Khafifatul Fian
UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

PENDEKATAN FILOLOGI EDWAR DJAMARIS DAN CHARLES J. ADAMS DALAM KAJIAN ISLAM PENUH RAHMAT Khafifatul Fian; Ali Muhdi
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): Desember
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM BANI FATTAH (IAIBAFA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/tafaqquh.v10i2.1125

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze philological approach perspectives of Edwar Djamaris and Charles J. Adams, how the history of the development manuscript studies and philological science, and how the implementation of philological approaches in Islamic studies. The type of research used is literature review through data collection techniques by searching for sources from books or articles that researchers analyze descriptively analytically.  The results showed that the proximity philology according to Edwar Djamaris in terms of concept or term is almost the same as described by Charles J. Adams, except that in his review it can be said to be slightly different.  Edwar Djamaris is more about philology that is literary in nature or ancestral heritage, while Charles J. Adams is more about texts containing Islamic teachings. The historical development of manuscript studies and philological science is divided into five periods: the Iskandariah, Roman, Renaissance, Middle Eastern, and Indian Schools. The application of the philological approach in   Islamic studies is found in the interpretation sources of Islamic law, as the researcher explained regarding the interpretation of the Quran Surat Lukman: 17 and implementation in terms of the relationship between philological studies and Islamic studies rahmatan lil'alamin.
KOMPARASI KEHUJJAHAN HADITS DHA’IF PERSPEKTIF IMAM ABU HANIFAH DAN IMAM AHMAD BIN HANBAL Khafifatul Fian; Munawir Munawir
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Vol. 11 No. 1 (2023): Juni
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM BANI FATTAH (IAIBAFA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/tafaqquh.v11i1.1169

Abstract

This study aims to explain the hadith dha'if by comparing the thoughts of Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. The type of research used is a literature review through data collection techniques by tracing sources either from articles, books, or other sources relevant to the topic of discussion. After the data is collected, the researchers descriptively analyze and the next step is to conclude. The results showed that on the thought of Imam Abu Hanifah related to the hadith dha'if it is permissible to practice it for something related to the practice or law of sharia and with the provision that the level is not very weak and there are no other postulates that have conflicts with the hadith. Meanwhile, according to Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, it is the same as his thought that Imam Abu Hanifah to allow for the use of hadith dha'if with provisions on discussions related to Practice but not something that discusses the law.