Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

A Systematic Review of the IoT in Smart University: Model and Contribution Senny Luckyardi; Ratih Hurriyati; D. Disman; Puspo Dewi Dirgantari
Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology Vol 7, No 3 (2022): IJOST: VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/ijost.v7i3.51476

Abstract

The objectives of the review were to identify different implementation aspects of the Internet of Things (IoT) in Smart Universities (SU) from diverse studies, amplify the theories behind the IoT utilization and model in SU; as well as offer recommendations for future research in this area. This study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) technique, conducting comprehensive searches of the most relevant articles to the research question published from 2018 to 2022. Following a review of peer-reviewed journals, a total of 69 refereed articles were chosen and analyzed. The findings of this study suggest that the technology model needs to be aligned and integrated with organizational processes. IoT utilization should meet the adoption readiness of a university. The results also revealed that the creation of SU can be divided into three categories: behavior, learning, educational technology, and physical facilities. However, the literature related to IoT utilization and model is still incoherent and lacking in theoretical frameworks that reflect on specific circumstances such as SU. SU research is still in its early stages, with more work to be done in terms of identifying technology model adoption. The review also contributed to serving as inspiration and a point of reference for institutions as they work with the smart university initiative to create a teaching and learning environment that is more effective and efficient.
Teacher competency: Descriptive study of Guru Penggerak Kinanti Geminastiti Hilmiatussadiah; Eeng Ahman; D. Disman
Inovasi Kurikulum Vol 21, No 1 (2024): Inovasi Kurikulum, February 2024
Publisher : Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17509/jik.v21i1.63482

Abstract

Teachers must have competence in teaching. There are four competencies that teachers must have, namely pedagogical competence, professional competence, personality competence, and social competence. The Guru Penggerak program is hoped to increase competence in learning activities. This research aims to determine whether there are differences in the competencies of driving and non-moving teachers and describe the indicators of each competency. Based on a questionnaire distributed to students in classes X and XI, the greater pedagogical competence of driving teachers and no-moving teachers is found in the indicator that economics teachers speak politely and politely when delivering learning material, there is an ability to adapt to the surrounding environment, which is the highest average in social competences. The research instrument was given to students taught by Guru Penggerak and non-moving teachers. The results of the research show that for each competency indicator, there are indicators that have the same average value of driving teachers and non-moving teachers, but there are differences in professional, pedagogical, and personality competence between driving teachers and non-moving teachers, while social competence is the same between driving teachers and non-moving teachers. AbstrakGuru harus memiliki kompetensi dalam mengajar, terdapat empat kompetensi yang harus dimiliki oleh guru yaitu kompetensi pedagogik, kompetensi profesional, kompetensi kepribadian dan kompetensi sosial. Adanya program Guru Penggerak diharapkan dapat meningkatkan kompetensi pada kegiatan pembelajaran. Tujuan dilakukan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan kompetensi yang dimiliki Guru Penggerak dan bukan Guru Penggerak dan mendeskripsikan indikator dari setiap kompetensi. Instrumen penelitian diberikan kepada siswa yang diajar oleh Guru Penggerak dan bukan Guru Penggerak. Berdasarkan angket yang disebar kepada siswa kelas X dan XI sejumlah 23 pertanyaan tentang kompetensi guru, hasil penelitian menunjukkan kompetensi guru berada pada kategori tinggi, kompetensi profesional yang dimiliki Guru Penggerak dan bukan Guru Penggerak memiliki nilai rata-rata tertinggi pada penguasaan materi nilai rata-rata Kompetensi pedagogik Guru penggerak dan bukan Guru Penggerak yang lebih besar terdapat pada indikator Guru ekonomi berbicara santun dan sopan pada saat menyampaikan materi pembelajaran, terdapat kemampuan beradaptasi dengan lingkungan sekitar merupakan rata-rata tertinggi pada kompetensi sosial. Tetapi terdapat perbedaan kompetensi profesional, pedagogik dan kepribadian antara Guru Penggerak dan bukan Guru Penggerak sedangkan untuk kompetensi sosial sama antara Guru Penggerak dan bukan Guru Penggerak.Kata Kunci: Guru; guru penggerak; kompetensi guru