Gusliana H.B., Gusliana
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KEDUDUKAN BADAN PELAKSANA KEGIATAN USAHA HULU MINYAK DAN GAS BUMI PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 36/PUU-X/2012 ginting, daris a raft; H.B., gusliana; haryono, dodi
FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8, No 3 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Relations between the Implementing Agencies of Oil and Gas with Business Entities or Permanent Establishment has put the State and Business Entities or Permanent Establishments that manage oil and gas are in the same position. As a result, the State lost the discretion to make regulations for the benefit of the People. While the Government in carrying out the functions of state control over oil and natural gas resources should has the discretion to make regulation that is profitable for the prosperity of the entire community. Those conditions are so far from optimality. Indonesian oil and gas industry is still heavily dependent on foreign domination. Do Indonesian people ask for judicial review of Oil and Gas Law to the Constitutional Court. While the result of Constitutional Court is the Implementing Agencies of Oil and Gas disbanded. As a replacement, the Government through Presidential Decree No. 9 of 2013 on Maintenance of Management for Upstream Oil and Gas takes over all the functions and duties of the Implementing Agencies of Oil and Gas. Keywords: Oil and Gas, Implementing Agencies of Oil and Gas, functions of state control
PERBANDINGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 3 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PENGADILAN ANAK DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK DALAM PEMERIKSAAN PERKARA ANAK DI PENGADILAN ANAK febri, armanila; H.B., Gusliana; Ramadhan, Davit
FIAT JUSTISIA Vol 8, No 1 (2014): FIAT JUSTISIA
Publisher : Lampung University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Children are people who have physical or mental limitations. Limitation understand everything, tends to bring negative influences into themselves and can cause it to do damage (juvenile delinquency) or even become perpetrators of delinquency (a criminal offense). Law No. 3 of 1997 on Juvenile Justice (Juvenile Court Act), in principle, was born to protect and nurture children in conflict with the law (ABH). However, it was legally incapable angle Court Law provide legal protection against the ABH. Thus was born the amount of number 11 of 2012 on the Criminal Justice System Child (Law SPPA) to replace the Juvenile Justice Act. In the case of change of the Act there are striking differences in issues related to children in the examination of the case law SPPA. The purpose of this paper are: first, to determine the childs examination of the case in court demanding the setting ABH Court Law Act with SPPA angle. Second, to determine the advantages and disadvantages of the examination of cases in court, according to Law ABH juvenile justice law with Law SPPA. Keywords: Comparative, investigation, Case, Children in conflict with the law(ABH), Juvenile Justice