit juga berusaha untuk mempertahankan haknya. Kasus tersebut terjadi kepada PT. Graha Cipta Suksestama dan PT. Niman Internusa dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 395K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan literatur studi kepustakaan dan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa status hukum objek perjanjian jual beli tanah dan bangunan menjadi hapus dan pembeli mengajukan diri sebagai kreditor konkuren. Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 395K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 belum mencerminkan adanya kepastian hukum. Jika pembeli mendasari gugatannya dengan SEMA No. 4 Tahun 2016, dalam hal developer pailit maka harus mengacu pada UU KPKPU yang peraturannya khusus.
Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Perjanjian Kemitraan dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Praktik Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Sola Kira, Joseph Hugo Vieri Iusteli; Richard C. Adam
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3762

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas penerapan asas kebebasan berkontrak dalam perjanjian kemitraan serta pengaruhnya terhadap praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Asas kebebasan berkontrak memungkinkan para pihak untuk menetapkan syarat perjanjian secara mandiri tanpa paksaan, namun pada praktiknya sering kali terjadi ketidakseimbangan dalam perjanjian kemitraan antara pelaku usaha besar dan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Melalui pendekatan yuridis normatif dan studi kasus, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa perjanjian kemitraan yang bersifat baku cenderung menekan pihak UMKM, menimbulkan praktik persaingan yang tidak sehat. Studi kasus pada Putusan KPPU No. 09/KPPU-K/2020 menunjukkan perlunya intervensi hukum dalam perjanjian baku untuk melindungi pihak yang lebih lemah. Dengan adanya kebijakan perlindungan terhadap UMKM, perjanjian kemitraan diharapkan dapat mengakomodasi prinsip kebebasan berkontrak yang lebih adil dan seimbang. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya revisi perjanjian yang mendukung persaingan usaha sehat sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999.
Co-Authors Camelia, Andini Danila Elfayet Sola Kira, Joseph Hugo Vieri Iusteli Timmy Setiajaya