Eko Pujiyono
Faculty Of Law Hang Tuah University, Surabaya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Kedudukan Korporasi Rumah Sakit dalam Tanggung Gugat Kelalaian Eko Pujiyono
Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan VOLUME 1 ISSUE 2
Publisher : Faculty of Law- Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/jhek.v1i2.35

Abstract

Rumah sakit bukan semata tempat praktik pelayanan kesehatan namun memiliki kedudukan sebagai subyek hukum. Subyek hukum rumah sakit berbentuk korporasi yang berbadan hukum. Karakteristik badan hukum korporasi rumah sakit mempunyai perbedaan  dengan korporasi lainnya. Hal ini dipengaruhi oleh struktur organ korporasi rumah sakit yang membedakan pemilik, organisasi manajerial, dan pelayanan. Oleh karena itu, penerapan tanggung gugat atas kelalaian sebagaimana diatur pada pasal 46 UU no 44 tahun 2009 harus dikaji secara tepat dengan mempertimbangkan karakteristik korporasi dan sifat transaksi. Pada praktik putusan pengadilan, hakim membebankan kerugian tidak semata pada korporasi namun juga pada pribadi dokter pelayanan. Selain itu, pada beberapa putusan pengadilan belum ada keseragaman perihal konsep korporasi yang ditempatkan sebagai tergugat dalam korporasi. Berdasarkan hal tersebut penerapan dan tafsir hukum pasal 46 UU no 44 tahun 2009 harus dikaji secara proporsional agar tanggung gugat korporasi rumah sakit dapat memenuhi konsep keadilan.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pidana Pelanggaran Otonomi Pasien Eko Pujiyono
Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan VOLUME 2 NOMOR 1
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum - Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/jhek.v2i1.50

Abstract

Patient autonomy is an important part in maintaining human dignity and in legal engagements in the medical field, patient autonomy is a form of freedom to deal with the patient’s sick condition. The freedom inherent in humans must have an element of responsibility, including patient autonomy inherent in sick people and must be accountable for human values in health services. The purpose of the study is to examine whether violations of the principle of patient autonomy are a form of crime that can be accounted for, with a normative legal research type using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary legal materials are laws and regulations using legislation and regulations, while secondary legal materials are from reserch results, journals and legal books. The result of the research is that the laws and regulations in the field of hospital and medical have not explicitly regulated the violation of the principle of autonomy as a criminal act because in the Criminal Code, the Medical Practice Law, the Hospital Law does not explicitly formulate punishment in the event of a violation of patient autonomy. Criminal liability by doctors in the Criminal Code does not have a causal correlation between unlawful nature and criminal responsibility forviolations of patient autonomy, so the search for causality is fundamental in determining the elements of unlawful nature and criminal responsibility. The application of offense articles in the Criminal Code needs to be avoided on the basis of special considerations for the application of health law because it contains health ethics with moral characteristics.
Restatement Kelalaian Dalam Malpraktik Medis Eko Pujiyono
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 23 ISSUE 1
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v23i1.171

Abstract

Research on restatement of negligence in medical malpractice aims to address the issue of uncertainty over legal adjudication in determining the unlawful nature of medical negligence. This research is an effort  to create a clear explanation about the prominent concept of criminal law that are more fairly in the law enforcement of the criminal law code on negligence cases. In addition, this research is expected to create a new approach in the development of legal methods that is a system of assessments and legal discourse by universities, practitioners and other health law observers to get a real and fair result. This research  uses a normative approach and based on conceptual category, regulations, and court decisions. These three elements are reviewed together by considering universal legal principles. A verification  of unlawful nature in medical malpractice has different characteristics rather than the ordinary  crimes proof. The sui generis characteristic in health law has an impact on legal constructions toward negligence cases. A Proving negligence in Health Law requires a medico-legal approach. Legal adjudication of cases of negligence in medical practice in Indonesia requires adjustments to the legal doctrines that apply in the science of health law. This legal doctrine has applied as universal doctrin and be a part of studying to find unlawful aspect in criminal acts relating with the field of health care law.