Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE'JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Padjadjaran Journal of International Law
Laina Rafianti & Davina Oktivana, Laina Rafianti &
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

 1 
Book Review: Marine Protected Areas in International Law: an Arctic Perspective Oktivana, Davina
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.876 KB)

Abstract

Marine biodiversity has always become an interesting topic in the development of the law of the sea subject. Despite of human dependence on marine resources, human intervention has been proven as the major threats to the sustainability of marine biodiversity and marine environment protection. Human activities, such an over-exploitation, shipping pollution, the use endangered fishing tools and above all, climate change, have changes the ecosystems extensively. One of the significant measures to prevent broaden the catastrophe is the establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which has been accepted as a tool for protection and conservation of marine biodiversity. The book provides a comprehensive observation and analysis of the MPAs concept and its implementation, specifically in the Arctic. This book is based on Ingvild Ulrikke Jakobsens PhD thesis at the University of Tromsø, Norwegia. Her concerned particularly based on the development of human activities in the Arctic, that will definitely affect the fragile marine environment and there is an increasing need to ensure environmental protection and conservation of marine biodiversity and ecosystems in Arctic.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n2.a11
Urgensi Revisi Undang-Undang Landas Kontinen Indonesia Oktivana, Davina
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Padjadjaran University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4233.742 KB)

Abstract

Pengaturan mengenai landas kontinen di Indonesia khususnya dalam menentukan batas terluar landas kontinen masih mengacu pada ketentuan Konvensi Jenewa tentang Landas Kontinen tahun 1958, yaitu menggunakan kriteria kedalaman dan kemampuan dalam melakukan eksploitasi. Sementara Indonesia telah meratifikasi Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982, dimana kriteria dalam menentukan batas terluar landas kontinen berdasarkan konvensi ini dinilai lebih menguntungkan bagi negara pantai. Keuntungan yang dimaksud adalah penggunaan kriteria topografi dasar laut dan diperbolehkannya negara pantai mengajukan perpanjangan landas kontinen. Indonesia telah mengajukan submisi perpanjangan landas kontinen yang berlokasi di barat laut Sumatera pada tahun 2008 dan disetujui oleh Komisi Batas-Batas Landas Kontinen PBB pada tahun 2010, dan saat ini sedang mempersiapkan submisi perpanjangan landas kontinen lainnya di utara Papua dan selatan Nusa Tenggara. Adanya perkembangan dan praktik tersebut tidak diikuti dengan perubahan UU Landas Kontinen Indonesia yang seharusnya mengacu pada kriteria yang lebih relevan berdasarkan Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982. Revisi UU Landas Kontinen menjadi penting karena telah mengarah pada ketidakpastian dan pertentangan dalam hukum positif di Indonesia.The Urgency of Indonesian Continental Shelf Act Revision AbstractThe definition of the outer limit of the continental shelf in Indonesian Continental Shelf Act is still referring to the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, which applied the criteria of depth and the ability to exploit. On the other hand, Indonesia has ratified the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, where the criteria in determining the outer limit of the continental shelf is considered more advantageous to coastal states, for instance, the application of seabed topography criteria and the admissible of coastal states to propose an extension of the continental shelf. Indonesia has submitted an extended continental shelf located in the northwest of Sumatra in 2008 and had been approved by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf of the UN in 2010, and currently preparing another submission located in the northern Papua and southern Nusa Tenggara. Notwithstanding the development and Indonesia’s practice, these situations are not followed by adjusting the Indonesian Continental Shelf Act. Thus, the urgency of revision of Indonesia’s Continental Shelf Act is necessary, due to uncertainty and contradistinction in Indonesia’s positive law.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n2.a3
Arrest and Detention of ‘Boat People’ in Indonesia Territory Water Oktivana, Davina
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol 1, No 1 (2017): PJIL Volume 1, Number 1, January 2017
Publisher : Padjadjaran Journal of International Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (384.126 KB)

Abstract

AbstractAs a Coastal State, Indonesia has full sovereignty to implement its national regulations to prevent illegal fishing in their territorial waters. One example of prevention effort can be pointed out by the arrest and detention of hundreds of ‘boat people’ while they were conducting illegal fishing in Derawan Islands territory waters, East Kalimantan. They did transshipment and their fishing methods were prohibited regarding to Indonesian regulations. The issue of illegal fishing will be analyzed in regard to international law and as a part of the enforcement of Coastal State sovereignty. ‘Boat people’ refer to a group of people who spend most of their life and do all their activities in a boat, within the territorial waters of Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines. The ‘boat people’ issues would be determined from two conceptions. The first one would be nationality issue. Most of the ‘boat people’ were proven to be stateless while few of them have been identified as citizen of Philippines. Indonesia and Malaysia authorities denied and did not recognize them as part of their nationality. It was contrary from what ‘boat people’ were claiming that they were originally from Semporna, Malaysia. Indonesia itself considered ‘boat people’ as a foreign fishers. There will be diverse approaches in dealing with those who hold a nationality and those who do not. The second conception would be concerning to the terminology of ‘traditional fishers’ and ‘traditional fishing rights’ based on international law and national regulation, and how state practices implement it. Furthermore, there would be comparison of international practices related to traditional fishing rights based on international law. Keywords: ‘boat people’, illegal fishing, nationality, stateless person, traditional fishing rights.Abstrak Sebagai negara pantai, Indonesia mempunyai kedaulatan penuh untuk mengimplementasikan kebijakan nasionalnya untuk mencegah penangkapan ikan ilegal di wilayah perairan teritorialnya. Salah satu contoh dari tindakan pencegahan adalah penangkapan dan penahanan ratusan ‘manusia perahu’ pada saat mereka melakukan penangkapan ikan secara ilegal di perairan kepulauan Derawan, Kalimantan Timur. Mereka melakukan transit dan penangkapan ikan dengan metode yang dilarang oleh hukum Indonesia. Isu penangkapan ikan ilegal akan dianalisa dengan hukum internasional dan sebagai bagian dari penegakan kedaualatan negara pantai. ‘Manusia perahu’ mengacu pada sejumlah orang yang menghabiskan sebagian besar aktivitas hidupnya dalam kapal, dalam peraairan teritorial Indonesia, Malaysia dan Filiphina. ‘Manusia perahu’ berkenaan dengan dua konsep. Pertama adalah isu nasionalitas. Kebanyakan ‘manusia perahu’ terbukti tidak mempunyai kewarganegaraan, sedangkan sebagian dari mereka sudah diidentifikasi sebagai warga negara Filiphina. Otoritas Indonesia dan Malaysia tidak mengakui mereka sebagai bagian dari warga negara kedua negara ini. Hal ini sangat berlawanan dengan ‘manusia perahu’ yang melakukan klaim bahwa mereka berasal dari Semporna, Malaysia. Indonesia sendiri menganggap ‘manusia perahu’ sebagai penangkap ikan asing. Ada beberapa cara dalam menangani mereka yang telah mempunyai kewarganegaraan dan mana yang belum. Konsepsi kedua adalah berkenaan dengan terminilogi ‘penangkap ikan tradisional’ dan ‘hak menangkap ikan secara tradisional’ berdasarkan hukum internasional dan peraturan nasional, dan bagaimana praktik negara diimplementasikan. Lebih lanjut lagi, akan ada perbandingan mengenai praktik internasional berkenaan dengan hak memancing tradisional berdasarkan hukum internasional. Kata Kunci: ‘manusia perahu’, illegal fishing, kebangsaan, tak berkewarganegaraan, hak nelayan tradisional.
ARREST AND DETENTION OF ‘BOAT PEOPLE’ IN INDONESIA TERRITORY WATER Davina Oktivana
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, Volume 1, Number 1, January 2017
Publisher : International Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/pjil.v1i1.277

Abstract

AbstractAs a Coastal State, Indonesia has full sovereignty to implement its national regulations to prevent illegal fishing in their territorial waters. One example of prevention effort can be pointed out by the arrest and detention of hundreds of ‘boat people’ while they were conducting illegal fishing in Derawan Islands territory waters, East Kalimantan. They did transshipment and their fishing methods were prohibited regarding to Indonesian regulations. The issue of illegal fishing will be analyzed in regard to international law and as a part of the enforcement of Coastal State sovereignty. ‘Boat people’ refer to a group of people who spend most of their life and do all their activities in a boat, within the territorial waters of Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines. The ‘boat people’ issues would be determined from two conceptions. The first one would be nationality issue. Most of the ‘boat people’ were proven to be stateless while few of them have been identified as citizen of Philippines. Indonesia and Malaysia authorities denied and did not recognize them as part of their nationality. It was contrary from what ‘boat people’ were claiming that they were originally from Semporna, Malaysia. Indonesia itself considered ‘boat people’ as a foreign fishers. There will be diverse approaches in dealing with those who hold a nationality and those who do not. The second conception would be concerning to the terminology of ‘traditional fishers’ and ‘traditional fishing rights’ based on international law and national regulation, and how state practices implement it. Furthermore, there would be comparison of international practices related to traditional fishing rights based on international law.Keywords: ‘boat people’, illegal fishing, nationality, stateless person, traditional fishing rights. AbstrakSebagai negara pantai, Indonesia mempunyai kedaulatan penuh untuk mengimplementasikan kebijakan nasionalnya untuk mencegah penangkapan ikan ilegal di wilayah perairan teritorialnya. Salah satu contoh dari tindakan pencegahan adalah penangkapan dan penahanan ratusan ‘manusia perahu’ pada saat mereka melakukan penangkapan ikan secara ilegal di perairan kepulauan Derawan, Kalimantan Timur. Mereka melakukan transit dan penangkapan ikan dengan metode yang dilarang oleh hukum Indonesia. Isu penangkapan ikan ilegal akan dianalisa dengan hukum internasional dan sebagai bagian dari penegakan kedaualatan negara pantai. ‘Manusia perahu’ mengacu pada sejumlah orang yang menghabiskan sebagian besar aktivitas hidupnya dalam kapal, dalam peraairan teritorial Indonesia, Malaysia dan Filiphina. ‘Manusia perahu’ berkenaan dengan dua konsep. Pertama adalah isu nasionalitas. Kebanyakan ‘manusia perahu’ terbukti tidak mempunyai kewarganegaraan, sedangkan sebagian dari mereka sudah diidentifikasi sebagai warga negara Filiphina. Otoritas Indonesia dan Malaysia tidak mengakui mereka sebagai bagian dari warga negara kedua negara ini. Hal ini sangat berlawanan dengan ‘manusia perahu’ yang melakukan klaim bahwa mereka berasal dari Semporna, Malaysia. Indonesia sendiri menganggap ‘manusia perahu’ sebagai penangkap ikan asing. Ada beberapa cara dalam menangani mereka yang telah mempunyai kewarganegaraan dan mana yang belum. Konsepsi kedua adalah berkenaan dengan terminilogi ‘penangkap ikan tradisional’ dan ‘hak menangkap ikan secara tradisional’ berdasarkan hukum internasional dan peraturan nasional, dan bagaimana praktik negara diimplementasikan. Lebih lanjut lagi, akan ada perbandingan mengenai praktik internasional berkenaan dengan hak memancing tradisional berdasarkan hukum internasional. Kata Kunci: ‘manusia perahu’, illegal fishing, kebangsaan, tak berkewarganegaraan, hak nelayan tradisional.
Urgensi Revisi Undang-Undang Landas Kontinen Indonesia Davina Oktivana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 3, No 2 (2016): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (4233.742 KB)

Abstract

Pengaturan mengenai landas kontinen di Indonesia khususnya dalam menentukan batas terluar landas kontinen masih mengacu pada ketentuan Konvensi Jenewa tentang Landas Kontinen tahun 1958, yaitu menggunakan kriteria kedalaman dan kemampuan dalam melakukan eksploitasi. Sementara Indonesia telah meratifikasi Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982, dimana kriteria dalam menentukan batas terluar landas kontinen berdasarkan konvensi ini dinilai lebih menguntungkan bagi negara pantai. Keuntungan yang dimaksud adalah penggunaan kriteria topografi dasar laut dan diperbolehkannya negara pantai mengajukan perpanjangan landas kontinen. Indonesia telah mengajukan submisi perpanjangan landas kontinen yang berlokasi di barat laut Sumatera pada tahun 2008 dan disetujui oleh Komisi Batas-Batas Landas Kontinen PBB pada tahun 2010, dan saat ini sedang mempersiapkan submisi perpanjangan landas kontinen lainnya di utara Papua dan selatan Nusa Tenggara. Adanya perkembangan dan praktik tersebut tidak diikuti dengan perubahan UU Landas Kontinen Indonesia yang seharusnya mengacu pada kriteria yang lebih relevan berdasarkan Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982. Revisi UU Landas Kontinen menjadi penting karena telah mengarah pada ketidakpastian dan pertentangan dalam hukum positif di Indonesia.The Urgency of Indonesian Continental Shelf Act Revision AbstractThe definition of the outer limit of the continental shelf in Indonesian Continental Shelf Act is still referring to the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf, which applied the criteria of depth and the ability to exploit. On the other hand, Indonesia has ratified the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea, where the criteria in determining the outer limit of the continental shelf is considered more advantageous to coastal states, for instance, the application of seabed topography criteria and the admissible of coastal states to propose an extension of the continental shelf. Indonesia has submitted an extended continental shelf located in the northwest of Sumatra in 2008 and had been approved by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf of the UN in 2010, and currently preparing another submission located in the northern Papua and southern Nusa Tenggara. Notwithstanding the development and Indonesia’s practice, these situations are not followed by adjusting the Indonesian Continental Shelf Act. Thus, the urgency of revision of Indonesia’s Continental Shelf Act is necessary, due to uncertainty and contradistinction in Indonesia’s positive law.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v3n2.a3
Book Review: Marine Protected Areas in International Law: an Arctic Perspective Davina Oktivana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 4, No 2 (2017): PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (487.876 KB)

Abstract

Marine biodiversity has always become an interesting topic in the development of the law of the sea subject. Despite of human dependence on marine resources, human intervention has been proven as the major threats to the sustainability of marine biodiversity and marine environment protection. Human activities, such an over-exploitation, shipping pollution, the use endangered fishing tools and above all, climate change, have changes the ecosystems extensively. One of the significant measures to prevent broaden the catastrophe is the establishment of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which has been accepted as a tool for protection and conservation of marine biodiversity. The book provides a comprehensive observation and analysis of the MPAs' concept and its implementation, specifically in the Arctic. This book is based on Ingvild Ulrikke Jakobsen's PhD thesis at the University of Tromsø, Norwegia. Her concerned particularly based on the development of human activities in the Arctic, that will definitely affect the fragile marine environment and there is an increasing need to ensure environmental protection and conservation of marine biodiversity and ecosystems in Arctic.  DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n2.a11
[BOOK REVIEW] The Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes Davina Oktivana
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 6, No 1 (2019): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (557.845 KB)

Abstract

Yoshifumi Tanaka is a Professor of International Law at the Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen. He has published widely in the fields of the law of the sea and international environmental law. I had a profound admiration for Tanaka’s writings, particularly in law of the sea subjects. He has a compelling method in deliberating issues comprehensively but still convenient to digest, especially for academicians, practitioners, and law students (postgraduate). Settlement of International Dispute is considered as a foundation of the establishment and the development of International Law. Accordingly,  there are plenty of books and writings had published addressing similar topic, however, Tanaka’s book is distinctive. Tanaka successfully gives the reader an exhaustive and extensive analysis  of the procedures for dispute settlement both in traditional means and newly development. In addition, He complemented figures and tables to give the reader a comprehensive understanding.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v6n1.a11
DAMPAK PENERAPAN PRINSIP COMMON HERITAGE OF MANKIND DI KAWASAN DASAR LAUT DAN SAMUDERA YANG BERADA DI LUAR YURISDIKSI NASIONAL SERTA PEMANFAATAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL DI KAWASAN TERSEBUT BERDASARKAN HUKUM Davina Oktivana
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE'JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE'JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Volume 1 Nomor 1
Publisher : Lembaga Kajian Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (183.203 KB) | DOI: 10.35706/dejure.v1i1.409

Abstract

ABSTRAKDasar laut dan dasar samudera diketahui sebagai lokasi di mana banyak ditemukan sumber non-hayati berupa batu-batuan yang kaya akan kandungan logam dan mineral. Konvensi Hukum Laut 1982 mengatur dasar laut dan samudera yang berada di luar yurisdiksi nasional atau disebut sebagai Kawasan, serta pemanfaatan sumber daya non-hayati khususnya sumber daya mineral dengan menerapkan prinsip common heritage of mankind. Seluruh aktivitas yang berkaitan dengan eksplorasi dan eksploitasi di Kawasan diatur oleh International Seabed Authority (ISBA). ISBA memiliki kewenangan dalam menentukan Negara atau perusahaan mana yang akan melakukan penambangan, lokasi mana yang dapat dilakukan penambangan, jangka waktu serta biaya yang ditetapkan. Dalam tulisan ini akan ditelusuri bagaimana aspek hukum konsep benefit for mankind dan benefit sharing dalam penerapan prinsip common heritage of mankind terhadap Kawasan dan sumber daya mineral yang terkandung di dalamnya, dimulai sejak kemunculannya dan perkembangan yang menyertainya, kemudian bagaimana aspek-aspek lain yang mempengaruhi penerapan prinsip tersebut. Terakhir, akan dijelaskan mengenai dampak terhadap perlindungan lingkungan laut yang muncul akibat kegiatan eksplorasi dan eksploitasi terhadap sumber daya mineral. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan prinsip common heritage of mankind melahirkan konsep benefit for mankind dan benefit sharing dalam kegiatan eksplorasi dan eksploitasi sumber daya mineral di Kawasan. Konsep benefit for mankind berarti semua negara tanpa terkecuali memiliki hak yang sama untuk melakukan kegiatan di Kawasan, sementara benefit sharing adalah pembagian keuntungan dari Negara-negara penambang yang di distribusikan secara merata kepada negara dengan status least-developed atau negara tidak berpantai (land-locked states). Terdapat pengaturan secara zonasi dan pembedaan spesies dalam upaya melakukan tindakan konservasi, serta pengaturan khusus mengenai pencemaran lingkungan laut oleh aktivitas penambangan di Kawasan berdasarkan KHL 1982, 1994 Agreement, The Mining Code (ISBA) maupun prinsip-prinsip yang berlaku berdasarkan hukum kebiasaan internasional.Kata kunci: Common Heritage of Mankind, Kawasan Dasar Laut, Sumber Daya Mineral.ABSTRACTSeabed and ocean floor known as the site where many non-biological sources found in the form of rocks rich in metals and minerals. Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 regulates the of oceans and seas which are beyond national jurisdiction or referred to as the Region, as well as the utilization of non-living resources, especially mineral resources by applying the principle of common heritage of mankind. All activities related to the exploration and exploitation in the area governed by the International Seabed Authority (ISBA). ISBA have the authority to determine the country or which company will do mine, which location do mining, as well as the time period a set fee. In this article will explore how the legal aspects of the concept of benefit for mankind and benefit sharing in the application of the principle of common heritage of mankind against the Region and mineral resources contained therein, starting from its origins and developments that accompany it, then what about the other aspects that affect the application of the principle. The last, in this article will explain the impact on the protection of the marine environment arising from the exploration and exploitation of mineral resources. The results showed that the application of the principle of common heritage of mankind gave birth to the concept of benefit for mankind and benefit sharing in the exploration and exploitation of mineral resources in the Area. The concept of benefit for mankind means all countries without exception have the same rights to perform activities in the Region, while benefit sharing is the sharing of benefits from countries miners were distributed evenly to the state or the status of least-developed countries are not locked (land-locked states). There are zoning regulation and differentiation of species in an effort to make conservation measures, as well as special arrangements regarding pollution of the marine environment by mining activities in the area based KHL 1982, 1994 Agreement, The Mining Code (ISBA) and the principles that apply under customary international law.Keywords: Common Heritage of Mankind, Seabed Area, Mineral Resources.
Fisheries Conservation and Marine Protected Area Establishment in Indonesia Davina Oktivana
Padjadjaran Journal of International Law Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): Padjadjaran Journal of International Law, Volume 7, Number 1, January 2023
Publisher : International Law Department, Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/pjil.v7i1.1202

Abstract

Marine protected areas (MPAs) aim to protect marine ecosystems or habitats within ecologically meaningful boundaries. MPAs are based on the combination of the conservation of marine living resources and the protection of marine habitats or ecosystems. The objective of MPA is to balance diverse societal objectives by taking into account the knowledge and uncertainties about biotic, abiotic, and human components of ecosystems and their interactions and applying an integrated approach to fisheries within eco-relevant boundaries in an integrated manner. The traditional approach provided in 1982 LOCS (zonal management approach and species-based approach) needs to be revised to be implemented under the MPA concept to achieve MPA objectives. In comparison, the ecosystem-based and precautionary approaches are ideally suited to be applied with MPA conception. The most prominent feature of the precautionary approach is scientific evidence, which is essential for establishing a protected area. This paper is a review of Indonesia's implementation to achieve sustainable fisheries, particularly the environmental aspect. Particular attention must be given to the fact that there is no correlation between Indonesian MPAs and IFMAs. The RPJMN focuses on capture fish that take into account the MSY value and eliminate the constraints by strengthening management and institutionalization of IFMAs, optimizing fishery productivity, and harmonizing marine spatial planning, particularly in the coastal areas and small islands. This paper also discusses the impact of Indonesian maritime zones on the environment and marine areas. The results of the report show that Indonesian marine zones are vulnerable to IUUF, especially in the Natuna Sea, and the enforcement of the Indonesian laws and regulations focused on the IUFF could be better, but it can also be used to protect the violation in conservation areas. MMAF Regulation 22/2021 can be considered as one aspect required in EAFM to provide scientific evidence (TAC and MSY level) that enables sustainable development in fisheries.
Illegal Fishing Activities of the Run Zeng Vessel in Indonesia Surakusumah, Regan Meganata; Imamulhadi, Imamulhadi; Oktivana, Davina
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v8i2.13120

Abstract

In the last four years, the number of illegal fishing cases in Indonesia has relatively increased. The government is still working hard to catch the perpetrators of fisheries crimes that roam Indonesian waters. The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) reported that a Russian-flagged foreign fishing vessel named Run Zeng from China entered Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) to conduct illegal activities such as illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing practices, the use of trawling, and the deactivation of the Automatic Identification System (AIS). International environmental law requires countries to comply with rights and obligations related to environmental protection at the global level, including the marine environment. This research aims to specifically highlight the analysis of the environmental aspects of international law against the illegal activities of the Run Zeng vessel in Indonesia. By using normative juridical research methodology, which emphasizes the analysis of library materials in the form of secondary data. The results of this study indicate that the Run Zeng ship has carried out various illegal activities that violate the provisions of international conventions and laws and regulations in Indonesia. In law enforcement, Indonesia has adequate legal instruments to handle cases of environmental pollution by foreign vessels through bilateral agreements and national laws. This case has implications for Indonesia's commitment to realizing sustainable development in the marine and fisheries management sector, especially SDGs 14 Life Below Water through the concept of blue economy as outlined in the five priority programs of the MMAF.
Co-Authors Imamulhadi Surakusumah, Regan Meganata