Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Forgery of Authentic Deeds by Notaries in The Case of The Judgment of The District Court of Sleman No. 196/PID. B/2018/PN.SMN Rizky Muthiarani; Siti Hajati Hosein
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 11 No. 4 (2022): October: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (235.983 KB)

Abstract

As a general officer, a Notary has the authority to make authentic deeds by adhering to the Notary's Rules of Office and Ethics. However, in practice, Notaries still abuse their power in doing original deeds, namely without following the obligations and limitations set in the laws and regulations and even forging letters. This can cause adverse legal consequences for related parties and Third Parties. If this happens, the Notary can be blamed and asked for compensation by parties who feel aggrieved and cause implications in the form of Notary responsibility. This research will focus on discussions related to the authority to make Notarial deeds and the responsibility of Notaries if they are proven to have committed criminal acts of forgery of authentic deeds. This research will also discuss the legal consequences imposed on Notaries by analyzing the Sleman District Court Decision Number 196 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN.Smn. The research method used is a juridical-normative approach, examining the principles and elements of the Notary Position and Ethics Regulations and the Criminal Code. The results of this study show that the validity of a deed made by a Notary without meeting formal requirements or material requirements is null and void and is considered to have never been born. A copy of the deed issued is an act of forgery of letters. The consequences for a Notary who is proven to have committed the show can be in the form of administrative sanctions and can be threatened with criminal sanctions based on the provisions of Article 264 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.
Tinjauan Terhadap Implementasi Perbantuan Pekerja di PT X Julianto; Siti Hajati Hosein
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/afrb3f39

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi perbantuan pekerja di PT X. Metode yang digunakan adalah dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan jenis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya kekosongan aturan yang menyebabkan tidak tercapainya sebuah kepastian hukum sebagai salah satu tujuan dari adanya hukum. Terlebih, hingga saat ini UU Ketenagakerjaan belum secara eksplisit mengatur tentang perbantuan pekerja. Pemerintah perlu memperkuat peraturan ketenagakerjaan terkait perbantuan pekerja, termasuk mengatur syarat-syarat perbantuan pekerja, perjanjian kerja perbantuan (secondment agreement), perlindungan hak-hak pekerja perbantuan, serta tata cara penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial pekerja perbantuan. Secondment agreement yang telah diimplementasikan oleh beberapa perusahaan salah satunya oleh PT X dapat menjadi dasar pengaturan terkait perbantuan pekerja saat ini. Di secondment agreement diatur bahwa selama pekerja diperbantukan di perusahaan lain, tidak akan terjadi peralihan hubungan kerja dari perusahaan asal (home company) kepada perusahaan pengguna/perusahaan penugasan (host company). Selain itu, diatur pula mengenai jangka waktu perbantuan dan jaminan pemenuhan hak-hak pekerja selama masa perbantuan yang dijamin minimal sama dengan hak-hak pekerja pada saat bekerja di perusahaan asal.