Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERSEPSI PELAKU KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA TERHADAP UU PKDRT NO 23 TAHUN 2004 Jamilah, Jamilah; Adicahya, Akmal
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 6, No 2: Desember 2014
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (352.146 KB) | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v6i2.3208

Abstract

The Domestic Violence Act of Indonesia has been applied for 10 years. However, it seems this act does not reduce significantly the practice of domestic violence. Lawrence Friedman emphasizes that there is legal culture that influences legal system. It means that the acceptance of citizen influences the quality of legal system. This research shows that the offenders of domestic violence accept the regulation. Moreover, they consider this regulation as good act to implement. However, there are several factors that make them still practice violence toward their family. Less knowledge, public acceptance and psychological condition contribute to the level of obedience before the law. Therefore, citizens need a good and massive socialization from government about this regulation.
PENGAKUAN TERHADAP PIHAK NON-ADVOKAT DALAM PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM (Politik Hukum Bantuan Hukum Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia) Adicahya, Akmal
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 6 No 3 (2017)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.399-420

Abstract

Access to justice is everyone rights that have to be fulfilled by the government. The regulation number 16 year 2011 of legal aid is an instrument held by the government to guarantee the right. The regulation allowed the participation of non-advocates to provide the legal aid. Through this policy, government emphasizes that:1) Indonesia is a state law which legal aid is an obliged instrument; 2) the prohibition of non-advocate to participate in legal aid is not relevant due to inadequate amount of advocate and citizen seek for justice (justiciabelen), and the advocate is not widely extended throughout Indonesia; 3) Non-Advocates, especially lecturer and law student are widely spread; 4) there are no procedural law which prohibits non-advocate to provide a legal aid. Those conditions are enough argument for government to strengthen the participation of non-advocates in providing legal aid. Especially for The Supreme Court to revise The Book II of Guidance for Implementing Court’s Job and Administration.Keywords: legal aid, non-advocate, justice