Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERANAN IBNU MUJAHID DALAM TERBENTUKNYA QIR?’AT SAB’AH: Kajian Kitab As-Sab’ah Fi Al-Qir?’ah Zuhrupatul Jannah
el-'Umdah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : UIN Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (483.513 KB) | DOI: 10.20414/el-umdah.v2i2.1694

Abstract

This paper discusses about the role of Ibn Mujahid and how hiseffortto format of the qir?‘ah sab'ah. Understanding, or at least knowing qir?'ah is an urgent matter, not only because qir?'ah is a scientific discipline of its own, but also because this science allows people who understand it to be able to explain some related scholarship, such as fiqh, law and interpretation itself. Based on this then the concepts of qir?‘ah sab'ah, qir?‘ah ‘asyr, and arba’ah‘ asyr emerge. Among the concepts above, which are widely known by the public are qir?‘ah sab’ah, seven variations of reading (al-Qir?‘ah al-Sab’ah). What a great attention of Ibn Mujahid to the science of qir?'at has led him to compose books that make it easy for the prosecutors to study different kinds of qir?'at in the Qur'an. The book what is meantion is al-Sab'ah fî al-Qir?’ah.
Hudā versus Maqāṣid? Teleological Competition in Al-Hidāyāt Al-Qur’aniyyah: Dirāsah Ta’shīliyyah (Vols. I–II) Muhammad Hariyadi; Zuhrupatul Jannah; Ainun Nadzifah; Zakiyatul Fitriyah
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7358

Abstract

Purpose oriented readings of the Qur’an often articulated through maqāṣid (objectives) have become increasingly visible in reform-oriented discourse, yet the scholarly status of maqāṣid Al-Qur’an remains contested and still in the making. Against this backdrop, Al-Hidāyāt Al-Qur’aniyyah, a large institutional initiative affiliated with Umm Al-QuraUniversity, proposes a guidance centered (hudā) program that systematizes verse level “guidance” (hidāyāt) as actionable outputs. This article offers a contrastive comparison between hudā  and maqāṣid centered programs using a qualitative, text centered approach. The primary corpus is Al-Hidāyāt Al-Qur’aniyyah: Dirāsah Ta’shīliyyah (Vols. I–II), read as the project’s programmatic self-articulation; the comparator corpus is maqāṣid Qur’ān programmatic literature, with particular reference to Al-Maqāṣid Al-Kubrā li-l-Qur’ān, which distinguishes major objectives from detailed Guidance (tafṣīlī/ʿamalī). The findings reconstruct four epistemological patterns in Al-Hidāyāt, hudā as telos, non-operationalization of a maqāṣid hierarchy, Salaf authorized epistemic layering, and an applicative output genre and show, via the comparator’s own taxonomy, how maqāṣid and hidāyāt differ in object of inquiry, scale, inferential routes, and extensibility. A worked textual example (Q 2:275–279) demonstrates how each program scales normative output from the same passage. The article contributes a comparator grounded framework for studying teleological competition in contemporary Qur’anic hermeneutics and highlights the growing role of institutional infrastructures in shaping exegetical authority.