Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Systematic Literature Review terkait Learning Obstacles Siswa SMP pada Pemahaman Konsep Aljabar Qonita Tri Maulina; Halimatu Sa'diyyah; Cita Dwi Rosita; Wahyu Hartono
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 4 No 1 (2024): IJHESS AUGUST 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v4i1.1121

Abstract

Learning obstacles faced when solving math problems have become an exciting topic to research. This is due to the importance of developing mathematical concepts and understanding skills, especially algebraic concepts. This study aims to describe the research results related to junior high school students learning obstacles in understanding algebraic concepts. This research uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method, comprising 22 studies. This study concludes that research related to junior high school students learning obstacles in understanding algebra concepts is found most in Sinta publications, then continued with Scopus, EBSCO, Proceeding, and DOAJ. These studies include a variety of methods used, with the Didactical Design Research approach dominating. Epistemological, didactical, and ontogenic barriers were the main concerns, with didactical obstacles being the most common in this study. These obstacles include the lack of direct interaction and active learning between teachers and students and the lack of optimal use of varied learning methods and teaching aids, causing students to have difficulty in planning problem-solving strategies, solving story problems, and understanding mathematical concepts thoroughly. Concrete efforts that can be made to overcome the identified obstacles include utilizing active, collaborative, and exploratory learning approaches.
Mathematics Learning Revolution: Implementation of Geogebra in Spldv Material Cartini, Nining; Cita Dwi Rosita; Setiyani, Setiyani
International Journal of Educational Research Excellence (IJERE) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): July-December
Publisher : PT Inovasi Pratama Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/ijere.v3i2.1177

Abstract

This article discusses the use of GeoGebra as a tool in learning Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SPLDV). GeoGebra, created by Markus Hohenwarter in 2001, has grown to become one of the most popular educational tools worldwide, allowing students and teachers to explore mathematical concepts visually and interactively. With features such as graph generation, mathematical object manipulation, and intersection analysis, GeoGebra facilitates a deeper understanding of SPLDV. The purpose of this article is to explain how using GeoGebra can simplify the learning process for Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SPLDV). The research methodology used includes qualitative and quantitative approaches, by measuring student understanding before and after using GeoGebra. The research results show that GeoGebra not only improves understanding of mathematical concepts, but also develops students' problem solving and critical thinking skills. Thus, GeoGebra contributes significantly to improving the quality of mathematics teaching and learning.
KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS MAHASISWA: SLR DALAM PERSPEKTIF EPISTEMIK DAN DISKURSIF Cita Dwi Rosita; Irmawati Liliana Kusuma Dewi; Asep Amam
Euclid Vol 13 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/e.v13i1.11833

Abstract

Mathematical reasoning and mathematical communication are two fundamental dimensions of learning mathematics in higher education that are often investigated separately. This article aims to reconceptualize their relationship through an epistemic–discursive perspective, viewing reasoning and communication as mutually constitutive practices in undergraduate students’ mathematical activity. The study employs a systematic literature review of articles published in internationally reputable journals over the last decade that address mathematical reasoning, communication, argumentation, and discourse in higher education contexts. The synthesis was conducted using thematic synthesis enriched by theoretical analysis. The findings indicate that mathematical reasoning cannot be fully understood without considering the communicative dimension and the discursive norms that mediate it, while mathematical communication functions as a medium of thinking and meaning-making rather than merely a means of expression. Based on these findings, the article proposes an integrative conceptual framework that positions mathematical argumentation and epistemic norms as central mediators between students’ reasoning and communication. This study contributes theoretically by offering a reconceptualization of reasoning and communication that is relevant for research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education.
PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS: DARI KOGNISI INDIVIDUAL MENUJU PRAKTIK EPISTEMIK–DISKURSIF Irmawati Liliana Kusuma Dewi; Cita Dwi Rosita; Marwia Tamrin Bakar
Euclid Vol 13 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33603/e.v13i1.11834

Abstract

Mathematical conceptual understanding is a fundamental goal of mathematics education, particularly in higher education where students are required to engage with abstract concepts, formal structures, and relationships among mathematical ideas. However, research consistently indicates that instructional practices tend to prioritise procedural success over the development of deep conceptual understanding. This article aims to systematically synthesise research on undergraduate students’ mathematical conceptual understanding by adopting an epistemic–discursive perspective. A systematic literature review was conducted on Scopus-indexed journal articles published between 2014 and 2024 that focus on higher education mathematics. The findings indicate that mathematical conceptual understanding is constructed through the interaction of mathematical representations, discourse and communication, mathematical reasoning, and epistemic norms embedded in learning environments. The review also reveals that conceptual understanding should not be viewed solely as an individual cognitive attribute, but rather as a practice that develops through students’ participation in formal mathematical activity. Based on this synthesis, the article proposes an integrative conceptual framework that positions mathematical conceptual understanding as an epistemic–discursive practice. This framework is expected to contribute to theoretical advancement and inform future research and instructional design in undergraduate mathematics education.