Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum Arena Hukum Risalah Hukum
Syukri Hidayatullah
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Kewenangan Negara dan Kewajiban Subyek Hukum Perdata dalam Hubungannya dengan Hukum Pajak Syukri Hidayatullah
PRANATA HUKUM Vol 11 No 1 (2016): Januari
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v11i1.189

Abstract

Although it is understood that the Tax Law is part of the Public Law, but the Tax Law has close links with the Civil Code and mutually concerned. That's because most of the Tax Law looking for basic possibilities for the collection of the events, circumstances and legal acts engaged in environmental civil, such as income, wealth, treaties submission, the transfer of rights as inheritance, compensation, debt relief, and so on. With the enactment of the tax in the form of the Act, means the tax is not a voluntary payment but as an obligation that must be followed so that if people do not meet their obligations will be sanctioned. From the standpoint of the Private Law, the tax in terms of the law is engagement arising from the Law (Tax Law) requires a person who fulfills the conditions prescribed by the Act to pay a sum of money to the treasury state that can be imposed. This research is to discuss the legal relationship between the obligation of natural person as part of Private Law and Tax Law as part of the Public Law.
Tindakan Amerika Serikat Dalam Menarik Diri Dari Paris Agreement Dalam Kerangka Hukum Internasional Mush'ab Al Ma'ruf; Mahendra Putra Kurnia; Syukri Hidayatullah
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 16, Nomor 2, Desember 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v16i2.158

Abstract

This research is motivated by the United States, which withdrew from the Paris Agreement because for the United States, the Paris Agreement is an agreement that weakens the economy. Following Article 28 of the Paris Agreement, this action raises problems that the United States cannot withdraw before 2020. In this case, there needs to be legal clarity in binding the country to global climate protection. The act of withdrawing the United States from the Paris Agreement would undoubtedly be a problem for the countries incorporated in it. In this case, the Paris Agreement continues to run as it should because the United States withdrew using the mechanisms contained in the Paris Agreement. Still, the United States continues to handle climate change because it does not come out of the Convention (UNFCCC). Then in the campaign and carbon trading, the United States should compensate for having left obligations as a developed country party following the Paris Agreement.
Ekonomi Biaya Tinggi dalam Pelayanan Birokrasi dan Diskresi Pemerintah yang Dilematis Syukri Hidayatullah
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Volume 6, Nomor 2, Desember 2010
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

It is an common matter when inefficiency bureaucracy take an advantage by cost and benefit. There is so many poor service in public sector where people need it. Grease, graft and bribery were some reason behind these problems and one from another become the manifestation of corruption. This thing is purchase and sale based the order resulted in high-cost economy. It is called corruption because discrimination for the public service was exist whos pay higher will become priority. Government seems tobe let it happen and all rules to direct the public was neglected. It’s all about the public service, the government should in charge or maybe we should know something inside bureacracy. This article would like to analyze not only merely the money spending but also to get the picture out inside bribery, grease, discretion and administration.
PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PENGATURAN STANDARDISASI MENURUT AGREEMENT TBT DAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 7 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG PERDAGANGAN Syukri Hidayatullah
Arena Hukum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2016)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (423.271 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.7

Abstract

AbstractAgreement on Technical Barriers to Trade has been agreed as part of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade /GATT and implemented by the WTO member states. In Indonesia, Act No.7/2014 About Trade adopted the system, such as standardization, technical regulations and conformity assessment. This research aims to get the enforcement of standardization according to Act No.7/2014 as compared with the provisions of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade and to obtain the impact of standardization in reducing technical barriers to trade. The research is a normative legal research using comparative approach. The degree of object comparison is discussed using economic analysis of law. The result shows that economic analysis assumes rational behavior of the State to achieve maximum prosperity through multilateral trade agreements. Multilateral agreements are an efficient choice because it produces a universal agreement. Thus, the allocation of norms of standardization in Act No.7/2014 About Trade is assumed to sync with the Agreement on Technical Barrier to Trade, but there is a difference in controlling the equilibrium of treatment. Standardization is still considered to become potential for technical barriers of trade. The essence of this obstacle accounts as internal measures. AbstrakAgreement on Technical Barriers to Trade disepakati sebagai bagian dari perjanjian General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) dan dilaksanakan oleh negara –negara anggota WTO. Di Indonesia, Undang-undang No.7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan mengatur norma yang diadopsi dari Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, yaitu standardisasi, regulasi teknis dan penilaian kesesuaian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan hasil pemberlakuan standardisasi menurut Undang-undang No.7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan yang dibandingkan dengan Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade dan untuk mendapatkan dampak standardisasi dalam mengurangi hambatan teknis perdagangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. Derajat perbandingan objek penelitian dibahas menggunakan analisis ekonomi terhadap hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa analisis ekonomi mengasumsikan perilaku rasional Negara untuk mencapai kemakmuran yang sebesar-besarnya melalui perjanjian dagang multilateral. Perjanjian multilateral merupakan pilihan sikap yang efisien karena menghasilkan perjanjian yang universal. Dengan demikian, alokasi norma standardisasi dalam Undang-undang No.7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan sinkron dengan Agreement on Technical Barrier to Trade. Standardisasi bekerja sebagai instrumen hukum dalam pasar bebas melalui perlindungan lingkungan, keselamatan konsumen, kemanan dan kesehatan publik. Instrumen standardisasi membantu konsumen membandingkan karakteristik produksi dan menambah preferensi bagi konsumen untuk produk sejenis.
Co-Authors Mahendra Putra Kurnia Mush'ab Al Ma'ruf