Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kacapuri : Jurnal Keilmuan Teknik Sipil Buletin Poltanesa SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah
Achmad Jaya Adhi Nugraha
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
KOMPARASI METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DAN SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DALAM PENENTUAN SKALA PRIORITAS PROYEK PEKERJAAN (Studi Kasus : CV. EUK Samarinda ) Achmad Jaya Adhi Nugraha
Jurnal Kacapuri : Jurnal keilmuan Teknik Sipil Vol 2, No 1 (2019): JUNI JURNAL KACAPURI : JURNAL KEILMUAN TEKNIK SIPIL
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.299 KB) | DOI: 10.31602/jk.v2i1.2069

Abstract

Semua proyek pekerjaan yang dikeluarkan oleh PT. PLN (Persero) Wilayah Samarinda secara resmi diumumkan melalui e-procurement. Masalah yang muncul adalah bagaimana CV. EUK dapat menentukan tawaran proyek pekerjaan mana yang layak untuk dikerjakan sehingga secara tidak langsung dapat mempengaruhi kenaikan harapan pada Laba Kotor yang akan diterima. Masalah ini juga terkait langsung bagaimana menentukan penjadwalan proyek kerja yang dilakukan pada skala prioritas. Metode AHP diterapkan untuk menentukan Skala Prioritas Kerja yang akan dipilih dengan B / C Analysis sebagai model pengambilan keputusan. Diharapkan penerapan metode ini secara tidak langsung dapat meminimalkan keterlambatan dalam penyelesaian pekerjaan dan meningkatkan harapan penerimaan Laba Kotor. Sebagai pembanding digunakan metode SAW. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode AHP jauh lebih baik daripada metode SAW, dan mampu menunjukkan kelemahan metode pemilihan proyek yang digunakan CV. EUK sejauh ini.All job projects issued by PT. PLN (Persero) Area Samarinda is officially announced through e-procurement. The problem that arises is how the CV. EUK can determine which job project bid is feasible to work so that it can indirectly affect the increase of expectation on Gross Profit to be received. This problem is also directly related to how to determine the scheduling of work projects undertaken on a priority scale. The AHP method is applied to determine the Work Priority Scale to be selected with B / C Analysis as a decision-making model. It is hoped that the implementation of this method can indirectly minimize the delay in the time of completion of the work and increase the expectation on the acceptance of Gross Profit. As a comparison used SAW method. The results showed that AHP method is much better than SAW method, and able to show weakness of project selection method used CV. EUK so far. 
Analysis of User Acceptance of the Academic Information System at Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Method Achmad jaya adhi Nugraha; Muhammad Zulfariansyah
Poltanesa Vol 27 No 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : P3KM Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51967/tanesa.v27i1.3858

Abstract

This study uses the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to analyse how well Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda's Academic Information System is received by the general public. Academic administration and the quality of services provided to students and faculty are both greatly enhanced by the use of information technology in today's higher education institutions. This study delves deep into the elements that influence users' attitudes, behavioural intentions, and actual system utilisation, specifically examining the impact of perceived utility and perceived ease of use. Academic Information System users at Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda were surveyed using questionnaires to gather data. In addition, the data was examined in order to determine the connections between the TAM framework variables. In order to help the university improve service quality and create a more effective, efficient, and user-oriented system, this research is anticipated to explain the level of user acceptability of the academic information system. Additionally, this study has the potential to be a reference for future research on the topic of educational technology adoption.
Analisa Penyebab Kegagalan Proyek Ditinjau dari kinerja Waktu, Biaya, dan Mutu Muhammad Rio; Findia Findia; Achmad Jaya Adhi Nugraha
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Januari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i1.5458

Abstract

The success of construction projects is commonly assessed by achieving time, cost, and quality targets, whereas failure appears as delays, cost overruns, and noncompliance with technical specifications. Based on construction project management concepts and the time–cost–quality trade-off, this study aims to identify factors influencing the risk of failing to achieve time, cost, and quality objectives in construction projects located in Samarinda City, Kutai Barat Regency, and Mahakam Ulu Regency, and to determine the most dominant factor. A descriptive approach with a survey method was applied to 36 respondents selected using random sampling. The independent variables comprise time, cost, and quality performance, while the dependent variable is project failure. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using Pearson validity tests, Cronbach’s Alpha reliability tests, and percentage calculations of each aspect’s contribution. The results indicate that all items of time (7 items), cost (13 items), and quality (6 items) performance are valid, with correlation coefficients exceeding the critical value of 0.329 and significance levels below 0.05, and reliable, with alpha values of 0.821, 0.901, and 0.849, respectively. The analysis of failure factors reveals that the cost aspect is the most dominant contributor at 50%, followed by quality at 44%, while time contributes 36%. These findings emphasize the need to prioritise budget control and quality assurance systems, supported by effective time management, to reduce the risk of construction project failure in East Kalimantan.
Co-Authors Findia, Findia Muhammad Rio Muhammad Zulfariansyah