Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal HUKUM BISNIS
Betty Kurnia Rahayu
universitas narotama
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
RATIO DECIDENDI PUTUSAN NO. 119/PDT.SUS-PHI/2019/PN.PBR. TERHADAP PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJASAMA ANTARA PEGAWAI DAN PT. MALINDO KARYA LESTARI Nabil Mahri; Betty Kurnia Rahayu; Mochamad Jazri Aditiya Pranata; Oktafredianus Dede Lisiansu
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Volume 5 no 1 April 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Malindo Karya Lestari was sued by two people who were formerly employees who worked for the company. ON Law no. 2 of 2004 concerning the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes regarding the settlement of labor disputes through the Industrial Relations Court. In this lawsuit is the Work Termination Lawsuit arising from the Termination of Employment Decree issued by the Defendant because the Defendant did not agree with the existence of a labor union in the Defendant's Company so that the Defendant prevented the Plaintiffs from forming or carrying out labor union activities (Union Busting). Termination of Employment due to disputes that arise and have not found a suitability of opinion regarding the final decision of Termination of Employment. Keywords: Employment Relations Decision, Decidendi Ratio
EKSAMINASI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA DALAM STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PA PEMATANG SIANTAR NOMOR 0030/PDT.G/2015/PA.PST Betty Kurnia Rahayu
Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Volume 5 no 1 April 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Examination of decisions is a process of examination, so examination of judicial decisions can be interpreted as examining court decisions and judges whose task is to try a case. In this case, it concerns the distribution of joint assets in a divorce case in which the joint assets are controlled by one of the parties who is now called the defendant. Joint assets have been regulated in Article 35 of the Marriage Law, known as joint assets. And article 53 of the Marriage Law is a method of dividing property in a marriage. The distribution of joint assets according to the Islamic Law Compilation must be divided equally between the two or ½ part for each husband and wife. Therefore, the judge decided several points for married couples in judging in order to carry out justice Keywords: Employment Relations Decision, Decidendi Ratio
Co-Authors Mochamad Jazri Aditiya Pranata Nabil Mahri Oktafredianus Dede Lisiansu