Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Register : Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED

TEACHERS’ ELICTATION TECHNIQUES IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT SMK NEGERI 13 MEDAN Khairiana Fitri; Neni Afrida Harahap; Johannes Jefria Gultom
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1073.346 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v9i3.24664

Abstract

TEACHERS’ ELICTATION TECHNIQUES IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION AT SMK NEGERI 13 MEDAN *Khairiana Fitri **Neni Afrida Sari Harahap **Johannes Jefria Gultom Abstract This research was dealt with elicitation techniques used by the teacher in English Classroom Interaction. The objectives of this study were (1) to identify the subcategory of elicitation techniques used by the teacher in English classroom interaction at SMKN 13 Medan (2) to find out the reasons which affect the use of elicitation techniques in English classroom interaction at SMKN 13 Medan. A descriptive qualitative design was used in this study. The data were collected by recording the utterances of teacher. The data were analyzed by data condensation, data display, conclusion drawing/verification. (1) There were 259 elicitations used by the teacher in the classroom interaction. The subcategories that have been found in teacher utterances are elicitation for information, elicitation for confirmation, elicitation for agreement, elicitation for commitment, elicitation for repetition, and elicitation for clarification. (2) For the reasons which affect the use of elicitation techniques. There were six reasons, they were lack of skill and knowledge of teacher, lack confidence of students in class participation, passive recipient of information, reluctant students, large class size, and low level of learners. Meanwhile, the short duration of class and late arrival of students in class were not the reasons which affect the use of elicitation techniques. Keywords : Teachers’ Elicitation Techniques , Classroom Interaction, DescriptiveQualitative.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ON READING EXERCISES IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK “ BAHASA INGGRIS” FOR GRADE TEN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Chintia Theresia; Johannes Jefria Gultom; Tiarnita Maria Siregar
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 8, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (612.446 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v8i4.24677

Abstract

BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ON READING EXERCISES IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK “BAHASA INGGRIS” FOR GRADE TEN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS*Chintia Theresia**Johannes Jefria Gultom,S.Pd.,M.Hum.**Tiarnita Maria Sarjani Siregar,S.Pd.,M.Hum.ABSTRACTTheresia,Chintia. Registration Number: 216121006. Bloom’s Taxonomy on Reading Exercises inEnglish Textbook “Bahasa Inggris” for Grade Ten Senior High School. A Thesis, EnglishEducation Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts,Universitas Negeri Medan,2020.The purpose of this study was to find the types of reading exercises and the distribution of Bloom’s Taxonomy incognitive domain in the third revision of English Textbook for grade ten Senior High School students published byPusat Perbukuan dan Kurikulum . Based on Revised version of Bloom’s Taxonomy (2001) there are 3 domain inBloom Taxonomy such as the cognitive domain, affective domain and psychomotor domain. This study focused oncognitive domain. There are six level of cognitive domain; remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate andcreate. Based on Heaton Theory, there are 5 types of reading exercises. Namely, matching test, true false, multiplechoice, completion item, and open ended. This study used the qualitative method to solve the problems. The data ofthis study were taken from 172 questions from 30 reading exercises. For collecting the data this study used onetechnique, that is documentation. Analysis technique used which were data reduction, data displays and conclusiondrawing/ verification. The finding of this study are there are 43% for remember, 32% for understand, 5% for apply,15% for analyze, 3 % for evaluate, and 2 % for create. There are 3 of 5 types of question used in this textbook.Keywords : Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cognitive Domain, Questions, Reading,