Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Tarbiyah Islamiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam An-Nafis: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan
Fakhrie Hanief
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PERBEDAAN BACAAN DALAM PEMBELAJARAN ILMU TAJWID MENURUT THARIQ AL-SYATIBI DAN IBN AL-JAZARI PADA QIRA’AT ‘ASHIM RIWAYAT HAFS Fakhrie Hanief
Tarbiyah Islamiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam Vol 5, No 1 (2015): Juni
Publisher : UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4042.262 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jtipai.v5i1.1822

Abstract

Qira’at Imam ‘Ashim dengan riwayat Imam Hafs merupakan rujukan utama umat Islam dalam membaca Al-Qur’an, tercatat hampir 95% umat Islam yang menggunakannya, sedangkan qira’at lain merupakan qira’at minoritas yang digunakan sebagian kecil umat Islam. Dalam prakteknya penggunaan qira’at Imam ‘Ashim dengan riwayat Imam Hafs terdapat banyak thariq (jalur) dengan berbagai macam perbedaan bacaan, sehingga terkadang membuat kesalahfahaman di kalangan umat Islam dalam membaca Al-Qur’an, khususnya mempelajari ilmu tajwid. Kesalahfahaman tersebut seringkali mengakibatkan saling tuduh menuduh bahwa bacaan di salah satu pihak lebih benar sedangkan di pihak lain tidaklah benar. Jika dikaji secara mendalam, semua perbedaan-perbedaan dalam membaca Al-Qur’an berdasarkan qira’at Imam ‘Ashim riwayat Imam Hafs dengan berbagai thariq-nya dapat dipertanggungjawabkan kebenarannya.Kata Kunci: Tajwid, Thariq al-Syatibi, Ibn al-Jazari, Qira’at ‘Ashim
Wali Dalam Perspektif Ulama Dan Masyarakat Kampung Dalam Pagar Martapura Muhammad Rusydi; Fakhrie Hanief; Ahmad Zainal Anbiya
Al-Banjari : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol. 22 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pascasarjana UIN ANTASARI Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/albanjari.v22i2.11270

Abstract

This article examines the concept of saintliness (wali) from the perspectives of scholars and the local community in Dalam Pagar Village, Martapura, South Kalimantan. Within the context of Sufism, the notion of saintliness is an intriguing topic that requires in-depth understanding. This research utilizes a qualitative descriptive method, with a focus on fieldwork conducted in Dalam Pagar, where this phenomenon occurs. The research findings reveal that the views of scholars and the local community align with the general understanding within Sufism. They regard saintliness as a result of devoted practice of Islamic Sharia, unwavering faith, and profound piety. Furthermore, the social behaviors of the people in Pagar support this perspective. The community warmly welcomes the presence of saints or individuals considered to have the potential for saintliness, especially when there is endorsement and recognition from respected scholars or spiritual leaders. This recognition is reflected in various forms of reverence, such as pilgrimages, commemorative gatherings (haul), and the display of images or photographs of saints in their homes. However, it is important to note that the community also exercises caution regarding individuals who lack clear legitimacy as saints. This caution becomes more significant in the absence of official endorsement from recognized religious authorities. In conclusion, the concept of saintliness in Sufism significantly influences the culture of the community in Dalam Pagar Martapura. The perspectives of scholars and the behaviors of the community regarding saintliness reflect a traditional understanding rooted in faith, piety, and the practice of Islamic Sharia. Moreover, the legitimacy provided by religious authorities plays a pivotal role in solidifying someone's status as a saint in the eyes of the community.
Qur'anic Interpretation and the Formation of Wasatiyyah Discourse in Contemporary Indonesia Fakhrie Hanief; Anwar Hafidzi
An-Nafis: Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Published in April of 2026
Publisher : STIT Syekh Muhammad Nafis Tabalong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The increasing religious polarization in Indonesia has triggered urgent debates about how moderate Islamic identity can be maintained in a diverse society. Within this context, the concept of wasatiyyah (moderation) has become a central theological and policy framework, yet most existing scholarship treats it as a static doctrinal category rather than a dynamically constructed discourse. This study addresses this gap by examining how Qur'anic interpretation actively shapes the formation of wasatiyyah discourse in contemporary Indonesia. The research aims to analyze the interpretive mechanisms through which Qur'anic verses related to moderation are mobilized by Indonesian scholars and religious institutions to construct inclusive religious narratives aligned with national policy agendas. Employing a qualitative methodology that integrates textual analysis of key Qur'anic verses (including ummatan wasatan, anti-ghuluw, and justice-related passages) with discourse analysis of interpretive frameworks from major Indonesian religious institutions, this study reveals three principal findings: first, wasatiyyah emerges as a polysemic concept negotiated through diverse interpretive strategies emphasizing balance, justice, tolerance, and social harmony; second, contemporary Indonesian tafsir increasingly adopts maqasid-oriented and contextual approaches that transform wasatiyyah from theological principle into policy-relevant discourse; and third, institutional actors such as Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and the Ministry of Religious Affairs play decisive roles in mediating interpretive authority. The study concludes that understanding wasatiyyah as a discursive construct rather than fixed doctrine offers more productive pathways for strengthening religious moderation initiatives, and recommends greater attention to interpretive pluralism and contextual hermeneutics in moderation policy frameworks.
Co-Authors Ahmad Zainal Anbiya Anwar Hafidzi Muhammad Rusydi