Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi
Amsar A. Dulmanan
Dosen Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama (UNU) Indonesia
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Multikulturalisme dan Politik Identitas: Catatan Reflektif atas Gagasan Politik Will Kymlicka Amsar A. Dulmanan
Muqoddima Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi Vol 1 No 1 (2020): MUQODDIMA Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi
Publisher : Laboratorium Sosiologi Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/MJPRS.001.01.03

Abstract

Diversity is a sociological fact of the Indonesian that cannot be denied. Diversity is the innate origin of the Indonesian nation, even long before the Indonesian nation-state was formed. It means, traditionally, the Indonesian people have actually been accustomed to diversity. But in the context of the modern Indonesian nation-state, diversity has meaning and socio-political demands that are far different from the ancient type of diversity. In this context, this article will discuss the political ideas of multiculturalism proposed by Will Kymlicka. Using the literature study this article discusses several views on multiculturalism, as well as the main points and general framework of Kymlicka’s multicultural political ideas and their position in the discourse on democracy and plural society. I argue that there are at least two dilemmas faced by theories of multiculturalism in looking at culture and cultural differences. First, an essentialist understanding of culture that presupposes that culture is a fixed, unchanging, and independent entity. Secondly the strong claims of university values in various understandings about multiculturalism is a challenge in itself, at the same time it indicates a long way to go in formulating theories to overcome the problem of cultural differences on the basis of the principle of liberalism.
Asas Tunggal Pancasila dan Upaya Memaknai Kembali “Stabilisasi” Politik Indonesia Amsar A. Dulmanan
Konfrontasi: Jurnal Kultural, Ekonomi dan Perubahan Sosial Vol 2 No 2 (2015): Konfrontasi, July
Publisher : Budapest International Research and Critics University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (701.94 KB) | DOI: 10.33258/konfrontasi2.v4i2.45

Abstract

This paper deals with the single principle of Pancasila and efforts to redefine the "stabilization" of Indonesian politics. Ideological strengthening measures are based on the historical power of Indonesia, which is filled with a variety of conflicts and conflicts within community groups, in political parties or in elites in state institutions, especially in competition, polarization of political interests and ideological background. The concept of ideology cannot be destroyed, always dynamizing itself as an awareness that is believed by many people, groups or within political party institutions. From this understanding, at least the New Order patterned a political awareness about the necessity of Pancasila to become an ideology of the state in the direction of an ideological awareness in a life together in a community, becoming a nation within the Indonesian state.
Multikulturalisme dan Politik Identitas: Catatan Reflektif atas Gagasan Politik Will Kymlicka Dulmanan, Amsar A.
Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi Vol 1 No 1 (2020): Muqoddima Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi
Publisher : Laboratorium Sosiologi, Program Studi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/MJPRS.001.01.03

Abstract

Diversity is a sociological fact of the Indonesian that cannot be denied. Diversity is the innate origin of the Indonesian nation, even long before the Indonesian nation-state was formed. It means, traditionally, the Indonesian people have actually been accustomed to diversity. But in the context of the modern Indonesian nation-state, diversity has meaning and socio-political demands that are far different from the ancient type of diversity. In this context, this article will discuss the political ideas of multiculturalism proposed by Will Kymlicka. Using the literature study this article discusses several views on multiculturalism, as well as the main points and general framework of Kymlicka’s multicultural political ideas and their position in the discourse on democracy and plural society. I argue that there are at least two dilemmas faced by theories of multiculturalism in looking at culture and cultural differences. First, an essentialist understanding of culture that presupposes that culture is a fixed, unchanging, and independent entity. Secondly the strong claims of university values in various understandings about multiculturalism is a challenge in itself, at the same time it indicates a long way to go in formulating theories to overcome the problem of cultural differences on the basis of the principle of liberalism.
Tubuh yang Terlibat, Konteks, dan Objektivitas: Sains sebagai Praktik Sosial yang Manusiawi Muhammad Nurul Huda; Amsar A. Dulmanan
Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi Vol 5 No 2 (2024): Muqoddima: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Riset Sosiologi
Publisher : Laboratorium Sosiologi, Program Studi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial, Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia (UNUSIA) Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47776/MJPRS.005.02.08

Abstract

Dominant perspectives in modern science assume that scientific knowledge is ideally value-free and neutral. This claim is problematic as it overlooks the fact that science is a social practice carried out by knowers—embodied, context-bound, and value-laden beings. This article, through the lens of critical realism and personalism, offers an alternative framework that understands science as a value-laden activity without abandoning its commitment to objective reality. A philosophical analysis, combined with two historical case studies—Imam al-Shafi‘i’s revision of Islamic jurisprudence and Copernicus’ scientific revolution—yields three main findings. First, scientific knowledge is fallible, as it is rooted in the limitations of human conditions. Second, scientific objectivity is achieved not by eliminating values, but through critical reflection on the positionality of values within scientific communities. Third, a fully humanized science is more capable of generating transformative and responsible knowledge. These findings offer important implications for epistemology, education, and contemporary scientific practice, particularly in rethinking the relationship between reality, values, and the knowing subject.
Co-Authors Muhammad Nurul Huda