Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ON READING EXERCISES IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK “ BAHASA INGGRIS” FOR GRADE TEN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS Chintia Theresia; Johannes Jefria Gultom; Tiarnita Maria Siregar
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 8, No 4 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (612.446 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v8i4.24677

Abstract

BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ON READING EXERCISES IN ENGLISH TEXTBOOK “BAHASA INGGRIS” FOR GRADE TEN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS*Chintia Theresia**Johannes Jefria Gultom,S.Pd.,M.Hum.**Tiarnita Maria Sarjani Siregar,S.Pd.,M.Hum.ABSTRACTTheresia,Chintia. Registration Number: 216121006. Bloom’s Taxonomy on Reading Exercises inEnglish Textbook “Bahasa Inggris” for Grade Ten Senior High School. A Thesis, EnglishEducation Study Program, Faculty of Languages and Arts,Universitas Negeri Medan,2020.The purpose of this study was to find the types of reading exercises and the distribution of Bloom’s Taxonomy incognitive domain in the third revision of English Textbook for grade ten Senior High School students published byPusat Perbukuan dan Kurikulum . Based on Revised version of Bloom’s Taxonomy (2001) there are 3 domain inBloom Taxonomy such as the cognitive domain, affective domain and psychomotor domain. This study focused oncognitive domain. There are six level of cognitive domain; remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate andcreate. Based on Heaton Theory, there are 5 types of reading exercises. Namely, matching test, true false, multiplechoice, completion item, and open ended. This study used the qualitative method to solve the problems. The data ofthis study were taken from 172 questions from 30 reading exercises. For collecting the data this study used onetechnique, that is documentation. Analysis technique used which were data reduction, data displays and conclusiondrawing/ verification. The finding of this study are there are 43% for remember, 32% for understand, 5% for apply,15% for analyze, 3 % for evaluate, and 2 % for create. There are 3 of 5 types of question used in this textbook.Keywords : Bloom’s Taxonomy, Cognitive Domain, Questions, Reading,
AN ANALYSIS OF HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL (HOTS) IN ENGLISH QUESTIONS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONAL EXAMINATION 2018/2019 Ade Dama Yanti; Rika Rika; Tiarnita Maria Siregar
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 9, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (548.701 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v9i3.24659

Abstract

AN ANALYSIS OF HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL (HOTS) IN ENGLISH QUESTIONS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONAL EXAMINATION 2018/2019 *Ade Dama Yanti **Rika, S.Pd., M.Hum. **Tiarnita Maria Sarjani Br. Siregar, S.Pd., M.Hum. ABSTRACT Ade Dama Yanti. 2161121001. An Analysis of High Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) in English Questions of Junior High School National Examination 2018/2019. A Thesis. English Education Program. State University of Medan, 2020. This study aimed to find out the level of thinking skills and to describe out the thinking skills distributed in English National Examination for Junior High School academic year 2018/2019 based on HOTS of Revised Taxonomy Bloom (2001). There are three level thinking skills in HOTS, the first is anyze skill which has the subskills of differentiating, organizing, and attributing. The second is evalute skill which has the subskills of checking and critiquing. The third is create skill which has the subskills of generating, planning, and producing. In solving the problems, this study used descriptive qualitative method. The data were obtained through documentation. There were four packages of the English National Examination which consisted of 50 questions in every package. The total of the questions were 200 questions. In analyzing the data, the researcher used the techniques of observation and the documentary analysis. The findings showed that the four packages applied analyze skill and evaluate skill of HOTS which were 18,5% of analyze skill and 4% of evaluate skill out of 200 questions. While for the distribution of the subskills, for the analyze skill had all the subskills except the differetiating skill and for the evaluate skill had all the subskills in the questions of the four packages. Keywords: English Questions, HOTS, National Examination