Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Tradisi Assuro Maca dalam Masyarakat di Kabupaten Gowa; Analisis Hukum Islam Ibrahim Ibrahim; Zulhas’ari Mustafa
Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/shautuna.v2i3.21354

Abstract

The main problem of this research is how is the process of acculturation between Assuro Maca and the teachings of Islamic law? What is the process of implementing Assuro Maca in Tanakaraeng Village? How do people view the Assuro Maca tradition? The type of research used is field research or Field Research, namely the author conducts research directly to the location and at the same time the researcher is directly involved with the object studied in the study, this type of research is descriptive qualitative, namely, the research is intended to understand phenomena or events regarding the traditions carried out by Research subjects produce descriptive data in the form of verbal information from several people who are considered more knowledgeable, as well as the behavior and objects observed. The results of this study indicate that the Assuro Maca tradition is one of a series of events that should not be missed, this is a tradition that cannot be denied that it is a cultural product created by Muslims themselves, while the others have no clear origin but all of them. rooted in Islam. This event is carried out as a form of gratitude to Allah SWT for His grace and blessings so that our sustenance will be smooth and never broken, and that's why this tradition also encourages prayer and asks for protection and safety in the world in the hereafter. The implication of this research is to explain the cultural values contained in the process of the Assuro Maca tradition to the people in the village of Tanakaraeng ke. Manuju District. Gowa
Peran Bawaslu Dalam Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara Pada Pilkada Di Kabupaten Bone (Analisis Siyasah Syar’iyyah) Ilhamzyah Sandrang; Usman Jafar; Zulhas’ari Mustafa
Lentera Jurnal Vol 1 No 2 (2025): Studi Islam Kontemporer: Pendekatan Interdisipliner terhadap Penelitian Teks, Huk
Publisher : Danudirja Setyabudi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64271/0ce8th93

Abstract

This thesis discusses the role of Bawaslu in maintaining the neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in regional elections in Bone Regency from the perspective of Siyasah Syar'iyyah. This study focuses on three main issues, namely: (1) The strategies implemented by Bawaslu in maintaining the neutrality of ASN. (2) The view of Siyasah Syar'iyyah on the neutrality of ASN in the context of supervision carried out by Bawaslu Bone Regency. This study uses a qualitative approach with descriptive analysis methods. The approaches used are theological-normative (sharia) and juridical-sociological. Data were collected from various sources such as Bawaslu Bone Regency, the Subdistrict Supervisory Committee (Panwascam), election observers, political parties, and community leaders. Data collection techniques included observation, interviews, and documentation, which were analyzed through the stages of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study show that: (1) Bawaslu's strategy in maintaining the neutrality of ASN is carried out through two main approaches, namely prevention and supervision. Prevention is carried out through socialization, distribution of appeal letters, and the use of social media, while supervision is carried out directly in the field and on the use of state or village facilities. (2) From the perspective of Siyasah Syar'iyyah, violations of neutrality by ASN are contrary to the principle of justice, which is one of the main pillars of Islamic government. Such violations not only cause harm to society but also violate the oath of office, which, according to Islamic law, must be obeyed. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of applying political ethics within the framework of Siyasah Syar'iyyah as a normative basis for maintaining the neutrality of civil servants. The government and Bawaslu are expected to increase transparency and accountability in the process of supervision and law enforcement by providing clear and detailed reports on each violation and its follow-up. This is important to strengthen public trust in the democratic process and the integrity of elections.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM TERHADAP PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN RINGAN Umar Laila; Kurniati; Zulhas’Ari Mustafa
Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/iqtishaduna.v7i2.65196

Abstract

Abstrak Keadilan restoratif telah menjadi alternatif dalam penanganan tindak pidana penganiayaan ringan di Indonesia, khususnya di institusi seperti kepolisian dan kejaksaan. Studi empiris menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme ini pada umumnya melibatkan mediasi antara pelaku, korban, dan tokoh masyarakat melalui forum seperti Rumah Restorative Justice, serta menawarkan keadilan yang lebih manusiawi dibandingkan proses litigasi formal. Di sisi hukum Islam, konsep ini sejalan dengan prinsip al‑‘afwu (pemaafan), al‑islah (perdamaian), dan diyat (kompensasi) sebagai bentuk restorative justice sejak sejarah awal syariah. Namun, implementasi di lapangan masih terkendala oleh ketidakjelasan standar biaya dan durasi mediasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesesuaian restorative justice dalam penganiayaan ringan dengan hukum pidana Islam, mengidentifikasi tantangan, serta merumuskan rekomendasi normatif agar praktik tersebut lebih adil, konsisten, dan sesuai koridor syariah. Menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dan studi kasus, hasil studi ini menunjukkan bahwa restorative justice modern memiliki basis teologis yang kuat dalam Islam dan memberikan peluang untuk integrasi yang harmonis dalam sistem hukum nasional. Kata kunci: keadilan restoratif; hukum pidana Islam; penganiayaan ringan; al-‘afwu; diyat. Abstract Restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach to handling minor assault cases in Indonesia, particularly within police and prosecutor institutions. Empirical studies indicate that this mechanism typically involves mediation among the perpetrator, victim, and community figures via platforms such as Restorative Justice Houses, offering a more humane form of justice compared to formal litigation. From the perspective of Islamic criminal law, this approach aligns with the principles of al-‘afwu (forgiveness), al-islah (reconciliation), and diyat (compensation) as core elements of restorative justice since the early era of Sharia. However, practical implementation faces obstacles such as unclear compensation standards and limited mediation duration. This study aims to analyze the compatibility of restorative justice in minor assault cases with Islamic criminal law, identify challenges, and formulate normative recommendations to ensure a more equitable, consistent practice within the framework of Sharia. Through a combined normative legal and case-based methodology, the findings indicate that modern restorative justice is grounded in Islamic theological principles and presents a promising avenue for harmonious integration within the national legal system. Keywords: restorative justice; Islamic criminal law; minor assault; al-‘afwu; diyat.
The Position of Testimony in the Court Evidentiary System: A Juridical-Normative Analysis of Indonesian Law and Islamic Courts Erniawati; Abdul Halim Talli; Zulhas’ari Mustafa; Mohamad Subli
BAYAN: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Nawa Edukasi Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Testimony constitutes an essential evidentiary instrument within Indonesian and Islamic judicial systems, yet its application encounters practical complexities. This research aims to analyze the position of testimony in court evidentiary systems through a juridical-normative approach by comparing Indonesian positive law and Islamic law. The method employed is normative juridical with qualitative analysis of legal norms, testimony concepts, and case studies. Research findings indicate that: (1) Testimony regulation in KUHAP adheres to the negative legal system, while Islamic judiciary implements testimony hierarchy based on case types with more rigid standards; (2) Validity requirements for testimony in positive law emphasize procedural-formal aspects, whereas Islamic law applies the principles of 'adalah and dhabt with comprehensive tazkiyah al-syuhud mechanism; (3) The evidentiary position of testimony in Indonesian system is flexible with Constitutional Court Decision No. 65/PUU-VIII/2010 expanding acceptance of testimonium de auditu, while Islamic system applies the principle of "dar'u al-hudud bi al-syubuhat" for maximum prudence. This research concludes that despite different approaches, both systems converge toward justice objectives through mutually complementary mechanisms within Indonesia's legal plurality context.