Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies Muwazah: Jurnal Kajian Gender
Ade Dedi Rohayana
Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Mutualism Interactions in the Changes of Social and Islamic Law Ade Dedi Rohayana
Jurnal Hikmatuna Vol 8 No 1 (2022): HIKMATUNA: Journal for Integrative Islamic Studies, June 2022
Publisher : Postgraduate Program, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) K. H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (494.148 KB) | DOI: 10.28918/hikmatuna.v8i1.5683

Abstract

Humans and everything of God's creation will benefit from Islamic law. Through the establishment of beneficial rules, Islam seeks to advance the world and its inhabitants. Islamic law must contain advantages throughout history. Changes in the law and disagreements in the law that arise among Islamic jurists are all advantageous. Change is an essential component of human existence. This is due to the fact that God has provided humanity with a great deal of capacity to effect significant life changes. God endowed people with three potentials: the potential for rationality or intellectual capacity, defensive potential, and offensive potential. These three potentials are the driving force and urge for humans to be able to differentiate between useful and harmful activities. Individually and socially, therefore, human life is highly dynamic, continually evolving, and ever-changing. These transformations and processes are known as social change in society. Islamic law must be revised due to the inevitability of societal development. Islamic law, as God's rule that benefits humanity, is unquestionably capable of adapting to and responding to this societal transformation. In order to respond and adapt to these societal changes, Islamic jurists (fuqaha) created a widely accepted norm, namely, that Islamic law can alter and vary based on changes in time, location, circumstances, intents, and traditions. Social changes have ramifications for the evolution of Islamic law, while the evolution of Islamic law has implications for social change. The interaction between the two is mutualistic.
Gender Ideology in the Study of Islamic Legal Thought at Postgraduate UIN K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan Ali Muhtarom; Ade Dedi Rohayana; Maghfur Ahmad; Kurnia Muhajarah; Nur Hamid
MUWAZAH : jurnal kajian gender Vol 15 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/muwazah.v15i1.1420

Abstract

The formation of gender ideology can occur at various levels, and allows it to be socialized through social and institutional institutions at various levels. One of them is a university where students learn to research and study Islamic law. Higher education is one of the vital media to build a gender responsive culture. The focus in this study is to analyze gender ideology that influences students in researching and writing scientific papers, and how gender construction in Islamic legal thinking is in student work. Based on this study using a qualitative-phenomelologic approach and descriptive-analytic in nature, it was found out that, first, the gender ideology of students in conducting research and writing scientific papers is justice and gender awareness, secondly, the construction of Islamic legal thought in Postgraduates can be grouped according to two; 1) the orientation or direction of graduate student gender studies is more dominated by contextual or applied-empirical studies than textual or normative-legalistic studies. 2) the direction of analysis of gender studies is more defined as a study "about" women, not a study with a gender perspective or a study that uses gender as an analytical tool. Even though the two have fundamental differences, the difference is in the way of viewing used, not just gender, but more about the roles and functions between men and women.
Co-Authors Ali Muhtarom Kurnia Muhajarah Maghfur Ahmad Nur Hamid