Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Syntax Transformation Notary Journal Journal of Social Research
Tjempaka Tjempaka
Universitas Tarumanagara
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
(RETRACTION) Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli Tanah yang Kehilangan Hak Akibat Jual Beli atas Tanah yang Pernah Menjadi Objek Sengketa Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Novia Gunawan; Tjempaka Tjempaka
Notary Journal Vol 1, No 2: October 2021
Publisher : Program Studi Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/nj.v1i2.3541

Abstract

(This article is retracted because of dupiclate publication)The land was the state's authority to govern the giving and use of land to the people so that the land would be used for the greatest measure of civic prosperity requiring a sure law and protection of the law among peoples. While wisdom regarding land civilty governed by the state exists in reality often does not establish order and certainty of law. For example the case example on ruling Supreme Court number 658 PK/Pdt/2017 in the two hedges of the same land as the different rights, Dirman was using the building rights and John as his property which turned John's property into an object of dispute at the State Enterprises Court. How can legal protection be provided for land buyers who lost their rights through land sale that was once an object of national governance court dispute at the State Enterprises Court? How would the deed of ownership of the deed of the land deed be formed between bacce and Gunadi and Gunadi and John? The authors examine the problem using normative legal methods and use interviews as backup data. Studies reveal that legal protection is obtained if land buyers can prove their rights in court and Land deed deed official only responsible for the purchase papers made between Gunadi and John because they were consciously created that the land was in dispute over the state governance court.Bahasa Indonesia Abstrak: Tanah merupakan kewenangan Negara untuk mengatur pemberian dan penggunaan tanah kepada masyarakat agar tanah dimanfaatkan bagi pencapaian sebesar-besar kemakmuran rakyat dengan tuntutan kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum antar masyarakat. Meskipun kebijaksanaan mengenai kemanfaatan tanah yang diatur oleh negara ada tetap saja dalam realita sering tidak terjadinya ketertiban dan kepastian hukum. Seperti contoh kasus pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 658 PK/Pdt/2017 yaitu terbitnya dua sertipikat atas tanah yang sama dengan hak yang berbeda, Dirman Pardosi dengan Hak Guna Bangunan dan John dengan Hak Miliknya yang ternyata tanah milik John sedang menjadi objek sengketa di PTUN. Bagaimana bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli tanah yang kehilangan hak akibat jual beli atas tanah yang pernah menjadi objek sengketa PTUN? Bagaimana bentuk tanggung jawab PPAT terhadap akta jual beli yang dibuat antara Bacce dengan Gunadi dan Gunadi dengan John Tandiari? Penulis meneliti masalah tersebut dengan menggunakan metode hukum normatif dan menggunakan wawancara sebagai data penunjang. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan bahwa perlindungan hukum akan didapatkan jika pembeli tanah dapat membuktikan hak mereka di Pengadilan dan PPAT bertanggung jawab hanya pada akta jual beli yang dibuat antara Gunadi dan John karena dibuat secara sadar bahwa tanah sedang dalam sengketa PTUN.
The Responsibility Of The National Land Agency For The Issuance Of Certificate Breakdown Whose Parent Certificate Has Not Been Split Altina Intan Nurfadila; Tjempaka Tjempaka
Jurnal Syntax Transformation Vol 4 No 9 (2023): Jurnal Syntax Transformation
Publisher : CV. Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jst.v4i9.815

Abstract

Multiple certificates, namely a plot of land that has more than one certificate, causing legal uncertainty for holders of land rights which is highly undesirable in land registration in Indonesia. The purpose of this study, among other things, is to find out and analyze the responsibility of the National Land Agency when it was discovered that there were multiple certificates based on Decree Number: 177/Pdt.G/2022/PN Tjk. The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach. This case of multiple certificates can occur because the main certificate has not been mapped, so when an online check is carried out through an application it cannot be read, resulting in the re-creation of the certificate either partially or wholly on the same land by another party. If there are several certificates, the responsibility of the National Land Agency is to assist in mediation between certificate holders. If it cannot be resolved through mediation, the National Land Agency will help direct it to a settlement in the District Court or State Administrative Court because it is the State Administrative Court or District Court that can decide whether or not the certificate is cancelled.
Position of the Deed of Grant Whose Object Violates the Absolute Rights (Legitieme Portie) of the Heirs Fatsya Gita Subagia; Tjempaka Tjempaka
Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): Journal of Social Research
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i11.1557

Abstract

A living person may give away their property by grant or gift instead of distributing it to their heirs through inheritance. When both the grantor and grantee are still alive, a grant is a legal action that aims to transfer ownership rights that are knowingly transferred to another party. Grants may be made to whoever the grantor chooses, but it must be stated that the grant's terms cannot be harmful to other people. The Burgerlijk Wetboek, or Civil Code, governs these issues. By being careful not to violate the legitimate component (absolute part). Problems with legal protection and legal repercussions for heirs about grants that hurt the absolute portion (Legitieme Portie) of the heirs will occur if they breach the law's restrictions. By looking into secondary data or library resources, the normative juridical research methodology was applied to create this paper. As a result of identifying the absolute portion (Legitieme Portie), as specified in Article 913 of the Civil Code, various provisions in the Civil Code (Burgerlijk Wetboek) have given the heirs legal protection. Then, if the heirs feel wronged by the grant or grant or based on a will or who has passed away, the legal implications of a grant deed that breaches Legitieme Portie be revoked.
Co-Authors Altina Intan Nurfadila Fatsya Gita Subagia Novia Gunawan