Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Implikasi Hukum Pemasangan CCTV di Tempat Umum secara Tersembunyi terhadap Perlindungan Data Pribadi Nadia Carolina Weley; Hari Sutra Disemadi
Amnesti Jurnal Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37729/amnesti.v4i2.2151

Abstract

Alat pemroses atau pengolah data visual merupakan salah satu bentuk kemajuan teknologi yang menjadi bagian dari masyarakat Indonesia, kehadiran APDV salah satunya CCTV menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia telah berpartisipasi dan ikut andil dalam kehadiran instalasi yang akan menjadi bagian dari masa depan. Kehadiran CCTV menimbulkan dampak positif dan negatif bagi pengguna berikut individu yang hanya sekadar menghampiri area yang dilengkapi dengan alat tersebut, sehingga menimbulkan beberapa kecanggungan dalam hal perlindungan data pribadi, yang menyangkut kewarganegaraan, nama lengkap, informasi genetik dan informasi yang bersifat khusus dan diatur oleh UU. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian doctrinal diikuti pendekatan secara kualitatif yang memanfaatkan bahan-bahan tertulis seperti UU, dokumen-dokumen dan bahan tertulis lainnya. Pengaturan mengenai pemasangan APDV di tempat tersembunyi belum secara resmi diatur di dalam UU yang telah diterbitkan, melainkan diatur pada RUU PDP yang sedang menjadi pertimbangan perangkat pemerintahan, pengaturannya tersendiri diatur pada pasal 22 yang terdiri atas 3 ayat, pasal 52, dan 53, serta Pasal 62, dan pasal 63 yang mengatur mengenai sanksi dari pelanggar yang melanggar terkait pemasangan APDV secara tersembunyi. Maka dari itu, pengesahan RUU PDP sangat dibutuhkan dalam menghadapi pemasangan APDV secara tersembunyi ini, untuk menciptakan lingkungan hukum yang aman dan perlindungan yang cukup bagi masyarakat Indonesia.
Gamified Investment Apps and the Principle of Neutrality: A Comparative Legal Analysis of In-App Rewards and Badges in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines Lu Sudirman; Nadia Carolina Weley; Michael T. Sacramed; Antony Antony; David Tan
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.15223

Abstract

This study aims to examine whether in-app rewards and badges in investment applications constitute inducements or remain neutral engagement features, while assessing the adequacy of the legal frameworks in Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines in addressing this issue. The research employs a doctrinal legal method with a comparative approach, analyzing statutes, regulations, and legal principles related to investment law, consumer protection, and financial services regulation in the three jurisdictions. The study also draws on relevant literature concerning gamification, investor behavior, and digital financial services to identify the normative position of app-based rewards and badges within the broader legal context. The findings show that in-app rewards and badges are not inherently neutral because they are designed to increase engagement, usage frequency, and trading activity among users. Although these features are not necessarily unlawful, they may function as subtle behavioral inducements that influence investor decision-making, particularly among novice retail investors. The comparative analysis reveals that the Indonesian legal framework contains limited and indirect provisions that may apply to such features, but it lacks a specific principle of neutrality for investment app design. Malaysia provides relatively broader consumer and capital market protections, yet still does not expressly regulate gamified inducements in investment apps. The Philippine framework similarly focuses on misleading statements and disclosure obligations, leaving a gap in addressing psychological manipulation through gamification. Overall, the study finds that the current legal frameworks in all three countries are not fully equipped to regulate the subtle but potentially harmful effects of gamification in investment applications. Therefore, the study recommends the incorporation of a limited neutrality principle for investment app providers, especially regarding features that may operate as inducements rather than genuine engagement tools.
Regulatory Gaps in Data Protection and Proportionality in Digital Banking: Legal Issues in ASEAN Agustianto Agustianto; Michael T. Sacramed; Winda Fitri; Nadia Carolina Weley; Hari Sutra Disemadi
Syura: Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) Darul Ulum Banyuanyar Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58223/syura.v4i1.811

Abstract

This study examines the legal gaps in regulating data proportionality in ASEAN digital banking, particularly in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia. The main legal issue lies in the absence of clear standards governing the limitation, justification, and classification of personal data, which leads to excessive and potentially invasive data processing practices in digital banking systems. This research aims to examine the concept of data proportionality in digital banking and to assess the adequacy of legal frameworks governing data proportionality in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Malaysia in order to identify existing regulatory gaps. This study employs a normative legal research method with a comparative approach. The findings reveal that although all three countries have established data protection frameworks, none comprehensively integrate data proportionality into digital banking regulations, resulting in fragmented and ineffective legal protection. Indonesia lacks detailed standards and risk-based mechanisms, while the Philippines and Malaysia show regulatory gaps in governing conventional digital banking services. These weaknesses contribute to increased risks of privacy violations and legal uncertainty. Therefore, this study suggests the need for regulatory reform, including clearer data classification, proportionality standards, and mandatory risk assessments, to ensure a balance between digital banking innovation and the protection of consumer privacy rights.
Pojok Literasi Sebagai Titik Awal Mimpi Anak Negeri: Bakti Sosial dan Edukasi Pada Panti Asuhan Betesda di Kota Batam Rida Ainun M; Andri Hadi Wijaya; Fransisca Theresia; Euclid Macario; Aurora Najemi; Sausan Rafa Basyasyah; Jeffry Ng; Adam Morgan8; Nadia Carolina Weley; Ampuan Situmeang; Nayla Naysilla; Selvira Enjelita; Ellysia Augris; Helen Junika; Seliza Vilyone; Amelia; Liza Amalia; Dio Fabrizio
National Conference for Community Service Project (NaCosPro) Vol. 7 No. 01 (2025): The 7th National Conference for Community Service Project 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/nacospro.v7i01.11147

Abstract

Bakti sosial merupakan bentuk dari tanggung jawab sosial masyarakat Indonesia, khususnya dalam mendukung dan melindungi kelompok rentan seperti anak-anak. Panti asuhan berperan sebagai tempat perlindungan bagi anak-anak yang kurang beruntung secara sosial dan ekonomi. Salah satu bentuk nyata dari perwujudan tanggung jawab tersebut dilaksanakan oleh mahasiswa Kelompok Ajaib 3 dari Universitas Internasional Batam melalui kegiatan bakti sosial dan pendirian pojok literasi di Panti Asuhan Betesda, Batam. Kegiatan ini menggunakan metode edukatif dan partisipatif yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan minat membaca, rasa percaya diri, kemampuan berpikir kritis dan berkomunikasi anak-anak di panti asuhan. Kegiatan bakti sosial ini menjadi pengalaman berharga bagi mahasiswa kelompok ajaib 3 dalam memahami pentingnya empati dan pengabdian masyarakat. Sebelum kegiatan bakti sosial, panti asuhan batesda belum memiliki pojok literasi, namun setelah kegiatan yang dilaksanakan oleh ajaib 3, pojok literasi berhasil dibangun.
Upaya Hukum yang Dapat Diambil Konsumen Terkait Keterlambatan dalam Proses Pengiriman Produk Indra Indra; Agustianto Agustianto; Nadia Carolina Weley
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Februari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5815

Abstract

Delays in delivery of goods in e-commerce transactions in Indonesia cause material and immaterial losses for consumers. This situation places customers at a disadvantage and requires a firm regulatory framework to enforce their rights. The objective of this study is to analyze the regulatory arrangements that control delivery delays, the obligations of businesses and delivery services, and the mechanisms for customers facing default. The method applied is a doctrinal juridical study through regulatory methodology and an empirical study in the form of a survey and literature review related to e-commerce practices, customer protection, and default. The study findings indicate that legal regulations regarding delivery delays are quite comprehensive, reflected in Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019, and delivery service regulations. However, practice in the field shows a gap between legal norms and reality, with more than 35% of consumers experiencing delays at least once a year due to internal business factors or logistical constraints. Consumers can pursue non-litigation legal remedies through complaints, grievances, or BPSK (the Consumer Protection and Security Agency), as well as litigation in the form of breach of contract lawsuits and demands for material and immaterial compensation. This study concludes that the success of legal customer protection depends heavily on regulatory implementation, coordination between businesses and delivery services, and consumers' understanding of their rights.