Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Fajar Laksono Soeroso, Fajar Laksono
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Memaknai Kecenderungan Penyelesaian Konflik Batas Wilayah Ke Mahkamah Konstitusi Soeroso, Fajar Laksono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 3 (2012)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (523.817 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

The trend of border conflict resolution to the Constitutional Court is interesting to analyzed. This analysis founded three interesting things that the Supreme Court decision did not resolve the problem but it raises a new problem, the precedent decision of the Constitutional Court may cancelling the Supreme Court decision, and the trial process in Constitutional Court felt more fair and openess. From its trend emerging of new legal loophole, which the parties became adressat Supreme Court decision not run a Supreme Court decision. This legal loophole seemed to justify    the unlawful acts because the Supreme Court decision has binding and should be implemented.This trend is not a question of rivalry between the Supreme Court    and Constitutional Court, but rather about how the judiciary presents a reliable judicial process and is believed by the justice seekers so that decisions can resolve the problem and  implemented.
Aspek Keadilan dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Soeroso, Fajar Laksono
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 11, No 1 (2014)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (226.44 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

The final nature of the Constitutional Court’s decisions is often questioned. The main problem, among others, when the justice seekers of Constitutional Court, there is nothing else to do but to accept and implement the Court’s decision although shackled and deprived of justice by the Constitutional Court. This paper confirms the absence of the issue of the fairness aspect of the Constitutional Court when the justice seekers recognize and understand at least three (3) terms, namely (1)  the nature of the final position is attached to the nature of the Constitution as the supreme law so that there is no other commandment greater height of it is an effort to keep constitutional judicial authority and legal certainty; (2) the nature of the final decision of the Constitutional Court is an attempt to preserve the constitutional authority of the courts so different from the general court; and (3) possibility Constitutional Court contains the error persists considering Constitutional Court Judges are human beings, but until now, there is no better alternative replaces the final nature of the Decision.
LINIERITAS LEGISLASI DAN AJUDIKASI KONSTITUSIONAL DALAM PENEGAKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 (ANALISIS TERHADAP UNDANG- UNDANG PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR, BUPATI, DAN WALIKOTA) LEGISLATION LINEARITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION IN ENFORCING THE 1945 CONSTITUTION (ANALYSIS OF GOVERNOR, REGENT AND MAYORAL ELECTION)) Soeroso, Fajar Laksono
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 12, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Juni 2015
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v12i2.397

Abstract

UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota besertaperubahannya telah ditetapkan menjadi dasar hukum pelaksanaan pemilihan gubernur,bupati, dan walikota (pilkada) serentak yang akan dilaksanakan mulai Desember 2015. Meskidemikian, penting mencermati kembali sisi substansi, terutama aspek konstitusionalitasnya.Hal itu sesuai dengan postulat bahwa setiap aktifitas demokrasi harus dilaksanakan dalamtertib hukum di bawah doktrin supremasi konstitusi, maka selain bertujuan memperbaikikualitas pilkada, UU pilkada harus pula disusun dalam kerangka menegakkan norma UUD1945, yang dicerminkan dalam putusan-putusan MK. Untuk itu, tulisan ini menganalisislinieritas UU pilkada dengan Putusan MK pada 3 (tiga) hal, yaitu (a) kewenangan atributifKPU sebagai penyelenggara pilkada; (b) pengaturan mengenai persyaratan tidak dipidana bagicalon kepala daerah; dan (c) kewenangan MK mengadili perselisihan hasil pilkada. Hasilanalisis menunjukkan, (1) pemberian kewenangan atributif kepada KPU untukmenyelenggarakan pilkada ketaklinierannya dengan Pasal 22E UUD 1945 dan Putusan MKNomor 1-2/PUU-XII/2014; (2) meski terkesan mengakomodir Putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU-XII/2013, pemberian kewenangan kepada MK untuk mengadili perselisihan hasil pilkadamerupakan penyelundupan hukum yang bertentangan dengan Putusan tersebut; dan (3) dalamhal persyaratan tidak dipidana 5 tahun bagi calon kepala daerah, UU pilkada linier denganPutusan MK Nomor 4/PUU-VII/2009. Namun, linieritas itu potensial terganggu olehpengaturan di level pedoman teknis yang menjadi kewenangan penyelenggara pilkada.
Co-Authors