Elvira Puspa Anggraeni
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PERAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN NOTARIS DALAM MEMERIKSA KASUS PENYALAHGUNAAN JABATAN SEBAGAI NOTARIS M. Akbar Maulana Rahman; Elvira Puspa Anggraeni; Elisabeth Adisty Novena
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i3.114

Abstract

Writing this article will discuss the role of the notary honorary council in examining cases of abuse of notary office. In this article, we will discuss what a notary is, what are his authorities and powers as a notary in accordance with his profession. This problem is motivated by the many cases of notary errors in carrying out their profession. For example, the number of dual land deeds that should be the role of a notary in making the deed. As a notary cohort, it is necessary to investigate several existing cases, especially those concerning notaries. In this investigation, it will be divided into several parts. Which parts will later become the authority of the notary honorary assembly. This is also related to the code of ethics as a notary. In carrying out a position, of course someone is required or required to apply in accordance with the existing code of ethics. If someone who holds a position then commits a violation or acts outside the code of ethics, it can be classified as a criminal act of violating the code of ethics. One of the codes of ethics that is highly respected in the notary profession is to behave honestly, independently and not take sides with anyone. This is then upheld in the notary profession. This study uses normative legal methods. The normative method is legal research consisting of research on legal principles, legal systematics, and legal comparisons. The sources for writing this article are from journals and articles or other reading materials as research sources. These sources are then analyzed and presented in written form to produce a scientific work that is expected to be well understood. In addition, this article is expected to be an input or source of reading for other law students
NOODWEER DAN NOODWEER EXCES TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN Elvira Puspa Anggraeni; Ahmad Mahyani
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i1.140

Abstract

As a state of law, Indonesia is obliged to implement everything based on the applicable rules. No exception related to criminal acts, mistakes and also liability in accordance with applicable law. The material truth that is the value of a trial process will correlate with a person's criminal responsibility. One of them is in the case with Decision Number: 867/Pid.B/2021/PN.Jkt.Sel on behalf of the Defendant Fikri Ramadhan, who committed the murder of four FPI members in order to carry out his duties as members of the police. In order to look further into this case, the researcher formulates the problem formulation, namely how are the qualifications of noodweer and noodweer exces in criminal liability related to the crime of murder. This study uses normative legal research to find solutions to legal problems in this study. The conceptual approach and the legal approach are used by researchers as an approach method in this study. The results of this study found that Noodweer and Noodweer exces have been regulated in Article 49 of the Criminal Code. Noodweer and noodweer exces have similarities in the sense of carrying out a self-defense because of an attack that is against the law, against the body, wealth and honor of morality to either yourself or others. While between the two there is a difference, in this case the noodweer exces case there is a great mental shock experienced by the perpetrator. In the case of criminal acts in the a quo case, the murder committed by the defendant falls into the category of self-defense and self-defense that goes beyond the limits. This is because at the time of the incident the defendant experienced a very large psychological shock due to the threat of strangulation and the pointing of a firearm made by the perpetrator against the defendant and his partner, in their self-defense efforts