Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Penelitian Medan Agama JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal Journal Equity of Law and Governance Case Law SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Journal of Innovative and Creativity PESHUM
Mhd. Yadi Harahap
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implementation of Bribes (Risywah) Based on Law No. 20 of 2001 on Action Criminal Corruption in Legal Perspective Islam in Medan State Court Ahmad Fadhly Roza; Mhd . Yadi Harahap; Ramadan Syahmedi Siregar
Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences (BIoHS) Journal Vol 2 No 3 (2020): Britain International of Humanities and Social Sciences, October
Publisher : Britain International for Academic Research (BIAR) Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33258/biohs.v2i3.324

Abstract

In accordance with the characteristics of empirical legal research using secondary data and the approach to this research is taken from legislation and revelation. Then the instrument used in this study is the cluster technique or called area sampling and interviews. The results showed; First, that there are too many statutory arrangements relating to bribery from time to time, there is no significant change from the description of the articles, it's just that the threat of punishment is getting heavier, and even overlaps with each other. Second, that the Medan District Court basically in adjudicating and deciding cases of bribery in corruption cases have used the prevailing laws and regulations, namely Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime as amended by Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law no. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime, however in applying the articles against the defendant still using a subjective interpretation. Third, that the responsibility for a criminal act only refers to prohibition and threatening of an act with a crime, whether the person who commits the act is then sentenced to punishment, this depends on whether in doing this act he has an error ( Geen straf zonder schuld; Actus non facit reum nisi mens sist rea ). This principle is not stated in written law but in unwritten law which also applies in Indonesia. The fiscal criminal law does not use mistakes. In fiscal punishment, if a person has violated the provisions, then he will be given a fine and confiscation. Corruption Crime Court. Whereas criminal responsibility for corruption perpetrators in the perspective of Islamic law is a lot of expert opinions, some are proposing cutting off hands, ta'zir , imprisonment and even the death penalty due to criminal acts of corruption which relies on syariqoh, ghulul , risywah and so on.
Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan Dalam Perkara Pembiayaan Murabahah Melalui Pengadilan Agama Medan Muhammad Fitri Adi; Budi Sastra Panjaitan; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 10, No 02 (2022): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/am.v10i02.3150

Abstract

Penelitian ini berangkat dari dualisme kewenangan penyelesaian sengketa perbankan syariah, yaitu Pengadilan Agama berdasarkan UU No.3 tahun 2006 dan Pengadilan Umum berdasarkan UU No. 21 tahun 2008. Penelitian ini mengkaji penyelesaian perkara sengketa ekonomi syariah yang diajukan ke Pengadilan Agama, khususnya pada akad murabahah yang nasabahnya ingkar janji (wanprestasi) yang tidak sampai pada pelaksanaan eksekusi hak tanggungannya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian lapangan. sumber data Primer adalah Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Agama Medan Nomor 27/Pdt.G/2021/PTA. Mdn jo. Putusan Nomor 1516/Pdt. G/2020/PA.Mdn. Hasil Penelitian menunjukan bahwa kewenangan mutlak Pengadilan Agama dalam meyelesaikan perkara ekonomi syariah sampai dengan pelaksanaan eksekusinya pasca dikeluarkannya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012 tanggal 29 agustus 2013 dan kendala yang dihadapi Pengadilan Agama Medan bersumber dari internal hukum dan lembaga Pengadilan Agama dan bersumber dari eksternal perilaku dan tindakan dari pihak masyarakat pencari keadilan dan pihak aparatur terkait.
COMPENSATION LIABILITY FOR CONSUMERS OF BEAUTY PRODUCTS THAT DISTRIBUTION LICENSES HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN BY BPOM PERSPECTIVE COMPILATION OF SHARIA ECONOMIC LAW Siti Nazar; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
istinbath Vol. 22 No. 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ijhi.v22i1.588

Abstract

Cosmetics are defined as particular components designed to be applied to the surface of the human body. Cosmetics are beauty products women use to beautify or change their appearance. It is usually used to beautify the outside of the human body to get an attractive appearance. Even though they are not a basic need, cosmetics are one of the many products used daily and routinely, especially by women. This study aims to find out the form of accountability for compensation related to beauty products whose distribution permits have been withdrawn but whose products are still found circulating in the community and how that will be done according to the views of the Sharia Economic Law Compilation (KHES) and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This study uses a juridical-normative research method in which legal and statutory theory is the approach. The theory used in this study is the theory of legal protection, namely providing protection for human rights that are harmed by other people. The results of this study explain that legal protection and liability for compensation to consumers, especially for beauty products whose distribution permits have been withdrawn by BPOM, are regulated in KHES and in UUPK Article 4 letter a, which explains the rights of consumers to obtain safety, security and comfort when using goods/services. And business actors are responsible if consumers suffer losses in the future for refunds and provide compensation according to the provisions of Article 19 paragraph (2) for consumers who are harmed to receive compensation for their health.
Ketika Notaris Menentukan Waris: Analisis Yuridis atas Kewenangan Notaris dalam Menyusun Surat Ahli Waris dan Akta Pembagian Warisan Bismar Siregar; Mhd. Yadi Harahap; Fauziah Lubis
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dasar hukum dan batas kewenangan notaris dalam penyusunan Surat Keterangan Ahli Waris (SKAW) dan Akta Pembagian Warisan (APW) dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang plural. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual melalui kajian terhadap Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peraturan Menteri Agraria Nomor 3 Tahun 1997. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa notaris secara yuridis memiliki kewenangan penuh untuk membuat akta autentik terkait pewarisan berdasarkan Pasal 15 ayat (1) UU No. 2 Tahun 2014 dan Pasal 1868 KUHPerdata. Namun, kewenangan tersebut dibatasi oleh fragmentasi administratif dalam Pasal 111 Permen Agraria Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 yang menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan diskriminasi terhadap golongan tertentu. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya rekonstruksi sistem pewarisan nasional untuk mengembalikan peran notaris sebagai simpul utama pembuktian waris lintas sistem hukum, guna menjamin kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan perlindungan hak milik sesuai dengan prinsip konstitusi, hukum hak asasi manusia, dan maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah.
Implementation of Fiduciary Guarantee Execution for Defaulting Debtors After the Decision of The Constitutional Court Number: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019 Regina Wydya Prameswari; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 6 No. 1
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/elg.6.1.10764.150-155

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the enforcement of fiduciary promises against defaulting debtors following the Constitutional Court ruling Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. The regulations pertaining to the registration of fiduciary guarantees, which was previously regarded as a necessary prerequisite for the guarantee's validity, were changed by this ruling. Using a library research approach, this study examines numerous legal sources, rules, and relevant literature to comprehend the legal modifications brought about by the decision. The study's primary focus is on the legal ramifications for creditors' and debtors' rights, as well as how the Constitutional Court's decision impacts the process of executing fiduciary assurances against defaulting debtors. The findings indicate that, while the verdict allows for greater flexibility in fiduciary registration, execution confronts procedural and creditor protection issues. In order to provide equitable legal protection for both parties, this study makes suggestions for enhancing the fiduciary guarantee implementation mechanism after the verdict.
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 62/PUU-XXII/2024 Tentang Penghapusan Presidential Threshold Perspektif Siyasah Qadhaiyyah Munawir Harahap; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 7 (2025): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Juli 2025
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v4i7.4221

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024, which annulled the presidential threshold provision in Article 222 of the Election Law, represents a significant legal event in Indonesian constitutional law. This study aims to analyze the Court's legal reasoning and its alignment with the principles of Islamic justice through the lens of Siyasah Qadhaiyyah. Employing a normative legal method with a statutory approach, case law approach, and comparative approach, the study draws upon primary legal sources and literature on fiqh siyasah. The analytical approach applied in this study is descriptive-qualitative, emphasizing a comprehensive understanding of the content and context of the data. The findings reveal that the Court deemed the threshold unconstitutional and in conflict with the principle of popular sovereignty. From the perspective of Islamic law, this decision reflects the values of al-‘adl (justice), al-maslahah (public interest), and al-musawah (equality), and illustrates the Court's role as a modern embodiment of wilayah al-mazalim.
Pembebanan Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Sebagai Mitigasi dalam Kontrak Pembiayaan Perbankan: Kajian UU No 4 Tahun 1996 dan UU No. 21 Tahun 2008 Syaddan Dintara Lubis; Fauziah Lubis; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
Case Law : Journal of Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Case Law : Journal of Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Program Pasca Sarjana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/caselaw.v7i2.5772

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji peran strategis pembebanan jaminan Hak Tanggungan sebagai instrumen mitigasi risiko dalam kontrak pembiayaan pada perbankan konvensional dan perbankan syariah di Indonesia. Sistem perbankan ganda menghadapi tantangan hukum dan operasional yang berbeda dalam menjamin hak kreditur sekaligus memberikan perlindungan yang adil bagi debitur berdasarkan paradigma kontraktual masing-masing. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan pembebanan Hak Tanggungan dalam kontrak kredit dan pembiayaan syariah, menganalisis perbedaan mendasar menurut UU No. 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan dan UU No. 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah, serta mengidentifikasi isu-isu spesifik yang memengaruhi kepastian hukum, orientasi eksekusi, dan kesesuaian prinsip keadilan dalam kedua sistem. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan statute comparative yang sistematis dan terstruktur. Bahan hukum primer mencakup kedua undang-undang, peraturan pelaksana, serta doktrin yurisprudensial yang relevan, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder berasal dari literatur hukum otoritatif yang dianalisis menggunakan teknik kualitatif untuk menghasilkan konstruksi argumentasi yang logis dan berbasis regulasi. Hasil penelitian menegaskan bahwa Hak Tanggungan berfungsi sebagai instrumen mitigasi risiko yang esensial dalam kedua sistem perbankan, namun memiliki karakter hukum dan orientasi eksekusi yang berbeda. Perbankan konvensional menitikberatkan pada kepastian eksekusi dan kekuatan eksekutorial, sementara perbankan syariah menempatkan jaminan sebagai penguat komitmen etis dan keadilan kontrak dengan parameter eksekusi yang lebih fleksibel. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan model eksekusi jaminan yang berimbang, yang mengintegrasikan kepastian hukum dan prinsip keadilan berbasis syariah guna meningkatkan efektivitas perlindungan hak kreditur dan debitur secara proporsional.
Legal Protection for Advocates as Human Rights Defenders: An Analysis of Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates in Indonesia Eka Putra Zakran; Achyar Zein; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.15247

Abstract

The Indonesian Advocates’ Code of Ethics and Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates recognize advocates as members of an officium nobile and guarantee their professional independence in performing their duties as law enforcement officers and human rights defenders. However, the increasing incidence of intimidation, violence, and criminalization against advocates reveals a persistent gap between the legal protections guaranteed by law and their implementation in practice. Although advocates play a pivotal role in protecting human rights and ensuring access to justice, limited research has examined the effectiveness of Indonesia’s legal framework in safeguarding their professional independence through legal protection and the enforcement of the Code of Ethics. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing legal framework in protecting advocates as human rights defenders, with particular emphasis on professional independence and the enforcement of the Indonesian Advocates’ Code of Ethics. The research adopts a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The analysis is based on Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates, the Indonesian Advocates’ Code of Ethics, relevant human rights instruments, and the case of the acid attack against advocate and human rights defender Andrie Yunus. The findings indicate that, despite formal legal guarantees of professional independence, the current framework remains ineffective due to weak institutional coordination, inconsistent law enforcement, and inadequate enforcement of the Code of Ethics. These shortcomings expose advocates to intimidation and violence, limiting their ability to perform their professional responsibilities independently. The study concludes that strengthening legal protection requires regulatory reform, more effective enforcement of the Code of Ethics, stronger institutional collaboration, and comprehensive protection mechanisms. These measures are essential to safeguarding advocates’ independence, improving access to justice, and reinforcing human rights protection in Indonesia.
JARIMAH ZINA, PELECEHAN SEKSUAL DAN PEMERKOSAAN DALAM PIDANA ISLAM, HUDUD, KEDUDUKAN SAKSI DALAM PERKARA ZINA: PERBANDINGAN ANTARA QONUN NO. 4 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG JINAYAH DAN UU NO. 21 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KUHP Zainal Abidin; Rina Feriana; Ramadhan Syahmedi; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, September 2026
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/qanun.v5i1.1440

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang jarimah zina, pelecehan seksual, dan pemerkosaan dalam perspektif hukum pidana Islam, serta menganalisis kedudukan saksi dalam perkara zina dan melakukan perbandingan antara Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat di Aceh dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Nasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan komparatif dan analisis konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa zina dalam hukum Islam didefinisikan sebagai hubungan seksual di luar pernikahan sah yang termasuk dalam kategori jarimah hudud dengan sanksi yang telah ditentukan secara tegas dalam Al-Qur'an dan hadis. Pembuktian zina mensyaratkan empat orang saksi laki-laki yang adil, atau pengakuan pelaku, yang mencerminkan prinsip kehati-hatian dalam penegakan hukum Islam. Pelecehan seksual dan pemerkosaan dalam perspektif Islam juga mendapat perhatian serius dengan sanksi yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai hudud, ta'zir, atau bahkan hirabah tergantung pada tingkat kejahatannya. Perbandingan antara Qanun Jinayat Aceh dan KUHP Nasional menunjukkan perbedaan paradigmatik yang signifikan, dimana Qanun Jinayat menerapkan prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam secara lebih substantif dengan sanksi cambuk dan rajam, sementara KUHP Nasional mengkonstruksikan zina sebagai delik aduan dengan pendekatan yang lebih restriktif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa diperlukan pendekatan integratif yang mampu mengharmonisasikan nilai-nilai normatif hukum Islam dengan prinsip-prinsip hukum positif dalam kerangka Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia, dengan tetap memperhatikan perlindungan hak asasi manusia, keadilan substantif, dan kemaslahatan masyarakat.
TINDAK PIDANA BERBASIS DIGITAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DAN MAQĀṢID AL-SYARĪ‘AH: PROBLEMATIKA PERLINDUNGAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL DI ERA SOCIETY 5.0 Darmawan Darmawan; Arifuddin Muda Harahap; Ramadhan Syahmedi; Mhd. Yadi Harahap
QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): QANUN: Journal of Islamic Laws and Studies, September 2026
Publisher : ASIAN PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58738/qanun.v5i1.1615

Abstract

Era Society 5.0 telah mengubah karakter kejahatan melalui munculnya tindak pidana berbasis digital yang menantang paradigma hukum pidana konvensional. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis konstruksi hukum pidana digital di Indonesia, khususnya relasi normatif antara KUHP Nasional, UU ITE, dan prinsip perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara, serta menawarkan arah reformulasi hukum yang lebih berkeadilan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan filosofis melalui perspektif hak asasi manusia serta maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah. Kajian ini menemukan bahwa regulasi tindak pidana digital Indonesia masih menghadapi persoalan disharmonisasi norma, perluasan kriminalisasi, dan potensi multitafsir dalam penerapan hukum. Kondisi tersebut berimplikasi terhadap keseimbangan antara kebutuhan keamanan siber dan jaminan kebebasan berekspresi, privasi, serta hak atas informasi. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa pembangunan hukum pidana digital tidak cukup diarahkan pada penguatan aspek represif, tetapi harus berbasis prinsip legalitas, proporsionalitas, due process of law, dan perlindungan hak digital. Reformulasi hukum siber Indonesia perlu dibangun melalui sistem regulasi yang integratif, responsif, dan berorientasi pada kemaslahatan manusia. Perspektif maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah memperkuat gagasan bahwa hukum digital harus menjamin perlindungan kehormatan, keamanan, kebebasan, dan martabat manusia sebagai tujuan utama hukum.
Co-Authors Abd. Mukhsin Achyar Zein Ahmad Fadhly Roza Arifuddin Muda Harahap Bismar Siregar Budi Sastra Panjaitan Cahaya Permata Darmawan Darmawan Dimas Ginastian Eka Putra Zakran Fauziah Lubis Haris Dermawan Iwan Iwan Muhammad Fitri Adi Munawir Harahap Nurasiah Ramadan Syahmedi Siregar Ramadhan Syahmedi Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar Regina Wydya Prameswari Rina Feriana Siti Nazar Sukiati Sukiati Syaddan Dintara Lubis Zainal Abidin