Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal terAs Law Review: Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Julian Daniel
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
DAMPAK KONFLIK RUSIA-UKRAINA TERHADAP PERJANJIAN PERSAHABATAN ANTAR RUSIA DAN UKRAINA Julian Daniel; Arlina Permanasari
terAs Law Review : Jurnal Hukum Humaniter dan HAM Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Mei 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (618.552 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/teraslrev.v4i1.15056

Abstract

International relations or international relations are human interactions between nations eitherindividually, or in groups that are carried out directly or indirectly. The existence of a number ofmajor countries in this world is a reality that cannot be denied anymore. The inequality of naturalresources and industries that encourage countries to work together gives rise to a norm so thateach country is not only concerned with its interests, but all actions or relations made with othercountries must pay attention to the rules of international law that arise both based oninternational treaties, international customs, general legal principles and judgments of scholars,international organizations or international institutions so as to achieve a legal order that doesnot interfere with peace, international security and justice.
PENINJAUAN KEMBALI KEDUA DALAM PERKARA PIDANA BERDASARKAN SURAT EDARAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 2014: Second Review In Criminal Cases Based On Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 7 Of 2014 Julian Daniel; Setiyono
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 3 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i3.21257

Abstract

The right of review is the right of the perpetrator, in contrast to ordinary legal remedies whose application is enshrined in Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code. However, in SEMA Number 7 of 2014, a review can be submitted on the grounds that there is a conflict between the decisions. Through Decision 467 Pk/Pid.Sus/2021, the panel of judges decided that the application was unacceptable. From the description above, the author intends to analyze two main issues to be examined, namely whether the decision is in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code, and whether the reason for the decision is not acceptable to the application. In this paper, the author conducts a descriptive analysis method. Based on the discussion presented in this paper, it is concluded that the decision is not in line with Article 79 of Law Number 14 of 1985 concerning the Supreme Court, using the reason that there is no contradiction submitted as evidences as required in SEMA Number 7 of 2014
Co-Authors Arlina Permanasari setiyono