Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis MADANI Abdimas | Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Zakiyatul Fitriyah
Universitas PTIQ Jakarta
Religion Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENINGKATAN PEMAHAMAN METODE TAFSIR BI AL-MA’TSÛR PADA MAHASISWA UNIVERSITAS PTIQ JAKARTA Kerwanto Kerwanto; Rahman Apandi; Azmi Ismail; EE Junaedi Sastradiharja; Zakiyatul Fitriyah
MADANI Abdimas : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): MADANI Abdimas | Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : MPP: Lembaga Penelitian Dan Studi Kebijakan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tafsir bi al-ma’tsûr is said tobe the most correct and safest interpretation methode to stay awake from slipping because it adheres to authoritative sources of interpretation. In its use, the term interpretation bi al-ma’tsûr is often used as an opponent for the interpretation of bi al-ra’yi (with reason). However, the dichotomy between the two becomes ambiguous, because of the overlap in the use of the two terms. This can be seen from the influence of the reasoning of the interpreters who are always present in interpreting the Qur'an even though they adhere to the traditions of interpretation, and the use of the term interpretation bi al-ma’tsûr does not yet have a clear procedur
Hudā versus Maqāṣid? Teleological Competition in Al-Hidāyāt Al-Qur’aniyyah: Dirāsah Ta’shīliyyah (Vols. I–II) Muhammad Hariyadi; Zuhrupatul Jannah; Ainun Nadzifah; Zakiyatul Fitriyah
Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis Vol. 27 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/qh.v27i1.7358

Abstract

Purpose oriented readings of the Qur’an often articulated through maqāṣid (objectives) have become increasingly visible in reform-oriented discourse, yet the scholarly status of maqāṣid Al-Qur’an remains contested and still in the making. Against this backdrop, Al-Hidāyāt Al-Qur’aniyyah, a large institutional initiative affiliated with Umm Al-QuraUniversity, proposes a guidance centered (hudā) program that systematizes verse level “guidance” (hidāyāt) as actionable outputs. This article offers a contrastive comparison between hudā  and maqāṣid centered programs using a qualitative, text centered approach. The primary corpus is Al-Hidāyāt Al-Qur’aniyyah: Dirāsah Ta’shīliyyah (Vols. I–II), read as the project’s programmatic self-articulation; the comparator corpus is maqāṣid Qur’ān programmatic literature, with particular reference to Al-Maqāṣid Al-Kubrā li-l-Qur’ān, which distinguishes major objectives from detailed Guidance (tafṣīlī/ʿamalī). The findings reconstruct four epistemological patterns in Al-Hidāyāt, hudā as telos, non-operationalization of a maqāṣid hierarchy, Salaf authorized epistemic layering, and an applicative output genre and show, via the comparator’s own taxonomy, how maqāṣid and hidāyāt differ in object of inquiry, scale, inferential routes, and extensibility. A worked textual example (Q 2:275–279) demonstrates how each program scales normative output from the same passage. The article contributes a comparator grounded framework for studying teleological competition in contemporary Qur’anic hermeneutics and highlights the growing role of institutional infrastructures in shaping exegetical authority.
Co-Authors Ainun Nadzifah Azmi Ismail EE Junaedi Sastradiharja Kerwanto Muhammad Hariyadi Rahman Apandi Zuhrupatul Jannah