Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Berkala Arkeologi Berkala Arkeologi
Mindra Faizaliskandiar
Unknown Affiliation
Earth & Planetary Sciences Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Krisis Dalam Arkeologi Indonesia Mindra Faizaliskandiar
Berkala Arkeologi Vol 12 No 1 (1991)
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2738.561 KB) | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v12i1.558

Abstract

Apakah arkeologi mempunyai paradigmanya sendiri? Sebuah pertanyaan mendasar lantas menjadi penting, arkeologi termasuk ilmu atau seni? Seolah menjawab pertanyaan ini, arkeolog Amerika James F. Deetz menulis: "As a part of cultural anthropology, archaeology is legitimately as social science" (Deetz 1971: 3). Akan tetapi sampal di sini masalahnya tidak lantas menjadi usai. Apakah hanya karena sebagai bagian dari ilmu antropologi budaya saja arkeologi dapat disebut ilmu?
Sebaran Tembikar Di Trowulan: Hasil Survei IFSA 1991-1993 Mindra Faizaliskandiar
Berkala Arkeologi Vol 15 No 3 (1995): Edisi Khusus
Publisher : Balai Arkeologi Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2814.962 KB) | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v15i3.688

Abstract

It should be acknowledged that the validity and reliability of the archaeological remains on the surface of the Trowulan Site as systematic survey research data is still in doubt, because the taphonomic process that has taken place in the last few decades, mainly due to wild and negative human activity at this site, has been going on intensively in a relatively long period of time. However, such research should still be held at the Trowulan Site to meet the standard of spatial research procedures (spatial archeology). The results of this study will establish empirically the level of confidence of the surface data, and possibly those under the soil of the Trowulan Site.
SEBARAN TEMBIKAR DI TROWULAN: HASIL SURVEI IFSA 1991-1993 Mindra Faizaliskandiar
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 15 No. 3 (1995)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v15i3.688

Abstract

It should be acknowledged that the validity and reliability of the archaeological remains on the surface of the Trowulan Site as systematic survey research data is still in doubt, because the taphonomic process that has taken place in the last few decades, mainly due to wild and negative human activity at this site, has been going on intensively in a relatively long period of time. However, such research should still be held at the Trowulan Site to meet the standard of spatial research procedures (spatial archeology). The results of this study will establish empirically the level of confidence of the surface data, and possibly those under the soil of the Trowulan Site.
KRISIS DALAM ARKEOLOGI INDONESIA Mindra Faizaliskandiar
Berkala Arkeologi Vol. 12 No. 1 (1991)
Publisher : BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30883/jba.v12i1.558

Abstract

Apakah arkeologi mempunyai paradigmanya sendiri? Sebuah pertanyaan mendasar lantas menjadi penting, arkeologi termasuk ilmu atau seni? Seolah menjawab pertanyaan ini, arkeolog Amerika James F. Deetz menulis: "As a part of cultural anthropology, archaeology is legitimately as social science" (Deetz 1971: 3). Akan tetapi sampal di sini masalahnya tidak lantas menjadi usai. Apakah hanya karena sebagai bagian dari ilmu antropologi budaya saja arkeologi dapat disebut ilmu?
Co-Authors