Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MUQTASID Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum
Wawan Gunawan Abdul Wahid, Wawan Gunawan Abdul
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Posisi Ushul Fikih dalam Metodologi Ekonomi Islam Wahid, Wawan Gunawan Abdul
Muqtasid: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah Vol 5, No 1 (2014): MUQTASID: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah
Publisher : IAIN Salatiga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18326/muqtasid.v5i1.1-21

Abstract

Islamic Economics is an entity of thought and practice that currently writhingin Muslim communities. Each entity has certain ideas of its own methodology.So it is with Islamic economics. Since the product of intentional since thebeginning of Islamic economics is different from the conventional economywas certainly one of the distinguishing framework called ushul fiqh. Thispaper presents the position of ushul fiqh methodology of Islamic economics.To confirm the significance of the position shown several such productswhere the Islamic economic jurisprudence fiqh perspective when used as awhole shows a different product than the product of conventional economics.
“MEMBACA” KEPEMIMPINAN PEREMPUAN DALAM RUU KESETARAAN DAN KEADILAN GENDER DENGAN PERSPEKTIF MUHAMMADIYAH Wahid, Wawan Gunawan Abdul
Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 11 No. 2 (2012)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2012.112.229-246

Abstract

The Draft Law on Gender Equality is present in the community through a variety of responses. Response to the RUU-KKG more colored by a misunderstanding. While poisitif response against based on the fact that the RUU-KKG largely do not conflict with religious teachings in Islam. Among the positive response was given by Muhammadiyah as described in this article. The focus of this article is to study RUU-KKG readings on various laws and Tajdid Muhammadiyah the Legal Affairs Committee. Muhammadiyah insights about women's leadership alignments on gender equality. Alignments were seen in the decision, as well as the fatwa discourse proposes that provides an opportunity for women to show up as a leader in various levels in the public space. In fact, of the time of its emergence, the study of the Legal Affairs Committee of the law of women in politics and became a judge can be regarded as a pioneer in its field.
PANDANGAN MAJLIS TARJIH DAN TAJDID MUHAMMADIYAH TENTANG NIKAH SIRRI DAN ITSBAT NIKAH: ANALISIS MAQASHID ASY-YARI’AH Wahid, Wawan Gunawan Abdul
Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 12 No. 2 (2013)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2013.122.215-236

Abstract

Among the issues on marriage hotly discussed are the types of marriages frequently  causing problems in society. One of these marriages are sirrimarriages, which are still often declared religiously valid by several parties. Observing the problem raised by sirrimarriages, among them dues to its lack of documentation, Muhammadiyah –through MajlisTarjihand Tajdid- views that all marriages must be registered. Meanwhile, Muhammadiyah also holds the view that marital itsbatis a facility  prepared by the state only for exceptional circumstances of sirrimarriages prior to the  enactment of Law No. 1 of 1974. The analysis on the views of Muhammadiyah will be conducted according to the theory of maqashidasy-syari’ah.
‘Illat, Hikmah, Qiyas: Studi Pemikiran Imam Ar-Razi dan Imam Al-Amidi tentang Penetapan Hukum dalam Istinbat Qiyasi Rahman, Muhammad Minanur; Wahid, Wawan Gunawan Abdul
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v11i1.3045

Abstract

The majority of scholars state that hikmah cannot be considered as an ‘illat (legal cause) due to its abstract and elusive nature. This article aims to examine the views of Imam ar-Razi and Imam al-Amidi regarding hikmah as an ‘illat in Islamic jurisprudence, identify their similarities and differences, and explore the implications for legal deduction. This research uses a literature review methodology with a comparative analysis of the works of Imam ar-Razi and Imam al-Amidi as the primary data sources. The article utilizes usul al-fiqh, a methodological approach to the study of legal issues based on the framework of ‘illat and the hikmah of the law in Islamic jurisprudence. The findings of this article indicate that Imam ar-Razi rejects the use of hikmah as an ‘illat, arguing that hikmah is uncertain and its nature is not constant for every law. On the other hand, Imam al-Amidi suggests that a law accompanied by a clear nature can contain hidden hikmah. The commonality in the thinking of both scholars lies in their rejection of ta’lilul ahkam bi al-hikmah. They argue that hikmah is difficult to ascertain and possesses an abstract nature. There are three key differences between these two scholars: in terms of methodology, thinking, and implications.[Sebagian besar ulama berpendapat bahwa hikmah tidak dapat menjadi ‘illat karena sifatnya yang abstrak dan sulit dipahami. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pemikiran Imam ar-Razi dan Imam al-Amidi mengenai hikmah sebagai ‘illat hukum, menemukan persamaan dan perbedaannya, serta implikasinya terhadap istinbat hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan dengan analisis komparatif berdasarkan karya Imam ar-Razi dan Imam al-Amidi sebagai sumber data utama. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam artikel ini adalah usul al-fiqh, yang merupakan pendekatan untuk memahami masalah hukum berdasarkan kerangka teori ‘illat dan hikmah hukum dalam usul fiqh. Penemuan dalam artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Imam ar-Razi menolak penggunaan hikmah sebagai ‘illat dengan alasan bahwa hikmah itu tidak dapat diketahui dengan pasti dan sifatnya tidak tetap untuk setiap hukum. Di sisi lain, Imam al-Amidi berpendapat bahwa hukum yang disertai dengan sifat yang jelas dapat mengandung hikmah yang tersembunyi. Persamaan dalam pemikiran kedua tokoh ini adalah penolakan terhadap ta’lilul ahkam bi al-hikmah. Mereka berpendapat bahwa hikmah sulit untuk ditemukan dan bersifat abstrak. Terdapat tiga perbedaan utama antara kedua tokoh tersebut: dalam metode, pemikiran, dan implikasi hukumnya.]
Co-Authors Rahman, Muhammad Minanur