Articles
<![CDATA[MEMPERLUAS MAKNA ZINA DALAM GUGATAN PERCERAIAN (Studi kasus putusan Pengadilan Agama Tigaraksa No. 1538/Pdt.G/2013/PA.Tgrs) ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA Vol 1, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Akta Yudisia Vol. 1 Nomor 2 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Borneo Tarakan ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (328.007 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35334/ay.v1i2.969
<![CDATA[Abstract This study focused on discussing the meaning of zina laws that existed at the Compilation of Islamic Law and Government Regulation No. 9 Year 1975 on the implementation of Law No. 1 Year 1974 on Marriage, which the courts in applying the word adultery should also look at the changing patterns of behavior and adultery today. Adultery should no longer be defined as sexual intercourse with the entry of male into the female sex, but the behavior of adultery was bermcam-wide one is oral sex. Behavior oral sex is a matter of a lawsuit against a husband and wife on the grounds of adultery lawsuit, but the court rejected it. This study contains the problem is how judges interpret the word adultery in making judgments in divorce? whether oral sex can be classified into the word adultery? The study found that oral sex by law can not be regarded as adultery, but the act of adultery into. Proof of adultery can only be recognized when the entity relationship entry into the male female sex. In conclusion, the judges interpret the meaning of the word adultery adultery per se, but the behavior of adultery are now widely different patterns and actions. Justice should not only look at the regulations simply make judgments, but look at the pattern of behavior or adultery committed in defining the word adultery.Keywords: adultery, oral sex, meaning law]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN AHLI WARIS YANG PENERIMA HIBAH DARI ORANG TUA TERHADAP AHLI WARIS LAINNYA PADA PROSES PEMBAGIAN WARIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>;
<![CDATA[Suprapton, Muhammad Yusuf]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Yuridis Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Yuridis ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (297.72 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35586/.v4i2.253
<![CDATA[This research focused on the clarification in the meaning of legal status of the heir which is the heir received the donation (grant) from the parents before. In fact, the other heirs does not recognize the position of donation receiver to gets inheritance rights belong to parents. This research using context of probles as how the legal status of the heir (donation receiver) belong to the other heirs in receiving inheritance, is the donation receiver does not has rights in inheritance. Research result found that meaning of donation in the 3 perspective of private law giving the similar consequences, thus are based on private law (civil code), adat law, and islamic fiqih law (KHI). Those are giving perspective that donation is recognized as the inhertance. And the legal status of receiver donation is available to receive inheritance. ]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI (POLITIK HUKUM) HUKUM KEWARISAN DI INDONESIA MENGACU PADA KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 3 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Yuridis Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Yuridis ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (430.87 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35586/.v1i2.154
<![CDATA[The concequenses of inheritance is happened if the heir passed away and its leaves inheritee. Inheritance is a part of the private law context in Indonesian law which is regulate the relatisionship among people. Indonesian Prvate Law context nowday put inheritance practice into three metode first is based on Civil Code, second is based on indigeneous law, and third is Kompilasi Hukum Islam. This research is study about Islamic inheritance according to Kompilasi Hukum Islam and how far the justice implementation of it to the moslem people. The statement of justice still rise many interpretation among ulama fiqh, somehow many interpretation of fiqh intheritance is based on his personal argument until Its make the judge of Islamic court tries to make his decision according his syariah law capability. This study using descriptive methodology with juridical normative. For the conclusion, Islamci inheritance in KHI is regulated to uniform many interpretation of inheritance fiqh, but its still rise the problems of justice in implementation. Its because of many ulama fiqh has different interpretation. Thus , for the practice its depend on the judge in Islamic Court. ]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM ARBITRASE (POLITIK HUKUM) SEBAGAI UPAYA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (TINJAUAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 30 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA) ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Yuridis Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Yuridis ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (100.548 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35586/.v2i2.202
<![CDATA[Nowdays every business actor as the modern businessmen would like to settled any business dispute more quickly, simply, to prevent from any risk which is rise. Government regulated the alternative dispute settlement on business field that is arbitration law. The arbitration regulation becoming a legal politic study which is interested because of the implementation of it not apply well. This research study about the Economy law and development in Indonesia regarding arbitration and how the legal politic of arbitration is perform. This study is using descriptive methodology with juridical normative. For the conclusion is law and development in Indonesia especially arbitration is not beginning with values of societies, but taken from condition of reformation of Indonesia. However the economic law and development still need to enforce in according to make justice and prosperity especially for business actor.]]>
<![CDATA[KEDUDUKAN SURAT WASIAT TERHADAP HARTA WARISAN YANG BELUM DIBAGIKAN KEPADA AHLI WARIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Yuridis Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Yuridis ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (301.24 KB)
|
DOI: 10.35586/.v5i1.317
<![CDATA[This research focused on the legal standing of testament toward inheritance property which devide yet. Testament recognized as a last will of person to be received by person who determined on it. Potentially, These will rise a dispute between testament receiver and the heir. It because of the heir would be bring it to the disputed if testament not desired. Thus, the testament would be not executed. This research using context of problems as how the legal standing of the testament toward inheritance property which devide yet and continue with is that testament should be execute absolutely toward inheritance property. Research result the testament has no absolutely legal standing to be execute toward inheritance property as long as rise the disputed. The dispute is related with the diclaimer from the heir toward testament substance. Thus, the testament is the last will of people do not perform well as the last will it because of the testament rejected probably. The rejection performed by court as well as the heir lawsuit.]]>
<![CDATA[Interpretation of Interfaith and/or Belief Marriage by Judges: Disparity and Legal Vacuum: Penafsiran Perkawinan Beda Agama dan/atau Kepercayaan Oleh Hakim: Disparitas dan Kekosongan Hukum ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 3 (2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31078/jk2039
<![CDATA[Judges experience disparities in interpreting marriages of different beliefs and/or religions, resulting in different legal products, both determinations made. There is a difference between granting and rejecting. Interestingly, the understanding of the Constitutional Court judges and judges at District Courts has a significant disparity where one says there is a legal vacuum and the other is clear in accordance with the law. This study concerning a disparity in interfaith marriages in its determination and the legal vacuum of different-faith marriages created by judges in court. This study concludes that in practice judges in court in giving considerations believe there is a legal vacuum against marriages of different beliefs, as a result judges determine whether there is a disparity determination that is granted or not. The Constitutional Court itself interprets its decisions (2014 and 2022) that interfaith marriages are clear and do not constitute a legal vacuum in its enforcement.]]>
<![CDATA[Application of the Maximum 1/3 Obligatory Bequest (Wasiat wajibah) Principle in Adopted Children Grants ]]>
<![CDATA[Kusuma Arum, Nimas Ayuni]]>;
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Hukum Replik Vol 12, No 1 (2024): JURNAL HUKUM REPLIK ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31000/jhr.v12i1.9691
<![CDATA[This research focuses on explaining about grants to adopted children that exceed 1/3 of the assets of their adoptive parents, resulting in heirs being hindered from obtaining their inheritance. This research using contxt of probles as how is the application of the maximum one-third provision on grants to adopted children? What are the consequences if the assets granted to the adopted child exceed one-third of the assets of the adoptive parents? This study falls under the typology of normative legal research. The research findings explain that grants to adopted children must adhere to the maximum one-third provision of the assets owned by the grantor, as stipulated in Article 210 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). If this provision is not followed by the grantor, a violation occurs in the grant process, potentially causing harm to the heirs. As a result of assets exceeding the maximum 1/3 provision, the grant can still be valid or null and void under the law.]]>
<![CDATA[PROBLEMATIK PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL TENTANG INDIKASI GEOGRAFIK PADA UNDANG-UNDANG MEREK ]]>
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Panorama Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2016): Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (449.367 KB)
|
DOI: 10.21067/jph.v1i2.1413
<![CDATA[Implementation of Act Nomor 15 Year 2001 already happened since 2001 in Indonesia. This regulation is adopted from TRIPs International Convention (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) which have ratified by Indonesia. One of the substantion on it is merk protection of intellectual property. Nowday, every district in Indonesia has it product related the natural resources. This product is becoming the symbol of market from each district in Indonesia. Its become a symbol market of district because of every district has a special characteristic. This characteristic is called geographic indication according to act Number 15 year 2001 about merk. Later on formulation of geographic indication in Act Number 15 year 2001 potentially come a problematic in the purposes and characteristic. Its because of nature of geographic indication is different within merk according act Number 15 year 2001 generally.]]>
<![CDATA[The Role of Mediation Agreement of Divorce Which Ended Amicably (Case at Yogyakarta Religious Court) ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad, Dodi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ JUSTITIA JURNAL HUKUM Vol 6 No 2 (2022): Justitia Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30651/justitia.v6i2.17179
<![CDATA[Mediation is one form of alternative dispute resolution outside the Court. The purpose of mediation is to resolve disputes between the parties by involving a neutral and impartial third party. The process of implementing mediation is actually very simple, but in reality there are many things that hinder or complicate the success of mediation. It is proven from the number of unsuccessful mediations compared to successful mediations in court. The formulation of the problem proposed is: How is the consideration of the divorce mediation peace agreement at the Yogyakarta Religious Court and whether the divorce dispute mediation agreement is in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016. The purpose of this research is to find out how the consideration of the peace agreement on divorce mediation in the Yogyakarta Religious Court and to find out the divorce mediation agreement according to Perma No. 1/2016. 1 of 2016. This research includes Empirical Research. Research data were collected by means of interviews and literature study. The analysis was carried out by Sociological Jurisdiction. The results of the analysis at the Yogyakarta Religious Court in 2017 mediation succeeded in reaching an agreement that only 11 cases out of a total of 241 cases were mediated, in 2018 only 19 cases out of a total of 265 cases, in 2019 only 23 cases out of a total of 204 cases, and in 2020 only 16 cases out of a total of 191 cases. Consideration of peaceful mediation, namely the role of the mediator and the good faith of the parties in conducting mediation. 1 of 2016, such as the type of case requiring mediation, good faith in taking mediation, costs incurred in mediation, mediation venue, and mediator certification. This makes mediation successful/peaceful, peace is one of the goals in civil disputes. ]]>
<![CDATA[PEMAKNAAN DISPARITAS PERKAWINAN PADA USIA ANAK UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 16 TAHUN 2019 DAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Putri, Tania Ariska]]>;
<![CDATA[Sanjaya, Umar Haris]]>
<![CDATA[ Literasi Hukum Vol 7, No 1 (2023): LITERASI HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tidar ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31002/lh.v7i1.7515
<![CDATA[Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perkawinan menyebutkan pada Pasal 7 ayat (1) bahwasannya, perkawinan hanya diizinkan apabila pria dan wanita sudah mencapai usia 19 tahun. Selanjutnya, Pasal 7 ayat (2) yaitu apabila terjadinya penyimpangan terhadap ketentuan umur sebagaimana dijelaskan dalam Pasal (1), orang tua pihak pria maupun wanita dapat mengajukan dispensasi perkawinan kepada pengadilan dengan alasan mendesak disertai bukti pendukung yang cukup. Berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 7 ayat (2) tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 26 ayat (1) huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak yang menjelaskan mengenai tanggung jawab orang tua untuk mencegah terjadinya perkawinan pada usia anak. Terdapat ketidaksesuaian pada kedua Undang-Undang tersebut, dalam Undang-Undang perlindungan anak orang tua berkewajiban mencegah terjadinya perkawinan pada usia anak sedangkan dalam Pasal 7 ayat (2) Undang-Undang perkawinan justru membuka peluang bagi orang tua untuk dapat menikahkan anaknya yang masih dibawah batas usia diperbolehkannya menikah tanpa melanggar aturan Negara.]]>
