Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Strategy of Padang City Baznas In Collecting Non ASN Zakat Funds Ibnu Amin; Faisal Efendi; Mardianton Mardianton
AL-FALAH : Journal of Islamic Economics Vol 7, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alfalah.v7i2.5292

Abstract

Purpose: This study analyzes how the Padang City Baznas strategy in collecting zakat funds from Non-ASN, Padang City Baznas is able to collect so many zakat funds, so this can be a reference for Baznas in Indonesia.Design/Method/Approach: The author uses data collection techniques in the form of observations and interviews. The data analysis technique used in this study is descriptive and qualitative, which aims to describe the real events that occur in the field.Findings: The Head of Collection Division has a contract employee, where the contract employee is not the same as an ordinary employee, the contract employee receives an honorarium in one month amounting to Rp. 2,100,000 (two million one hundred million rupiah) and must be able to collect zakat as much as Rp. 20,000,000.00 (twenty million rupiah) per month and meaning that within one year the contract employee must be able to collect zakat funds of Rp. 240,000,000.00, (two hundred and forty million rupiah) per year, but if the contract employee is able to exceed the specified limit then the contract employee gets or is given 5% of as many as these excess. In addition, the strategy carried out by Baznas Padang City is to spread in the form of boxes and piggy bank in various places such as restaurants and shops.Originality/Values: The contribution of this research can provide valuable information related to education financing and become a reference of choice for other schools in the expenditure costs that have been set by the government and do not ignore the provisions in sharia economy.
Mashlahah Married Pregnant Perspective Article 53 Compilation of Islamic Law Ibnu Amin; Faisal Efendi; Hertasmaldi Hertasmaldi
FOKUS Jurnal Kajian Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Vol 7, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jf.v7i2.5364

Abstract

This study aims to see how Mashlahah Based on Syara' and the (KHI) regarding the marriage of pregnant women out of wedlock. In this modern era, many women are pregnant even though they are not married. Islam provides all provisions for the benefit of mankind, so its teachings are called Salih likulli Zaman wa Makan. In Mashlahah Based on Syara' (Mashlahah Mu'tabarah, Mulgah, Mursalah) and Article 53 of the KHI indicate that this is a means to maintain the honor of women and their families after an opportunity that damages honor, namely pregnancy out of wedlock. This is also reinforced by the closeness of marriage without having to wait for the birth of a child in the womb. Based on the description above, it can be seen that the benefits listed in Article 53 of the KHI tend to be related to human interests to eliminate difficulties or narrowness that befall humans. Mashlahah seen from KHI regarding women who are married pregnant is the protection of lineage rights. Protection of honor, pregnant women out of wedlock who do not immediately marry the person who impregnated her will have an impact on the loss of honor for herself and her family.
The Law Between Secularism and Theology Ibnu Amin
NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance Vol 2, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/negrei.v2i2.5282

Abstract

This study aims to describe the legal nature between secularism and theology. The research method used is a literature study with a qualitative descriptive approach using content analytics. The results of the research are secularism and theology is part of the school of natural law (kodrati). Secularism i.e. the rejection of religious thought from life even denies the existence of God from the reality of life whereas the center of life through reason and even secularism can resemble a new religion, hence the law is secular based solely on the will of the people's reason alone. That the legal nature of the theological dimension in the Islamic perspective, namely the narrative based on the revelation of Allah and the Sunnah of the Apostle, shows that a set of rules is extracted from and based on the revelation of the Quran and Sunnah. Law in Islam is seen as having two dimensions, namely Shari'a and fiqh. Sharia is fundamental and absolute values, impossible to change, while jurisprudence is a special field formulated by fuqaha'. Secularism in the sense of rationalism in Islam has always been guided by nash which is like thinking of a mujtahid, so the result is not too far from the truth values that nash teaches. Western rationalism, on the other hand, relies solely on the ability of reason alone, so that it is often found that a law is finally amended again because it is incompatible with the values of justice, good and bad.
Comparative Analysis of the Marriage Age Dispensation in Islamic Family Law in Indonesia and Algeria Ibnu Amin; Nurus Shalihin; M Sholihin; YS Tenra Septu Amin; Lendrawati Lendrawati
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 30, No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v30i1.11293

Abstract

This study aims to analyze comparatively the legal policy regarding the granting of marriage dispensation in the Islamic family law system in two Muslim-majority countries, namely Indonesia and Algeria. The focus of the study is directed at how regulations in each country regulate the age limit for marriage and the mechanism for granting marriage age dispensations, as well as how these norms are rooted in the principles of Islamic law that are influenced by the national legal structure. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach and comparative legal analysis, through an examination of laws, implementing regulations, official state documents and classical and contemporary Islamic legal literature. The results of the study show that Indonesia through Law Number 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law Number 16 of 2019 sets the age of marriage of 19 years for men and women, but still opens up dispensation space through the judicial channels as stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019. Algeria in the revised Code de la Famille in 2005 sets a minimum age of 19 years without distinction between sex, with the granting of a more administrative dispensation governed by the civil courts, but giving judges broader authority to give consideration to their verdicts without more specific technical instructions. Both countries use the principle of benefit as a normative justification, but differences in social, political and legal contexts make the implementation of marriage practiced in different frameworks. The conclusion of this study is that the legal formulation of marriage dispensation in Indonesia and Algeria reflects legal ijtihad efforts that are adaptive to changing times, but still require social control and protection of children's rights within the framework of justice and benefit values.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara komparatif kebijakan hukum mengenai pemberian dispensasi nikah dalam sistem hukum keluarga Islam di dua negara berpenduduk mayoritas Muslim, yakni Indonesia dan Aljazair. Fokus kajian diarahkan pada bagaimana regulasi di masing-masing negara mengatur batas usia perkawinan dan mekanisme pemberian dispensasi usia nikah, serta bagaimana norma tersebut berakar pada prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam yang dipengaruhi oleh struktur hukum nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan perbandingan hukum (comparative legal analysis), melalui telaah terhadap undang-undang, peraturan pelaksana, dokumen resmi negara serta literatur hukum Islam klasik dan kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan utama Indonesia dan Aljazair dalam dispensasi nikah terletak pada mekanisme peradilan, ruang diskresi hakim, dan orientasi perlindungan anak. Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 menetapkan usia menikah 19 tahun serta membuka dispensasi melalui mekanisme yudisial yang diatur rinci dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019. Regulasi ini menekankan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak melalui pertimbangan psikologis, kesehatan, pendidikan, dan sosial sehingga diskresi hakim lebih terbatas secara prosedural. Sebaliknya, Aljazair melalui Code de la Famille  revisi 2005 juga menetapkan usia minimal 19 tahun, tetapi tanpa pedoman teknis khusus mengenai dispensasi. Akibatnya, hakim memiliki ruang diskresi lebih luas dalam mempertimbangkan alasan sosial, budaya, dan kemaslahatan keluarga. Temuan ini menunjukkan Indonesia lebih berorientasi pada perlindungan anak berbasis regulasi, sedangkan Aljazair menekankan fleksibilitas penafsiran hakim dalam hukum keluarga Islam.