Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Danadyaksa: Post Modern Economy Journal Res Judicata Law Review Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi
Andika Putra Eskanugraha
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The Role of the Regional Advisory and Supervisory Board Regarding the Responsibilities of Temporary Land Deed Making Officials in Storing Protocols Ahmad Firdaus; Rosita Indrayti; Andika Putra Eskanugraha
Res Judicata Law Review Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Res Judicata Law Review
Publisher : Wiraraja University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71370/rjlr.v1i2.17

Abstract

PPAT is an important part of the land registration system in Indonesia which has the authority to make authentic deeds. The main task of PPAT is to make deeds stating that certain legal acts related to land ownership have been fulfilled which will be the basis for data on land transfer registration. In order to maintain quality and continue to carry out its duties carefully, guidance and supervision are needed for PPAT. Based on Article 1 of PMNA/KBPN 2/2018, the Minister authorizes MP2D to carry out guidance and supervision of PPAT in the form of conveying policies that have been determined by the Minister regarding the implementation of PPAT duties, socialization, dissemination, inspections to PPAT offices, and guidance on the implementation of PPAT duties and functions in accordance with the Code of Ethics. Guidance and supervision of PPAT as regulated in the ministerial regulation also applies to PPATS, Substitute PPAT, and Special PPAT. However, there are still many legal problems found, such as not reading or explaining the deed in front of the parties and witnesses, and especially related to the storage of PPAT protocols. The normative research method used in this study is the type of normative juridical legal research using 2 (two) legal approaches, namely the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The Result is MP2D plays a role in supervising PPAT, especially PPATS in carrying out its duties to ensure that PPATS has carried out its duties and functions as mandated by the Head of the Land Office, to maintain and ensure that services continue to run in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, ensure that professional ethics are well maintained, minimize violations, provide understanding, improve discipline and service to PPATS, especially related to maintaining the PPATS protocol which is a state archive that must be maintained, cared for and stored properly and safely.
The Characteristics of the Notarial Profession as a Provider of Pro Bono Legal Services For Indigent Communities Andika Putra Eskanugraha; Widodo Ekatjahjana; Fendi Setyawan
Danadyaksa: Post Modern Economy Journal Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Post Modern Economy Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Bustanul Ulum Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69965/danadyaksa.v3i1.260

Abstract

This study examines the notarial office as both a legal profession and a Public Official as stipulated in the Law on Notarial Office (Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris/UUJN). The concepts of “profession” and “Public Official” as attached to the Notary have distinctive characteristics within the Indonesian context. As a legal professional, the Notary performs duties professionally to serve the public in the field of private (civil) legal services within the scope of his or her authority. These legal services are remunerated through honoraria paid by members of the public, the amount of which is regulated by the UUJN and the professional organization. In providing legal services to the public, Notaries are obliged to render services free of charge to indigent persons. This obligation is regulated under Article 37 of the UUJN, which also prescribes sanctions for non-compliance. Through the UUJN, the Government facilitates economically disadvantaged members of society to ensure the legal protection of their rights in transactions and legal acts that require authentic evidence in the form of a notarial deed. However, the UUJN does not clearly explain the criteria and requirements for determining who qualifies as an “indigent” person eligible to receive free legal services from a Notary. Furthermore, the prevailing laws and regulations do not specify the types or scope of notarial legal services that may be provided to economically disadvantaged persons under this scheme. Accordingly, the legislation should more carefully regulate the subjects eligible to receive free notarial legal assistance, while still taking into account eligibility requirements, the scope of services that may be provided, and service standards to be applied by Notaries when rendering pro bono legal services to indigent persons.
Kekuatan Sertipikat Hak atas Tanah sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Objek Pengadaan Tanah bagi Kepentingan Umum Antikowati Antikowati; Ulfa Rohmati; Andika Putra Eskanugraha
Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL KAJIAN KONSTITUSI
Publisher : Department of Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law, University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkk.v2i2.33970

Abstract

Sertipikat hak atas tanah merupakan alat bukti yang kuat sebagaimana dimuat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, dan sertipikat tersebut sah sebagai alat pembuktian mutlak serta tidak dapat diganggu gugat di kemudian hari. Kalimat “tidak dapat diganggu gugat” tersebut yang kemudian berpotensi melahirkan ketidakadilan bagi pihak ketiga apabila ia merupakan pemilik sah atas bidang tanah yang dijadikan objek pengadaan tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kesesuaian undang-undang tentang pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan guna kepentingan umum dengan sistem pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia dan akibat hukum jika ada pihak yang berkeberatan terhadap bukti kepemilikan benda pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Metode pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi literatur dengan analisis deduktif. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa undang-undang tentang pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum tidak sesuai dengan sistem pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia yang menyebabkan jika ada pihak yang berkeberatan dengan sertifikat sebagai bukti kepemilikan. objek pengadaan tanah, maka pihak tersebut akan kehilangan hak atas tanah beserta ganti kerugiannya. kerugian atas pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah apabila pihak yang berkeberatan dapat memberikan bukti-bukti lain yang dapat melemahkan kekuatan pembuktian sertifikat.Kata Kunci: Sertifikat; Pendaftaran Tanah; Pembebasan Tanah.A land title certificate is a strong piece of evidence as stated in statutory regulations, and the certificate is valid as absolute evidence and cannot be contested in the future. The sentence "cannot be contested" then has the potential to give rise to injustice for third parties if they are the legal owners of the plot of land that is the object of land acquisition. This research aims to determine the compatibility of the law regarding land acquisition for development for public purposes with the land registration system in Indonesia and the legal consequences if there are parties who object to proof of ownership of land procurement objects for development for public purposes. The method used in this research is normative juridical using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Method of collecting legal materials through literature study with deductive analysis. From the research results, it can be concluded that the law regarding land acquisition for development for the public interest is not in accordance with the land registration system in Indonesia, which causes parties to object to the certificate as proof of ownership. the object of land acquisition, then the party will lose rights to the land along with compensation. losses due to the implementation of land acquisition if the objecting party can provide other evidence that can weaken the evidentiary strength of the certificate.Keywords: Certificate; Land Registration; Land Acquisition.
Co-Authors Ahmad Firdaus Antikowati Antikowati Fendi Setyawan Rosita Indrayti Ulfa Rohmati Widodo Ekatjahjana