Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Yudisial Jurnal Konstitusi Kajian Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Puguh Windrawan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Pergeseran Kekuasaan Tipologi Ketiga; Fenomena Kekuasaan Ke Arah Constitusional Heavy Windrawan, Puguh
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (533.716 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic system governance. With a solid perspective of balancing  state  power,  the  court  has  been set up to interpret and review of conformity of every act and regulation. In Indonesia, a constitutional court presence has an important meaning amid power shifting processes. As the supremacy to some extent moving away from the executive authority, the constitutional court appears as the most prominence body instead of legislative board. In accordance with its duties and functions, the institution is able to give juridical interpretations to examine every regulation against The Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia 1945.
Pergeseran Kekuasaan Tipologi Ketiga; Fenomena Kekuasaan Ke Arah Constitusional Heavy Puguh Windrawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (533.716 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk942

Abstract

The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic system governance. With a solid perspective of balancing  state  power,  the  court  has  been set up to interpret and review of conformity of every act and regulation. In Indonesia, a constitutional court presence has an important meaning amid power shifting processes. As the supremacy to some extent moving away from the executive authority, the constitutional court appears as the most prominence body instead of legislative board. In accordance with its duties and functions, the institution is able to give juridical interpretations to examine every regulation against The Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia 1945.
PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG KEBERADAAN LEMBAGA NEGARA Puguh Windrawan
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 7, No 1 (2014): CONFLICTUS LEGEM
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v7i1.95

Abstract

ABSTRAKPendapat Mahkamah Konstitusi terkait dengan keberadaan lembaga negara serta komisi negara bisa ditelaah melalui beberapa putusannya. Beberapa di antaranya adalah berkaitan dengan kewenangan Komisi Yudisial, keberadaan Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi, dan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia. Putusan terhadap keberadaan tiga lembaga tersebut menunjukkan bahwa ada persoalan tafsir hukum yang harus dikritisi. Dengan melihat tiga putusan terkait, Mahkamah Kontitusi menunjukkan bahwa yang bisa disebut sebagai lembaga negara adalah lembaga yang memang disebutkan secara nyata dalam UUD 1945. Meskipun demikian, ada beberapa hal yang harus dilihat secara kritis. Konsistensi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi saat menyidangkan perkara terkait dengan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia menjadi hal yang harus dipertimbangkan. Pada putusan pertama, menganggap Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia sebagai lembaga negara, akan tetapi dalam putusan selanjutnya menyatakan bukan sebagai lembaga negara. Di lain sisi, Mahkamah Konstitusi, sesuai dengan tugas kewenangannya juga bisa menyidangkan perkara berkaitan dengan lembaga negara. Meskipun, lembaga negara tersebut sederajat kedudukannya dengan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam struktur ketatanegaraan Indonesia.Kata kunci: lembaga negara, komisi negara, Mahkamah Konstitusi.ABSTRACTThe Constitutional Court’s viewpoint regarding the respective positions of some commissions as state institutions can be explored from its decisions Number 005/PUU-IV/2006, 006/PUU-IV/2006, and 030/SKLN-IV/2006. The three decisions set forth the issues of position of three institutions, which are the Judicial Commission, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and the Indonesian Broadcasting  Commission. From these decisions, there seem to be a question of legal interpretation that should be criticized. In these decisions, the Constitutional Court indicates that a state institution is that has been raised in the 1945 Constitution. Besides, there is another thing to stress. The Constitutional Court’s inconsistency the ruling of the case related to the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission must be considered as well. In its original decision, the Constitutional Court regards the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission as a state institution, but in the subsequent decisions, it does not. Indeed the Constitutional Court has the authority to review cases of a state institution, even when they both (the court and the commission) have equal positions in the constitutional state structure. Keywords: state institution, state commission, Constitutional Court.
Pergeseran Kekuasaan Tipologi Ketiga; Fenomena Kekuasaan Ke Arah Constitusional Heavy Puguh Windrawan
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 9, No 4 (2012)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (533.716 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk942

Abstract

The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic system governance. With a solid perspective of balancing  state  power,  the  court  has  been set up to interpret and review of conformity of every act and regulation. In Indonesia, a constitutional court presence has an important meaning amid power shifting processes. As the supremacy to some extent moving away from the executive authority, the constitutional court appears as the most prominence body instead of legislative board. In accordance with its duties and functions, the institution is able to give juridical interpretations to examine every regulation against The Constitution of The Republic of Indonesia 1945.
EVALUASI SISTEM DAN PROSES PENGAJARAN TERHADAP LULUSAN AKPOL 2006 – 2010 DI WILAYAH POLDA NUSA TENGGARA BARAT (NTB) Cecep Tedi Siswanto; Puguh Windrawan
Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2017): November
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (755.165 KB)

Abstract

This assessment is linked to the respondent answers given to the questions given. The question that is open and qualitatively reflect the depth of their thoughts on the situation at hand. Along with the fact that there are some things that concern in it. This is related to internal accountability that is in the body of the local police.      Like what is described by M. Adiel Ipda Aristo, Kanit Regident Then Bima City and Ipda Cita gift Sari, Chief of Unit 2 Satreskrim Idik West Lombok Police. Internal issues such as the perception of his colleagues to the position Ipda M. Adiel Aristo, which considers that the position is a "wetland". While Ipda Cita gift of Sari complained about the police in his unit were involved indirectly with drugs.      Internal accountability become one of the requirements that the police force be an institution which kredibel. Bagaimanapun also for police officers with paradigm still had not moved from the old and still engage in certain cases, the negative connotations and stigma is still attached to the institution in the public eye.In accordance with the concepts of accountability, then the top level should be able to resolve cases related to subordinates. Moreover, decisive action and their internal control, both the police personnel, to operations conducted and to the reporting of performance, accompanied by a system of sanctions and rewards, an absolute requirement that must be done.Being a thing that can not go unnoticed is the inconsistency of the respondents to the concept of human rights. They stated that the concept of human rights is actually needed in bridging the behavior of the police when dealing with the public. However, this attitude changed when the concept of human rights is then translated in the field. Some respondents considered the concept of human rights will collide with reality. It became one of the proofs that the objective and purpose of the issuance of Police Regulation No. 8 Year 2009 on Implementation Principles and Standards of Human Rights in the Implementation Task Indonesian National Police, has not been applied to the maximum on the idea 2006- 2010 graduate of the Police Academy.
Gagasan Judicial Review dan Terbentuknya Mahkamah Konstitusi di Indonesia Puguh Windrawan
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2013): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v2i1.1885

Abstract

The Constitutional Court plays a central role in the democratic systemgovernance. With a solid perspective of balancing state power, the court has been set upto interpret and review of conformity of every act and regulation. In Indonesia, aconstitutional court presence has an important meaning amid power shifting processes.As the supremacy to some extent moving away from the executive authority, theconstitutional court appears as the most prominence body instead of legislative board. Inaccordance with its duties and functions, the institution is able to give juridicalinterpretations to examine every regulation against The Constitution of The Republic ofIndonesia 1945.
Co-Authors Cecep Tedi Siswanto