Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Pengangkatan Kembali Jabatan Notaris Pasca Menjalani Sanksi Pemberhentian Sementara Wibisono, Richard Angling; Armiwulan, Hesti
UNES Law Review Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v7i4.2425

Abstract

Penulisan ini membahas pengangkatan kembali bagi jabatan Notaris yang telah menjalani sanksi pemberhentian sementara mengenai ketidaksesuaian UUJN dengan Permenkumham Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 terkait pengangkatan kembali Notaris yang telah menjalani sanksi pemberhentian sementara serta akibat hukum akta yang dibuat Notaris yang telah menjalani sanksi pemberhentian sementara namun belum dilakukan pengangkatan kembali. Perihal pengangkatan kembali Notaris yang telah menjalani sanksi pemberhentian sementara terdapat ketidaksesuaian karena UUJN menentukan dilaksanakan pengangkatan kembali sedangkan Permenkumham Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tidak ada mengatur terkait hal tersebut, terjadi kekosongan hukum dan tidak menjamin kepastian hukum. Akibat hukum akta yang dibuat Notaris yang belum melakukan pengangkatan kembali maka keabsahan akta tersebut patut dipertanyakan. Akta itu tetap sah hingga adanya pihak yang mempermasalahkan dan menjadi tidak sah dan berkekuatan dibawah tangan karena belum dilakukan pengangkatan kembali sehingga tidak berwenang menjalankan jabatan Notaris.
Artificial Intelligence and Its Challenges To Elections In Indonesia: A Legal Analysis Armiwulan, Hesti; Rahman, Rofi Aulia; Prabowo, Valentino Nathanael; Hajdú, József
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 6 NO. 2 JULY 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v6i2.24243

Abstract

The improper utilization of AI technology poses difficulties to democracy, particularly the growing threat of unjust elections, exemplified by the deployment of bot accounts and deep fakes during electoral processes. Hence, it is crucial to build a strong and comprehensive framework to regulate the utilization of AI technology in Indonesia's political process. This article analyzes four main topics: (a) the advancement of AI technology and its connection to elections; (b) the influence of AI technology on election principles; (c) the pressing need for regulating AI in elections; and (d) the possibilities and difficulties of regulating AI technology within Indonesia's legal framework. The paper employs doctrinal legal research to examine the necessity of regulating AI technology in the context of conducting elections, taking into account the constitutional framework, established principles, and democratic election norms. The result shows that irresponsible use of AI technology remains a menace to democratic election ideals, and Indonesia must establish adequate legal mechanisms to tackle the problems stemming from the improper use of AI technology in the political process. The regulation of AI technology can be initiated by introducing a bill specifically focused on artificial intelligence (AI). This process should also involve the synchronization and harmonization of election rules, including election laws, laws governing the election of governors, regents, and mayors, laws concerning political parties, and other implementing regulations such as those established by the General Election Commission and the Election Supervisory Board.