Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.39
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal CALYPTRA : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law)
Valentino Nathanael Prabowo
Unknown Affiliation
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Constructing Responsible Artificial Intelligence Principles as Norms: Efforts to Strengthen Democratic Norms in Indonesia and European Union Rofi Aulia Rahman; Valentino Nathanael Prabowo; Aimee Joy David; József Hajdú
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 9, No 2 (2022): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence influences democratic norms and principles. It affects the quality of democracy since it triggers hoaxes, irresponsible political campaign, and data privacy violations. The study discusses the legal framework and debate in the regulation of Artificial Intelligence in the European Union legal system. The study is a doctrinal legal study with conceptual and comparative approach. It aims to criticize the current doctrine of democracy.  The analysis explored the law on election and political party in Indonesia to argue that the democratic concept is outdated.  On the other hand, the European Union has prepared future legal framework to harmonize Artificial Intelligence and democracy. The result of the study indicates that the absence of law on Artificial Intelligence might be the fundamental reason of the setback of democracy in Indonesia. Therefore, the Indonesian legal system must regulate a prospective Artificial Intelligence regulation and a new democratic concept by determining the new principles of responsible Artificial Intelligence into drafts of laws on Artificial Intelligence, election, and political party. Finally, the new laws shall control programmers, politicians, governments, and voters who create and use Artificial Intelligence technology. In addition, these legal principles shall be the guideline to prevent the harms and to mitigate the risks of Artificial Intelligence technology as well as the effort to strengthen democracy.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v9n2.a5
INDEPENDENSI KEJAKSAAN AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA Valentino Nathanael Prabowo; Tjondro Tirtamulia; Hesti Armiwulan
CALYPTRA Vol. 12 No. 2 (2024): Calyptra : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya (Mei)
Publisher : Perpustakaan Universitas Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract—This study aims to analyze the independence of the Attorney General's Office in the constitutional system in Indonesia. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, historical, and comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia does not have institutional independence in the state administration system in Indonesia. This is because the Prosecutor's Office is a government institution or in other words it is under executive power. In addition, the provisions of Article 19 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia also state that the Attorney General is appointed and dismissed by the President. In this case the President has absolute power over the position of Attorney General. If the performance of the Attorney General is contrary to the interests of the President, then the President can dismiss him unilaterally. To address the issue of the independence of the Attorney General's Office, the Attorney General's Office must be positioned as an independent state institution (state auxiliary organ) so that the Attorney General's Office can be free from intervention by any party. Keywords: attorney general's office, independence, power restrictions Abstrak—Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis independensi Kejaksaan Agung dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang- undangan, konseptual, historis, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa Kejaksaan Agung Republik Indonesia tidak memiliki independensi secara institusional dalam sistem ketatanegaraan di Indonesia. Hal ini dikarenakan Lembaga Kejaksaan merupakan lembaga pemerintahan atau dengan kata lain berada di bawah kekuasaan eksekutif. Selain itu, ketentuan Pasal 19 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia juga menyatakan bahwa Jaksa Agung diangkat dan diberhentikan oleh Presiden. Dalam hal ini Presiden memiliki kekuasaan yang absolut terhadap kedudukan Jaksa Agung. Apabila kinerja Jaksa Agung berlawanan dengan kepentingan Presiden, maka Presiden dapat memberhentikannya secara sepihak. Untuk mengatasi persoalan independensi Kejaksaan Agung, maka Kejaksaan Agung haruslah diletakkan sebagai lembaga negara independen (state auxiliary organ) sehingga Kejaksaan Agung dapat terbebas dari intervensi pihak manapun. Kata kunci: Kejaksaan Agung, Independensi, Pembatasan Kekuasaan
Co-Authors Aimee Joy David Hesti Armiwulan József Hajdú Rahman, Rofi Aulia Tjondro Tirtamulia