Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.702
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AL-ULUM : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Jurnal Terapung : Ilmu - Ilmu Sosial Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI)
Nurul Listiyani
Universitas islam Kalimantan MAB
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
KAJIAN TERHADAP UU CIPTA KERJA KLUSTER LINGKUNGAN HIDUP ATAS DIHAPUSNYA PRINSIP STRICT LIABILITY Nurul Listiyani; Rakhmat Nopliardy
AL-ULUM : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 2 (2022): Edisi Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/alsh.v8i2.8274

Abstract

Indonesia adapted the concept of strict liability for the disposal of B3 (Hazardous and Toxic Materials) waste into the 1982 and 1997 Environmental Management Laws. However, only in the Environmental Management and Protection Act Number 32 of 2009 (UUPPLH), this principle more firmly listed. UUPPLH emphasizes that as long as there is an action that causes damage, the perpetrator must be responsible for restitution or compensation for damage to the victim without the need for supporting evidence. This principle has proven to be effective in instructing corporations to provide material compensation (ecosystem rehabilitation and compensation to victims) and immaterial (for example, counseling assistance to victims who have lost their livelihoods due to environmental damage). The enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation/Omnibus Law as a national legal development policy directed at the ideological role model of legal centralism (legal centralism resulted in a shift in policy in the agrarian and environmental sectors. The abolition of the strict liability principle in the Job Creation Law will increase opportunities corporations escape legal proceedings for environmental crimes they commit and add to the burden on victims. From the normative study, it can be seen that the principle of absolute responsibility is used in carrying out a person's activity which is categorized as ultrahazardous (very dangerous) so that person has an obligation to bear all losses that arise. The disappearance of the phrase "without the need to prove an element of guilt" in the Job Creation Act is one of the setbacks in environmental law enforcement. The Job Creation Act shifts the policy of criminal sanctions against environmental crimes with administrative sanctions that are prioritized as stated in Article 82B paragraph (2) letter aKeywords: Corporation, omnibus law, strict liability, law enforcement
KAJIAN TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEKERJA KONTRAK WAKTU TERTENTU (PKWT) DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA Nurul listiyani; Rakhmat Nopliardy; Ibelashri Justiceka
Jurnal Terapung : Ilmu - Ilmu Sosial Vol 4, No 2 (2022): September 2022
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/jt.v4i2.8230

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perubahan materi muatan yang mengatur tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu  serta konsep perlindungan terhadap PKWT pasca berlakunya UU Nomor 11 tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja yang ditinjau secara normatif. Melalui Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2021 tentang Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu, Alih Daya, Waktu Kerja, Hubungan Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat, dan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja (PP No. 35/2021) yang merupakan peraturan pelaksana dari UU Cipta Kerja, terdapat cukup banyak perubahan-perubahan yang signifikan, salah satunya yang berkaitan dengan ketentuan dan pelaksanaan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu (PKWT). Perjanjian kerja dikualifikasi dalam dua jenis yakni perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu (PKWT) dan perjanjian kerja waktu tidak tertentu (PKWTT).Perubahan ketentuan tersebut tidak dapat semata-mata dilihat sebagai suatu perubahan yang menguntungkan pihak tertentu saja, dalam hal ini pihak pengusaha atau pemberi kerja, dan pihak buruh atau pekerja. Melainkan harus dilihat dalam perspektif yang lebih luas, terutama dari segi kepastian hukum, yang menjadi salah satu indikator dari kemudahan berinvestasi, yang menjadi pendorong utama diterbitkannya UU Cipta Kerja serta peraturan turunannya tersebut. Melalui penelitian hukum normatif yang mengkaji materi muatan yang terdapat dalam UU Cipta Kerja beserta peraturan pelaksananya, maka hasil penelitian diproyeksikan menjadi masukan kepada pemerintah agar mampu meramu regulasi yang memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemberi kerja dan pekerja.  Kata Kunci : Pekerja Kontrak Waktu Tertentu; perubahan aturan; ketidakpastia;, perlindungan Kerja.
Kewajiban Perusahaan Pertambangan Dalam Reklamasi Lahan Tambang Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Diaz Rahadiyan Rizkirobbi; Nurul Listiyani; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i3.92

Abstract

Aside from the rise of environmental issues regarding mining activities, especially in the context of reclamation and post-mining activities, there have been changes in the regulations governing them. The reclamation program for ex-mining land is a mandatory program that must be carried out by every company, both private and non-private. Reclamation is an activity carried out throughout the mining business stages to organize, restore, and improve the quality of the environment and the ecosystem so that they function again according to their designation. The placement of post-mining guarantees by companies should not eliminate the company's obligation to carry out post-mining activities. If the company has a shortage of reclamation planning costs, placement of reclamation guarantees, implementation of reclamation, or release or disbursement of reclamation guarantees to complete post-mining activities under the stipulated guarantee, it remains the company's responsibility.  
Kewajiban Perusahaan Pertambangan Dalam Reklamasi Lahan Tambang Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Diaz Rahadiyan Rizkirobbi; Nurul Listiyani; Iwan Riswandie
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober 2022
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v3i3.92

Abstract

Aside from the rise of environmental issues regarding mining activities, especially in the context of reclamation and post-mining activities, there have been changes in the regulations governing them. The reclamation program for ex-mining land is a mandatory program that must be carried out by every company, both private and non-private. Reclamation is an activity carried out throughout the mining business stages to organize, restore, and improve the quality of the environment and the ecosystem so that they function again according to their designation. The placement of post-mining guarantees by companies should not eliminate the company's obligation to carry out post-mining activities. If the company has a shortage of reclamation planning costs, placement of reclamation guarantees, implementation of reclamation, or release or disbursement of reclamation guarantees to complete post-mining activities under the stipulated guarantee, it remains the company's responsibility.  
Co-Authors Diaz Rahadiyan Rizkirobbi Ibelashri Justiceka Rakhmat Nopliardy Riswandie, Iwan