Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.155
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Ninuk Wijiningsih
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
- PERAN OMBUDSMAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MELAKSANAKAN PENGAWASAN TERHADAP PERALIHAN STATUS ANGGOTA KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI MENJADI PEGAWAI APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA ATAU PEMERINTAH : - Abel Sheva Xavier Istiadi; Ninuk Wijiningsih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18375

Abstract

The Government of Indonesia seeks to establish a state institution that has authority to oversee delivery of public services. The Ombudsman is a public service institution formed at the initiation of Government through Presidential Decree No. 44 of 2000 concerning the National Ombudsman Commission to become forum for building public trust to create an honest, clean, open government and free from corruption, collusion and nepotism to create an effective and efficient government. The problem in this research relates to the transfer of status from KPK employees to ASN. It is suspected that there are maladministration activities in the process of transferring the status. Research method is normative juridical research with statutory approach that used qualitative descriptive analysis. The results of this study indicate that mechanism for issuing a recommendation letter is given to the Head of KPK and the Head of the State Civil Service Agency, the Ombudsman RI is in accordance with the procedures regulated by the rule of law, especially those listed in the Ombudsman RI Law. The Ombudsman basically cannot follow up on reports listed with Number 625 in 2021 which contains findings of maladministration from public services. Particularly on the fault of the public service
PERBANDINGAN SISTEM PARLEMEN BIKAMERAL DI INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA : Comparison Of The Bicameral Parliament System In Indonesia And The Philippines Ibnu Kuncoro; Ninuk Wijiningsih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19180

Abstract

The bicameral parliamentary is a system of division of chambers in parliaments. The chambers of Parliament are divided into two chambers, consisting of the upper house and the lower house. In Indonesian parliament, there are still differences of opinion among experts on the application of which chamber system. Some experts argue that Indonesia implements soft bicameralism, and some argue that Indonesia also applies tirkameral. Based on this, comparison of the bicameral systems in Indonesia and the Philippines was carried out. The problem of this research is: 1) Are the differences and similarities of the bikameral system in the legislative bodies of Indonesia and Filipina?, 2) Are the advantages and disadvantages of the bicameral scheme applied by Indonesia and the Philippines? This research is typical normative juris, which is descriptive, with primary sources of secondary data, which are analyzed qualitatively with the method of deductive inference. The result and conclusion of the study is that there is a fundamental similarity in the bicameral parliamentary system in Indonesia and the Philippines: all legislative bodies are elected by general election, as well as obtaining the common duties of the legislative body, and there are differences in the balance of powers between the chambers.
PERBANDINGAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA DAN BRASIL : Comparison of Presidential General Election Dispute Resolution in Indonesia and Brazil Billy Herlambang Rahmat Hidayat; Ninuk Wijiningsih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19193

Abstract

Elections there are violations which are called general election disputes. In Indonesia, the dispute resolution regarding the Presidential election is resolved by several related institutions. In Brazil, disputes related to violations in the Presidential election are resolved by an authorized institution, namely the Superior Electoral Tribunal. The problems in this study are: What are the similarities and differences between the mechanisms for resolving presidential election disputes in Indonesia and Brazil, and whether the mechanisms for resolving presidential election disputes in Indonesia and Brazil are in accordance with the laws and regulations. This research is normative research, using secondary data, descriptive in nature, analyzed qualitatively, and deductive inference. The results are similarities related to rules set forth in laws and regulations in each country, having authorized institution in the presidential election dispute, the involvement of the judiciary and the decision is final and binding. The differences are related to the authorized institution in resolving presidential election disputes, the time of the presidential election dispute resolution process, and in terms of the results of decisions related to the presidential election dispute resolution mechanism. The conclusion is, Indonesia and Brazil have similarities and differences in resolving presidential election conflicts.
- The Death Penalty in the Context of Human Rights (A Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 3083 K/PID.SUS/2022: Human Rights Perspective on the Death Penalty (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 3083 K/PID.SUS/2022) Novia Rahmawati nasution; Ninuk Wijiningsih
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i2.19949

Abstract

Every human being has Human Rights (HAM) as a creature of God whose existence and dignity must be supported and respected. When faced with human rights, the death penalty in Indonesia in narcotics crime cases always raises pros and cons. The formulation of the problem of this article is whether the imposition of the death penalty against narcotics offenders in Supreme Court Decision Number 3083 K/Pid.Sus/2022 is in accordance with human rights principles. The method used is normative juridical by analyzing laws and regulations in relation to applicable norms and data collection using the literature method. The result is that the judex facti's decision is not contrary to the law, so the defendant's cassation is rejected, because the actions of the perpetrator will greatly disturb the community and disturb the next generation if children and adolescents fall into the use of narcotics. The conclusion is shows that the death penalty for drug offenders in Supreme Court Decision Number 3083 K/Pid.Sus/2022 in Indonesia is contrary to the right to life stipulated in Article 6 of the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, but is in accordance with Indonesian positive law, namely Law No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics.
Co-Authors Abel Sheva Xavier Istiadi Alfian Kelen Amirul Huda Musyafa Samudra Amita Fayzia Handyani Billy Herlambang Rahmat Hidayat Dimas Adiansyah Dimas Adiyansyah Fauzan Raisal Misri Ibnu Kuncoro Novia Rahmawati nasution Rayshe Gabriela Rumbewas Sacharissa Kaulika Siti Nur Rizqiah Syafira Zahra Nurasila Tsalsa Fitriyani Zulkarnain