Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Hukum Adigama

ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUSKAN PERKARA PIDANA NARKOTIKA YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANGGOTA TENTARA NASIONAL INDONESIA PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 50-K/PM.III-16/AL/IV/2015 DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 53-K/PM-I-03/AD/IV/2014 Jeski Wilson; Dian Adriawan DG Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8889

Abstract

This study discusses the Analysis of Judge Considerations in Deciding Narcotics Criminal Cases Conducted by Members of the TNI in Decision Number 50-K / PM.III-16 / AL / IV / 2015 Decision number 53-K / PM-I-03 / AD / IV / 2014. The problem that arises is how the judge's consideration in handling and deciding cases of narcotic crime involving TNI personnel in both cases? Based on the results of the study that the judge in both cases of misuse of narcotics crime by members of the TNI whose case was tried through a military court on case Number: 50-K / PM.III-16 / AL / IV / 2015 with the defendants Tku Agus Slamet and case Number: 53-K / PM-I-03 / AD / IV / 2014 with the accused Sergeant Ismail it can be concluded that the judge's judgment in the criminal prosecution of narcotic offenders refers to the quality and quantity or at least the amount of evidence (narcotics owned or consumed) and look at the time span when the perpetrators consume narcotics (only once without repeating / repeatedly) in a relatively short time.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KORPORASI OLEH DIREKSI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 003/PIDANA. KHUSUS-TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI/2018. PT.DKI) Rani Asmara; Dian Adriawan DG Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8908

Abstract

Criminal liability by the Board of Directors stipulated in article 2 paragraph (1) of law number 31 of 1999 Jo Law No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of corruption crimes against the case of corruption crimes contained in the ruling of a court number 003/Pid. Sus-TPK/2018/PT. DKI to maintain the intermediary of the officers because the legal entity is always realized through human deeds, so that the delegation of criminal liability contained in humans with this is represented by directors in accordance with the provisions of article 1 number 4 Law No. 40 2007 year about limited liability company. Therefore, the problems that need to be studied further, namely as follows: How is the corporate responsibility of the directors of corruption against criminal acts? To examine the problem, the author uses normative research methods. The results of the study indicated that the Board of Directors may have requested a criminal liability dispute in accordance with the provisions of article 2 paragraph (1) article 18 paragraph (1) and (2)  31 of 1999 Jo Act No. 20 of 2001 on the Eradication of criminal corruption. The author concluded that the criminal liability against corruption crimes was carried out by the Board of directors or the administration, because in the case of corporations can only be penalized by criminal sanctions relating to compensations, because the corporation is a legal entity that cannot be held to be criminal liability in the form of prison confinement and has no outward body form.
PENERAPAN SANKSI TERHADAP KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN DALAM KUHP DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERKEBUNAN DALAM PUTUSAN PENGADILAN SIMALUNGUN NOMOR 590/ PID.B/2019/PN SIM Abastian Martua; Dian Adriawan DG Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8930

Abstract

The application of sanctions in criminal cases involves one of the offenses stipulated in the Criminal Code in which all losses and penalties for the offense are regulated, but in the case of safeguards related to the losses incurred for the offense and less than Rp. 2,500,000, it will be included in minor criminal offenses which regulate further in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2012, but in practice many cases of theft of tipiring but other legal rules are sought in order to rule out tiping as in reported cases relating to minor acts but it requires a lex specialist Act Invite Plantation to exclude tipiring. How the Problems of Trial in Light Elections Arise in Kuhp with the Housing Law in the Decision of the District Court Simalungun Number 590 / Pid.b / 2019 / PN Sim. The author uses normative legal research methods. This research is descriptive analysis. Source of data used are primary data obtained from sources and secondary data from the results of library studies.. The author of the Supreme Court and the Panel of Judges further proves the existence of PERMA No. 2 of 2012 to support the enforcement of acts of violence in each case and also to support the application of minor criminal offenses and the application of lex specialists and legislators to more content in making each law making. only take from the rules that already apply in society.
ANALISIS LIMITASI LOCUS DAN TEMPUS DELICTI DALAM DELIK PENIPUAN YANG TERJADI DI LUAR NEGERI (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 58/PK/PID/2018) Philbert Audric Deigo; Dian Adriawan DG Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i1.9119

Abstract

This studies discuses the Analysist Limitation Location and Time of Fraud that Occurred Outside Indonesia using Supreme Court Verdict Number 58/PK/PID/2018 as the material of studies. Problem that arises is how does limitaion location and time of criminal act works if someone commit crime outside of Indonesia’s Juridiction? Investigator have to comprehend these two contituents because it’s a critical element that’s drive the criminal procedural law. In this era of technology fraud can be nowhere near the victims, therefore investigation going to take more effort and time. Investigator as the Government’s representative must have understood the principle in crime from all angle of aspect. Government especially diplomatic part must have realized this problem and have it solved a long time ago by proposing bilateral agreements to those country that have potential to become locus and tempus of criminal act, because the process take years only for ordinary fraud case that’s not have any complexity at all.
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP ALAT BUKTI VISUM ET REPERTUM PSIKIATRIKUM DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINGGI BANJARMASIN NOMOR 42/PID/2017/PT BJM) Yitro Daniel; Dian Adriawan Dg Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (819.716 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6684

Abstract

Based on Decision Number 20 / Pid.B / 2017 PN.Mrh has reported rape issued by the wife of Suwito Budi Santoso while the wife of Suwito Budi Santoso is named Sumaryati. However, Decision Number 42 / PID / 2017 / PT.BJM, the Banjarmasin High Court Judge Council acquitted 7 defendants who were not proven in rape cases. However, in the court's ruling, the Banjarmasin High Court contained anomalies that differed from the Verdict of the Marbahan District Court, namely from the expert's statement and the results of the post mortem psychiatric review. The problem is how is the juridical analysis of the evidence evidence and psychiatric repertum in the case of rape (case study of the Decision of the High Court in banjaran 42 / PID / 2017 / PT BJM)? The author approves this problem using normative research methods supported by expert interview data. The author creates in Article 184 the Criminal Procedure Code valid evidence is divided into 5 (five), which consists of legal evidence categorized Letters which are translated Article 187 and in Perma No 3 of 2017 in Article 4 to be discussed by the Judge. The author asks that for Law Enforcement, to pay more attention to what matters are the contents of the legislation. Investigators, Public Prosecutors, Judges, and government institutions that are involved in the tools of the post mortem and psychiatric repertum in the crime of rape, must really realize the contents of the agreement. So that the legal certainty given by the State to the community can be fully accepted
PERBUATAN PIDANA TERHADAP PENGEDARAN KOSMETIKA YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI IZIN EDAR DAN TIDAK MEMILIKI KEAHLIAN DALAM PRAKTIK KEFARMASIAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN Andi Nugraha; Dian Adriawan Dg Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (865.757 KB) | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5241

Abstract

Recent criminal offenses for the circulation of cosmetics without permission are increasingly worrying. Cosmetic products are imported products that are not registered by BPOM, so that cosmetic products are illegal products. Like the criminal act of cosmetics circulation without permission contained in the decision 334 / Pid.Sus / 2015 / PN.Dps. The main problem in this thesis is how the criminal acts against the perpetrators of the crime of cosmetics circulation that do not have marketing authorization and do not have expertise in pharmaceutical practices according to Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. This study uses a type of normative juridical research that is analytically descriptive, using secondary data obtained by library studies and then analyzed qualitatively and uses deductive logic as a way of drawing conclusions. The results showed that the actions of the perpetrators charged in this case were Article 197 in conjunction with Article 106 paragraph (1) of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, but the judges should have applied Article 198 in conjunction with Article 98 paragraph (2) and (3) considering the perpetrators were not as a person who has the expertise to produce and distribute cosmetics. then the proven element is the element of article 198, namely everyone who does not have the expertise and authority to practice pharmacy as referred to in article 108.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI HAK IMUNITAS SEORANG ADVOKAT YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAKAN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI (CONTOH PUTUSAN NOMOR 90/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst) Sri Ayu Sukmawati Loi; Dian Adriawan DG Tawang
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8953

Abstract

Advocates have immunity rights that cannot be prosecuted either by civil law or crimes to uphold justice for their clients, therefore this research is to submit an application for advocate's immunity rights under Article 16 of the Advocate Law relating to work agreements and employment assistance for obstruction of legal protection. The research method used is normative legal research. The results of the analysis in this study are that the application of advocacy protection rights only applies to advocates who have legal relations with the people they help (clients) and facilitate their profession to support their clients in good faith to uphold in accordance with appropriate laws. Judicial practices Barring justice in corruption cases under Article 21 UUPTPK is another crime related to corruption but not corruption which is a general crime, which is related to conducting investigations and prosecutions is the police and prosecutors, not the KPK. It is unfair if the KPK becomes a victim of an objection to justice and at the same time acts as a law enforcer. Provisions Regarding Barriers to Regional Regulation Article 221 of the Criminal Code, Article 21 of Law Number 31 of 1999 Jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Eradication, Article 20 to Article 24 of Law Number 21 of 2007 TPPO and also regulated in Article 25 of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC).