Zaim Rais
UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY SCIENTIFIC/NON-SCIENTIFICTHINKING: OBJECTIVES AND ITS FUNCTIONS Diana Dwi Putri; Zaim Rais; Rocky Kurniawan
Jurnal Imam Bonjol: Kajian Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Edisi 2
Publisher : UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/jib.v4i2.79

Abstract

Abstract:  A scientific approach is an approach carried out by conducting research and research to obtain correct data and information. The factors that influence it are human curiosity, curiosity, all-around asking, all-thinking, and likes to seek the truth. Information in preparing a theoretical basis can be obtained from books, reports on other people's research results—interviews with experts, or through direct observation in the field. The theoretical base is useful as a base for drawing hypotheses. And a hypothesis is a provisional or presumptive answer to the problem or question raised based on the framework/ theoretical basis's conclusions. It is said to be a quick answer because this hypothesis only contains logical and theoretical. After all, it has not been proven through experiments. Research is essentially an activity or a systematic process to solve problems done by applying scientific methods. The purpose of all scientific endeavors is to explain, predict, and control phenomena. The purpose is based on the assumption that all behavior and events are impacts and that all results have probable causes.Keywords: Scientific,  Thinking Patterns, ResearchAbstrak:  Pendekatan ilmiah adalah pendekatan yang dilakukan dengan melakukan penelitian untuk memperoleh data dan informasi yang benar. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya adalah keingintahuan manusia, keingintahuan yang serba bisa, serba berpikir, dan suka mencari kebenaran. Informasi dalam menyusun landasan teori dapat diperoleh dari buku, laporan hasil penelitian orang lain,wawancara dengan pakar, atau melalui observasi langsung di lapangan. Landasan teori berguna sebagai dasar untuk menggambar hipotesis, dan hipotesis adalah jawaban sementara atau dugaan atas masalah atau pertanyaan yang diajukan berdasarkan kesimpulan kerangka / landasan teori. Dikatakan sebagai jawaban yang cepat karena hipotesis ini hanya mengandung logika dan teoritis. Toh, itu belum dibuktikan lewat eksperimen. Penelitian pada hakikatnya merupakan kegiatan atau proses sistematis untuk menyelesaikan masalah yang dilakukan dengan menerapkan metode ilmiah. Tujuan dari semua upaya ilmiah adalah untuk menjelaskan, memprediksi, dan mengendalikan fenomena. Tujuannya didasarkan pada asumsi bahwa semua perilaku dan peristiwa adalah sebuah dampak dan semua hasil memiliki kemungkinan penyebab.Kata Kunci: Ilmiah, Pola Berpikir, Penelitian
Impression Management of the Muslim Preacher in Indonesia Irta Sulastri; Zaim Rais; Bukhari Bukhari
Jurnal Dakwah Risalah Vol 33, No 2 (2022): December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jdr.v33i2.17045

Abstract

When delivering a presentation, a person will manage the impression that others have of him. In Indonesia, Islamic preachers also tend to their beliefs. Some preachers are well-liked by the congregation because of their ability to manage their image, whereas others are disliked or despised. Syafwan Diran is one notable Preacher in Padang, and his sermons are well-received by his congregation; thus, he is frequently invited to preach at events. This research explores the impression management performed by Syafwan Diran. It is qualitative research, with data gathered through observation and in-depth interviews with the informants. The results showed that Syafwan Diran managed his impression by presenting techniques created harmoniously when appearing in front of his congregation. He also has a reasonable manner and a commitment to preaching. Therefore, his preaching is well received and eagerly anticipated by his community.
Scientific Authority in Crisis: A Dialogical Reflection between Bruno Latour and Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas in The Post-Truth Era Rahmad Tri Hadi; Rido Putra; Zaim Rais
JURNAL YAQZHAN: Analisis Filsafat, Agama dan Kemanusiaan Vol 11, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : IAIN SYEKH NUR JATI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24235/jy.v11i2.23749

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In this article, the crisis of authority of science in the post-truth era is analyzed in a dialogical reflection between the science studies of Bruno Latour and the Islamic metaphysics of Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. The context of the investigation is rooted in the challenge of public confidence in science, hoax information, as well as the rising impact of ideology rather than facts in decision-making. This article has a twofold purpose: first, to analyze with a comparative-hermeneutic dialogical approach the works of Latour and al-Attas, considering both philosophical backgrounds despite differences in scholarship, in relation to the challenge of science credibility; second, considering an in-depth review of both Latour’s science studies and al-Attas’ metaphysical thinking in an Islamic context. Articles in refereed journals, books, among other literature sources focusing on science education, science epistemology, as well as literature on Islamic thought, have been used in analyzing information in this article. The results of the analysis have shown commonalities between both Latour’s perspectives and al-Attas’ metaphysical thoughts in relation to a new vision emphasizing the reintegration of science into a metaphysical view. Latour requires a reassembly of science through the agency of a network model of socio-material actors, whereas al-Attas promotes the Islamization of knowledge on the basis of ta’dib and the Islamic worldview. In the conclusion, the current paper finds that there is a potential for a more nuanced and holistic approach through the dialogical encounter between the two models for addressing the problem of the crisis in the legitimation of science.ABSTRAK: Artikel ini mengkaji krisis epistemologis otoritas sains di era post-truth melalui refleksi dialogis antara studi sains Bruno Latour dan metafisika Islam Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah merosotnya kepercayaan publik terhadap sains, maraknya misinformasi (hoax), serta meningkatnya pengaruh narasi ideologis dan emosional dibandingkan bukti empiris. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menelusuri bagaimana Latour dan al-Attas, meskipun berasal dari tradisi filsafat yang sangat berbeda, secara kritis merespons krisis kredibilitas sains dan menawarkan kerangka epistemologis alternatif. Dengan menggunakan metode hermeneutik-dialogis dan komparatif, kajian ini menganalisis karya-karya utama kedua pemikir tersebut yang dikontekstualisasikan melalui literatur kontemporer tentang pendidikan sains, epistemologi, dan pemikiran Islam. Data penelitian diperoleh dari jurnal ilmiah, buku, dan literatur lainnya yang membahas pendidikan sains, krisis post-truth, dan Islamisasi ilmu. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa baik Latour maupun al-Attas sama-sama mengkritik modernitas dan menekankan pentingnya mengembalikan sains ke dalam kerangka etika dan metafisika yang lebih luas. Latour menyerukan penyusunan ulang sains melalui jaringan aktor sosial-material, sementara al-Attas menggagas Islamisasi ilmu yang berlandaskan pada ta’dib dan pandangan hidup Islam. Artikel ini menyimpulkan bahwa pertemuan dialogis antara kedua kerangka ini dapat menawarkan respons yang lebih kaya dan holistik terhadap krisis legitimasi sains, serta mengarah pada epistemologi yang tidak hanya menekankan pengetahuan, tetapi juga kebijaksanaan dan makna.
Metode Ijtihad Kontemporer Versi Yusuf Qordhawi Rini Angreni Hasibuan; Azharia Khalida; Efendi; Zaim Rais
Kariman: Jurnal Pendidikan Keislaman Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Pendidikan dan Keislaman
Publisher : Institut Kariman Wirayudha Sumenep

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52185/kariman.v11i1.258

Abstract

This article is motivated by the emergence of various problems at this time, but did not exist in ancient times. So it is very necessary for the ijtihad of the scholars to re-establish a law. Yusuf al-qordhawi as a contemporary scholar has his own way of establishing laws on contemporary issues. In that regard, this article aims to describe the contemporary ijtihad method used by Yusuf al-qordhawi in establishing a law. This research is a descriptive qualitative research using literature review. Data sources in this study are books, journals and other things related to the problem. This research is carried out systematically, namely collecting data, processing, concluding and using certain techniques to find answers to problems. The results showed that Al- Qardhawi was very selective and rational in establishing laws on the problems at hand. Here are some fatwas set by yuusf qordhawi with his ijtihad, namely about the legal determination of shaking hands between men and women who are not mahram, the determination about being allowed to breastfeed through the Breast milk Bank (Breast Milk), and not prohibiting marriage between milk mothers and relatives, Determination about the obligation of a father to ask for the consent of his daughter to be married, and must not force him to marry,  Against al-Qaradhawi's fatwa on abortion due to rape that occurred in Bosnia. Yusuf qordhawi has several ijtihad methods, namely ijtihad intiqho'I, ijtihad insya'I and ijtihad combined insha'i and intiqho'i. and also still requires the postulates of the establishment of law in classical times, such as ijma, qiyas, istihsan, and others. And the main thing is that the legal establishment remains sourced from the Quran and hadith.
Religious Tolerance: A Weapon Against Radicalism Due To The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Fauzi Ridhallah; Efendi Efendi; Zaim Rais; Quratul Aini
An-Nuha : Jurnal Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Budaya dan Sosial Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): July
Publisher : LP2M Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64810/annuha.v13i1.934

Abstract

Radicalism is a big problem that hits the current condition. Almost every region and place experience this problem. There are many factors that cause radicalism to appear, one of which is the development of technology such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), although this problem does not necessarily disappear just like that, but there needs to be an attitude to suppress this problem, namely is to give rise to various tolerance attitudes which can reduce and even kill the problem of radicalism. In the research, the researcher uses the literature study method by digging for information and analyzing various sources to offer solutions to this problem of radicalism. The purpose of this research is to seek to find the impact of the influence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology on the problem of radicalism and offer solutions related to this problem. Obtaining information from researchers to gain religious tolerance can suppress the development of radical ideas caused by Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Moderasi Beragama di Kalangan Minoritas Muslim di Indonesia Ali Amran; Zaim Rais
Hikmah Vol 19, No 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMU DAKWAH DAN KOMUNIKASI ISLAM
Publisher : IAIN Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/hik.v19i1.16328

Abstract

This study examines the practice of religious moderation among Muslim minority communities in Indonesia, particularly in regions where non-Muslims constitute the majority, such as Bali, East Nusa Tenggara, Papua, and North Sulawesi. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, the research explores the dynamics of religious life among Muslim minorities in practicing their faith, maintaining Islamic identity, and interacting socially with majority communities of different beliefs. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document analysis from various local sources. The findings reveal that Muslim minorities often face several challenges, including social discrimination, restrictions on the construction of places of worship, and intolerant attitudes from segments of the community. In this context, the implementation of religious moderation principles—which include tolerance, non-violence, cultural accommodation, and national unity commitment—is seen as an effective approach to strengthening social cohesion and fostering harmonious coexistence. This study recommends the need for more inclusive, systematic, and context-sensitive public policies to support the sustainable practice of religious moderation. Such efforts are crucial to creating a safe, just, and equitable social space for all religious groups, especially for those in minority positions.