Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Pledoi Law Jurnal
Amiruddin Pabbu
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Kepemilikan Narkotika (Studi Kasus Kota Makassar) Andi Rahmah; Amiruddin Pabbu
Alauddin Law Development Journal (ALDEV) Vol 4 No 2 (2022): ALDEV
Publisher : Law Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/aldev.v4i2.28489

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the application of material criminal law in cases of narcotics possession crimes and to find out what the judges consider in making decisions against perpetrators of narcotics possession crimes. The research method used is normative legal research with a research approach that includes a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Technique Analysis of the data was analyzed qualitatively, then from the results of the analysis will be poured descriptively. The application of the Material Criminal Law by the Judge to the Crime of Possession of Narcotics Category I in the Decision on Case Number 669/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks has been correct. The Public Prosecutor used alternative charges, namely: Article 114 Paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics Jo Article 132 (1) of the Law. RI. No. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, or Article 112 Paragraph (1) of the Law. RI. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Among the elements of the two Articles charged by the Public Prosecutor. Where the actions and the elements of the Article match each other. The judge's legal consideration of the criminal act of Narcotics Ownership Category I is not a plant in imposing a sentence, it is appropriate because the Judge in case Number 669/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Mks imposed a sentence based on witness testimony, defendant's statement, and documentary evidence according to Article 184 KUHAP is legal evidence. Furthermore, the evidence supports the facts revealed in the trial which convinced the judge that the criminal act of Possession of Narcotics Category I was not a plant that actually occurred and that the defendant was guilty of committing it.
Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Menyimpan dan Memelihara Satwa yang Dilindungi Dalam keadaan hidup (Studi Putusan Nomor : 244/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN.Sgm) Amiruddin Pabbu; Arry Wirawan; Agus Sugeng Jatmiko
Pledoi Law Jurnal Vol. 2 No. 02 (2024): Pledoi Law Jurnal
Publisher : Pledoi Law Jurnal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The research findings indicate that the application of Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a in conjunction with Article 40 paragraph (2) of Law Number 5 of 1990 on the Conservation of Biological Natural Resources and Their Ecosystems is appropriate, as the judge considered that storing, possessing, and maintaining protected wildlife can disrupt the continuity of the ecosystem. According to the Minister of Environment and Forestry Regulation No. P.20/Menlhk/Setjen/KUM.1/6/2018, Perkici Dora and Blue-Eared Lory birds are protected species threatened by excessive capture and trade. The defendant's actions should be evaluated based on the quality of the act, which significantly impacts wildlife preservation and the environment. Therefore, the judge should have imposed a harsher penalty than the one in Decision No. 244/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN.Sgm.   ABSTRAK: Hasil Penelitian menujukkan bahwa Penerapan Pasal 21 ayat (2) huruf a Jo Pasal 40 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1990 tentang Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Hayati dan Ekosistemnya adalah sudah tepat karena hakim mempertimbangkan bahwa menyimpan, memiliki dan memelihara, satwa yang dilindungi dalam keadaan hidup dapat menyebabkan permasalahan terhadap keberlangsungan ekosistem satwa. Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan nomor P.20/Menlhk/Setjen/KUM.1/6/2018 bahwa burung Perkici Dora dan Nuri Telinga Biru merupakan satwa yang telah dilindungi dan terus terancam oleh penangkapan dan perdagangan berlebihan. Serta Perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh terdakawa tidaklah dipandang dengan perspektif kuantiti objek pidana melainkan harus dilihat dari kacamata kualitas perbuatan yang dapat memberikan dampak yang begitu besar bagi kelestarian satwa dan lingkungan hidup secara umum. Oleh karena itu, apa yang telah dituangkan Hakim sepatutnya dapat memberikan ganjaran yang lebih berat dari sanksi pidana yang telah ditetapkan pada Putusan Nomor 244/Pid.B/LH/2023/PN.Sgm.
Co-Authors Agus Sugeng Jatmiko Andi Rahmah Arry Wirawan