Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an
Muhammad Suaib Tahir
Institut PTIQ Jakarta, Indonesia
Religion Humanities

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENANGGULANGAN KORUPSI MELALUI PENDEKATAN TEOLOGIS BERBASIS AL-QURAN Muhammad Suaib Tahir; Ali Fikri Noor
Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an Vol. 20 No. 2 (2020): Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an
Publisher : Institut PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (677.604 KB) | DOI: 10.53828/alburhan.v20i2.210

Abstract

This study concludes that overcoming corruption with a non-theological conventional approach is deadlocked, which is caused by a moral crisis, identity, and social situation, and group propaganda that prioritizes corruption prevention strategies with an approach to improving legislation rather than theological approach. The conventional, non-theological approach has so far turned out to be ineffective, because it is only superficial (saṭḥiyyun wa ẓāhiriyyun), not a deep solution, that is, a solution that reaches deep into the substance of the problem, namely theological or religious approach. The perspective of the Qur'an in dealing with corruption is found through three strategies, namely: detective, preventive, and repressive. Detective and preventive strategies are pursued in three ways: strengthening faith, strengthening the heart, and strengthening morality. Meanwhile, the repressive strategy is pursued in four ways: strengthening supervisory institutions (al-ḥisbah), strengthening juridical law and the judiciary, strengthening communities, and strengthening aspects of religiosity. Meanwhile, the detective, preventive, and repressive strategies as a whole are taken through strengthening theological values. The method used in this study is a qualitative method, based on library research, verses of the Qur'an, publications in the form of research results, journals, seminars, and articles. While the interpretation method used is the thematic interpretation method (tafsīr mawḍū’ī), both when analyzing problems from a theological point of view and when using verses of the Qur'an.
MANAJEMEN KONFLIK ANTARUMAT BERAGAMA BERBASIS AL-QURAN, ETIS DAN TEKNIS Muhammad Suaib Tahir; Abdul Jamil Wahab; Muhammad Hariyadi
Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an Vol. 22 No. 02 (2022): Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an
Publisher : Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53828/alburhan.v22i02.1032

Abstract

This study demonstrates Quran-based Interfaith Conflict Resolution as a conflict management model that introduces and promotes the theory of nonviolence and peace-building and the principle of coexistence among religious believers. Although some verses in Quran may mention and justifies the use of limited force as in Quranic verses QS. al-Baqarah/2:190 and QS. al-Hajj/9:39, some others also present a lot of principles and the implementation of nonviolence including patience, forgiveness, tolerance, dispute prevention and management, the prohibition of seeking revenge, clarification (tabayun), dialogue, negotiation, mediation, mutual curse (mubahalah), acceptance of agreement, persuasive preaching, reconciliation, and amnesty. This study introduces the Ethical-Technical Conflict Resolution or Management model as it contains ethical and technical foundation formulas. The ethical foundation formula as the basic principles, for example, includes justice, maslahah (public interest), tolerance, and nonviolence. In the meantime, the technical foundation which is operational in nature includes dialogue, social interaction and cooperation, negotiation, mediation, peace agreement, law enforcement, reconciliation and amnesty
Co-Authors Abdul Jamil Wahab Ali Fikri Noor Muhammad Hariyadi