Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

From Iran and Saudi Arabia to Indonesia: The Translation of Shi‘ite and Wahhabi Literature in Contemporary Indonesia Syahnan, Mhd.; Mukhsin, Abd.; Ja'far, Ja'far
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2023.13.2.261-280

Abstract

This study examines the translation of Shi‘ite and Wahhabi literature in Indonesia. This is a literature study. The primary data was obtained by examining the record of translated and published titles in Indonesian. This study refers to the theory of Mehdi Nakosteen, R.G.A. Dolby, and Abdul Munip regarding the transmission of knowledge through translation activities, their phases, and motives. This study found that these books from Iran and Saudi Arabia, covering various Islamic knowledge, are published and distributed in Indonesia by affiliated and unaffiliated publishers in order to introduce their ideas and doctrines to the wider Muslim community in Indonesia, using the Indonesian language as the medium of transmission. This transmission of knowledge through translation takes place through the awareness, interest, and adoption phases, and has religious, educational, economic, ideological, and stimulative-provocative motivations.
Pelaksanaan Kurban Mayit Menurut Imam An-Nawawi dan Imam Ibnu At-Taimiyah Studi Kasus Desa Tanjung Baru Kecamatan Tanjung Morawa Elika, Dinda; Mukhsin, Abd.
Nagari Law Review Vol 8 No 1 (2024): Nagari Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Andalas University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/nalrev.v.8.i.1.p.15-28.2024

Abstract

This research examines the implementation of sacrificial services for the deceased, a practice that has sparked differing opinions among Islamic scholars. The background of this issue stems from varying interpretations of religious evidence and jurisprudential understanding between Imam An-Nawawi and Imam Ibn Taymiyyah. The research questions are: (1) What are the views of Imam An-Nawawi and Imam Ibn Taymiyyah regarding sacrifice for the deceased? (2) What legal bases and arguments are used by these two imams? (3) How is this practice implemented in the community of Tanjung Baru Village, Tanjung Morawa District? The research method employed is a comparative empirical normative sociological study. Primary data was obtained directly from the works of Imam An-Nawawi and Imam Ibn Taymiyyah, as well as through observations and interviews at the research site. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively using a comparative approach The results reveal significant differences between the views of the two imams. Imam An-Nawawi permits sacrifice for the deceased, both with and without a will, based on hadiths about giving charity for the dead. Meanwhile, Imam Ibn Taymiyyah rejects this argument and holds a different perspective. In Tanjung Baru Village, the practice of sacrifice for the deceased is still carried out by some community members, although understanding of its legal basis varies. This study suggests the need for further education of the community about the variety of scholarly opinions on this matter, and encourages dialogue among local religious leaders to achieve a more comprehensive understanding.
Methods of Analyzing Judges' Decisions in Normative Legal Research Case-based Approach and Islamic Law Sukiati, Sukiati; Mukhsin, Abd.; Al-Farizi, Dava
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), February
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v6i3.1972

Abstract

This study aims to examine how decision analysis studies should be conducted. In addition to examining the case approach in normative legal research, which is a commonly used approach in decision analysis studies, this study was also conducted to investigate the methods and characteristics of decision analysis. Using qualitative and document research methods, data was collected through focus group discussions and documentation. This study found that decision analysis research is specifically a case-specific study, possibly using philosophical and conceptual approaches simultaneously. The steps of decision analysis research also specifically follow the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Attention and Conclusion) method. This study is expected to contribute to the development of the discourse on legal research methodology with its various approaches, especially approaches that have been introduced in normative legal research. Practically, this study is expected to provide guidance for students to conduct normative legal research with a case approach, especially in decision analysis research. The results of this study are also expected to be a guide for supervisors to guide students who conduct normative legal research with a case approach, especially research on the analysis of judges' decisions.
Peran Suami Disabilitas dalam Menafkahi Keluarga Melalui Tindakan Mengemis: Perspektif Hukum Islam Adilla, Nurul; Mukhsin, Abd.
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 28 No 1: Desember 2024 - Mei 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v28i1.513

Abstract

This research examines the phenomenon of husbands with disabilities who provide for their families through the act of begging in Sidorejo Hilir Urban Village from the perspective of Islamic law. The main objective of this research is to analyze the practice of husbands with disabilities fulfilling financial support obligations and to explore the local community’s views on this phenomenon. This research uses a juridical-empirical approach with a qualitative method. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with four husbands with disabilities and several residents and community leaders. Secondary data were collected from a literature study of Islamic legal sources, such as the Qur’an, Hadith, and books of fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). The results showed that physical limitations and barriers to access to decent work forced husbands with disabilities to beg in order to fulfil their family financial support obligations. From Islamic law’s perspective, begging can be justified due to the condition of dharuriyyat (necessity), although this permissibility is temporary and situational. The Sidorejo Hilir Urban Village community shows various views, ranging from empathy and tolerance to criticism that emphasizes the importance of independence. This research concludes that the condition of dharuriyyat justifies begging as an exception to the general rule while still prioritizing the principle of izzah (self-dignity). The implication of this research is the need for strategic steps, especially from the government and related institutions, to create inclusive economic empowerment programs for persons with disabilities so that they can escape the condition of dharuriyyat and fulfil their financial support obligations more dignifiedly.
TINJAUAN HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM PASAL 412 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KOHABITASI Ritonga, Rahul Sani; Mukhsin, Abd.
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 8 No. 3 (2024): September-Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v8i3.9934

Abstract

This research examines the regulation of cohabitation in Section 412 of Law No. 1 of 2023 and compares it with adultery sanctions in Islamic criminal law. The background of the problem raised is that Article 412 provides leniency for adultery offenders compared to Article 411 which regulates adultery, where the punishment for cohabitation offenders is lighter and the proof process uses an absolute complaint offense. This study employs normative legal techniques. with descriptive data analysis techniques. The results The discussion shows that in the review of Islamic criminal law, cohabitation offenders are considered equivalent to adultery offenders. In Islam, cohabitation is an extension of the crime of adultery so that the criminal sanctions are equalized, both for muḥṣan (married) and ghairu muḥṣan (unmarried). The perpetrator of cohabitation is subject to The perpetrators of cohabitation are subject to 100 lashes or stoning according to the category of adultery. The study's findings indicates that the regulation of cohabitation in Article 412 of Law Number 1 Year 2023 has significant differences with Islamic criminal law. Article 412 provides a lower penalty than Article 411 on adultery, in contrast to Islamic criminal law which equates criminal sanctions for cohabitation offenders with adultery offenders, namely 100 lashes or stoning according to the type, whether the category of zina muḥṣan or ghairu muḥṣan.