Ahmad Anfasul Marom, Ahmad Anfasul
UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

SYARI'AH MOVEMENTS IN COMPARASION: SOUTH SULAWESI AND WEST JAVA PROVINCE Marom, Ahmad Anfasul
Al Qalam Vol 28 No 1 (2011): January - April 2011
Publisher : Center for Research and Community Service of UIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin Banten-Serang City-Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2070.091 KB) | DOI: 10.32678/alqalam.v28i1.507

Abstract

This paper will examine the rise of perda syari'ah (syari'ah regional regulations) in contemporary Indonesia. Since the fall of Soeharto, the muslim politics has reemerged in the national politics constellation. From 1999 to 2002 three Islamic political parties (PPP, PBB, and PK) insisted on proposing to reinsert the seven words of the Jakarta Charter into the amendment of 1945 Constitution. They intensively strived for them through the inside of parliament. In the same time, their efforts were also fully supported by the Islamic radicalism organization from the outside building such as HTI (Liberation Party) and MMI (Council of Indonesian Jihad Fighters). lf they previously insisted to implement syari'ah in state level, now they attempted to have it from a local region. This can be witnessed from the application of syari'ah regional regulation (perda syari'ah) in some Muslim-majority districts such as Bulukumba, Gowa, Maros, Lombok, Pamekasan, Cianjur, Indramayu, Tasikmalaya, Padang, Banjarmasin, and Nanggro Aceh Darussalam. This study tries to compare two Muslim majority provinces (South Sulawesi and West Java) which have applied perda syari'ah since 2001.
The Comparative Dialectic of Islam, Politics, and Government in Indonesia and Thailand Marom, Ahmad Anfasul; Kusuma, Bayu Mitra Adhyatma
Islamic Insights Journal Vol 1, No 2 (2019): Islamic Insights Journal
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pesantren dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat, LPPM, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.iij.2019.001.02.3

Abstract

The religion particularly Islam has a considerable influence on the politics and governmental system in a country generally. But of course the role of Islam in politics and government will be different when Islam as the majority religion compared when Islam became a minority religion. It becomes interesting to be explored further, so as to see concrete evidence the authors determined to compare the dialectic of Islam in the politics and government in Indonesia and Thailand. The results of research showed that there is a significant imbalance between the role of Islam in Indonesia and Thailand for politics and government. In Indonesia since the struggle until independence era, the Muslim leaders and activists are aware that in order to improve the condition of the country, it takes a political struggle to deal with attempts to obtain power to influence government and public policy making. This can be evidenced by the existence of Islamic party or Islamic mass-based party from the first general election to date. In addition, at the level of government the role of Muslim activists and scholars are also greatly affected. Instead, in Thailand show that Islam has a small portion in politics and government. This is evidenced by the lack of political access and opportunity to participate in the governmental system. Even in a particular regime, Muslims get very discriminatory treatment. Like as in the administration of Prime Minister Phibul Songkhram and Thaksin Shinawatra. This condition is supported by the prevailing political system in Thailand, where the authority of the regime is absolute and inviolable. As an impact, insurgents groups in Southern Thailand namely National Revolution Row (BRN) and Pattani United Liberation Organization (PULO) continued to express special autonomy. With the special autonomy it is expected that the conflict in Southern Thailand will subside.
The Rise of Syari'a Movements In Contemporary Indonesia Marom, Ahmad Anfasul
Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Vol 5 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (2575.347 KB) | DOI: 10.24090/mnh.v5i2.610

Abstract

Sejak dikeluarkannya UU OTODA (Otonomi Daerah) no. 22/1999 yang kemudian direvisi dengan UU no. 32/2004, kurang lebih ada 52 Pemda (Pemerintah Daerah) yang secara formal menerapkan Perda (Peraturan Daerah) bernuansa Syari’ah. Manifestasi Perda-perda ini sangat beragam mulai dari kewajiban mengenakan jilbab, wajib bisa baca al-Qur’an bagi PNS (Pegawai Negeri Sipil) yang ingin naik pangkat dan pelajar yang akan tes masuk sekolah lanjutan, serta formalisasi perda zakat ala Pemda. Padahal, menurut UU OTODA urusan agama sama sekali bukan urusan Pemda. Pemerintah Pusat tampaknya tak peduli kalau tidak dikatakan ‘powerless’ atas fenomena formalisasi keagamaan ini. Secara teoritis, menjamurnya Perda Syari’ah ini bisa dianulir dengan mudah oleh Kementerian Dalam Negeri karena bertentangan dengan hirarki UU yang lebih tinggi (UU no.32/2004). Paper ini menganalisa situasi kontemporer, tantangan baru bagi proses demokrasi, dan memprediksi masa depan potret masyarakat Muslim Indonesia. Ada dua isu utama yang akan dibahas di sini: a) argumentasi baik yang pro maupun kontra atas penerapan Perda Syariah ini. b) tantangan baru bagi proses demokratisasi di Indonesia di mana mayoritas penduduk Muslim terbesar di Dunia. Sebagian berpendapat penerapan Perda Syari’a bisa saja menjadi ‘bom waktu’ yang dapat mengancam demokratisasi dan keanekaragaman masyarakat Indonesia. Selanjutnya, saya akan menganalisa asumsi ini dengan mengadaptasi temuan riset PPIM (Pusat Pengkajian Islam dan Masyarakat) dan LSI (Lembaga Survei Indonesia) terkait dengan respon publik terhadap isu pluralisme, toleransi, dan Perda Syari’ah.
POLITIK HUKUM PIDANA Rekam Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Hukum Pembuktian Pidana Marom, Ahmad Anfasul; Buamona, Hasrul
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (412.346 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v3i1.1385

Abstract

Medical Currently, the relationship between doctor and patient is not just the relationship treatment alone, but he is also part of "therapeutic agreement" in which the patient is required to know and understand their rights and obligations in any effort to cure. One of the rights of patients in the treatment process is to get a record of treatment from a doctor or hospital, which in the world of health known as the Medical Record. But unfortunately, not many people who understand what it is and the importance of medical records for patients. Though medical record is valuable and important function for the patient, because it contains a description of a patient's medical history as well as actions taken by doctors in an effort to cure. In fact, not only that, the medical records could also be evidence in cases of alleged medical errors doctor sin handling/treating patients. This paper is going to study the problem of medical record as evidence in the criminal laws of evidence, especially in cases of alleged misconduct medical doctor.