Articles
<![CDATA[Assessing Indonesia-Russia Foreign Policy During Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono Administration ]]>
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL Volume 17, Issue 1, Year 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (998.803 KB)
|
DOI: 10.14710/jis.17.1.2018.1-20
<![CDATA[Russia or formerly known as the Soviet Union has a historically unique cooperation and diplomatic relations with Indonesia. This is because the relationship between Indonesia and Russia has a long history and experiencing ups and downs. The closeness of the two countries was influenced ideologically in the early days of Indonesian independence, and later the rise of the New Order regime influenced the dynamics of Indonesian foreign policy. During the New Order period, the Indonesian government began to freeze all forms of cooperative relations with the Soviet Union. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War era began to change the map of international politics to affect the situation in Indonesia. In the Post-Reformation era, the normalization of relations between the two countries recovered and lasted until the administration of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono. The purpose of this article is to find out how the changes in the implementation of the foreign policy of Indonesia-Russia during the administration of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono with the previous era and what factors underlie Indonesia's foreign policy towards Russia. This research uses the descriptive-analytical method and using some theoretical concepts in the foreign policy-making process. The results of this study concluded that foreign policy between Indonesia and Russia increased significantly in the Post-Reformation era which no longer saw Russia as a threat as in the New Order era. The cooperation between Indonesia and Russia is implemented in various main areas, prominently is the cooperation in the field of military, social, economic and political.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Guidelines for the Development of Measures to Combat Counterfeit Drugs WHO 1999 di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Bunga Lutfiana Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Ika Riswanti Putranti]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i4.17598
<![CDATA[The globalization era, which now has increasingly removed the interstate's barrier, is not solely positive. One of the negative impacts which has occurred is the inevitable dissemination of counterfeit drugs across the world. Thus, the counterfeit drugs issue has become a common problem of international society and has to be tackled together. The discourse on the issue and technical countermeasures are relentlessly sought by WHO along with its member countries until the creation of Guidelines for the Development of Measures to Combat Counterfeit Drugs (GDMCCD) in 1999. The guidelines were formulated for harmonizing member countries' efforts in the most systematic and effective way in tackling counterfeit drugs dissemination. In this thesis, Indonesia as one of the WHO member countries, abides and implements the guidelines. This thesis will discuss about the motives behind Indonesia's GDMCCD 1999 implementation into governmental system and municipal law while the guideline is merely a recommendation. Through the neoliberalism perspective, which is rich in the explanation about self-interest in international cooperation, this research provides explanatory analysis about Indonesia's interest in the guidelines implementation. The result of this research finds that Indonesia has distributed the vision and mission of GDMCCD into national regulations and Indonesia has interest-based motives. National interest (economic benefits, political supports, and information) and common interest (human security, transnational crime, and transaction cost) are the main motives of Indonesia in the implementation.]]>
<![CDATA[Pemberian Grasi oleh Pemerintah Indonesia kepada Narapidana Kasus Narkoba Schapelle Corby ]]>
<![CDATA[Citra Nadia]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i3.21066
<![CDATA[This study describes the pardon granted by the Government of Indonesia to Corby underthe Government of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in the case of drug crimes committed bySchapelle Leigh Corby, and explains the reasons of Indonesia under the administration ofPresident Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono in granting clemency to Corby. The method used inprocessing the data is by qualitative method, by analyzing the data of the identifiedmaterial sources, such as interviews, international agreements, and other sources such asscholarly documents, articles, journals, or scientific writing on similar themes with thisresearch. The concept in this study explains that bilateral cooperation in achieving thenational interest of each country is very influential on foreign policy applied by state actors.It also affects Indonesia and Australia in cooperating. International cooperation is a toolfor international relations actors whose function is to facilitate and serve a variety ofunlimited activities. Foreign Policy has a national importance for a country and is anobjective of the national Government at the international level. Governments within acountry, of course, have a goal to promote and prosper the country by making policies andconnecting with other countries. The Indonesian government grants clemency toAustralian citizen inmates involved in narcotics case Schapelle Leigh Corby on an interestbasis. Corby was found guilty of having found 4.2 kilograms of brutto or 4.1 kilograms netin his surfboard satchel at Ngurah Rai airport, Bali on October 8, 2004. Corby's grant wasmade on the basis of the Government of Indonesia's wishes and interests to Australia.]]>
<![CDATA[EFEKTIFITAS INTERNATIONAL WHALING COMMISSION (IWC) DALAM PERBURUAN LUMBA-LUMBA ‘TAIJI DRIVE HUNT’ DI TAIJI JEPANG 2013 – 2017 ]]>
<![CDATA[Addien Mirza Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 2, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i2.23719
<![CDATA[Dolphin hunting, or commonly called 'Taiji Drive Hunt' which is done massively in Taiji Region, Wakayama Prefecture, Japan occurred every year. Present the role of the IWC as an International Organization that can regulate the hunting of dolphins belonging to the cetacean’s category. Based on this background, the formulation of the problem that arises is "how effective is the organization of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in the case of dolphin hunting in Taiji Japan?". This research aims to examine the effectiveness of the IWC which can also be said as an international regime that focuses on hunting cetaceans especially dolphins in 2013 to 2017. The results of this research are that state behavior is very crucial and culminates in the level of compliance within IWC organization, as well as the ambiguity in the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (ICRW) which causes misinterpretation among IWC members. In dealing the challenges of the effectiveness of IWC in the future, the author has several suggestions regarding cetaceans hunting, so that IWC further enforce the rules which have been previously agreed, so this organization can become better in carrying out their duties and functions. As for suggestions for the Japanese Government, it is expected to use a humane hunting method by not using dangerous tools in carrying out hunting practices for cetaceans, chiefly dolphins.]]>
<![CDATA[Kebijakan Pemerintah Jerman Menangani Peningkatan Angka Kriminalitas Pencari Suaka sebagai Dampak dari Open Door Policy ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhmmad Al Ghifari]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 3, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i3.21178
<![CDATA[Germany is one of the favorite destinations for immigrants and asylum seekers seeking help because of the open door policy that began to be implemented in August 2015. This policy opens German borders for asylum seekers fleeing the wars that occurred in the Middle East such as Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Waves of asylum seekers are increasingly flooding Germany. This policy then began to have an impact, one of which began to increase the number of crimes committed by asylum seekers in Germany. The German government then issued a new policy to handle the impact that arose from previous policies by launching the StarthilfePlus aid program. This study finds that policies implemented to cope with the impact of open door policies that have previously been implemented are not yet effective. The ineffectiveness of this policy is due to the two objectives that not yet achieved yet. First, there are no increased in migrants voluntarily returning to their home country. Secondly, the increasing number of failed asylum seekers residing in Germany compared with before the policy was implemented.]]>
<![CDATA[Celah Kejahatan dalam Relasi Pangan-Manusia Studi Kasus Ndrangheta dalam Kejahatan Pangan di Italia ]]>
<![CDATA[Nadita Anisa Ningrum]]>;
<![CDATA[Hermini Susiatiningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v1i1.19135
<![CDATA[Food crime in the form of food product fraud especially in fraudulent olive oil commodities frequently occurred in the period 2014 to 2017 in Italy. The estimated profit gained by organized crime groups reaches millions of euros. Italian agriculture has finally become the focus of mafia's Ndrangheta involvement in the food chain. This research is aimed to find out why the Ndrangheta group committed food crime in Italy and to analyzed the Ndrangheta group as transnational organized crime group. The Ndrangheta group in the Italian food crime scheme is puzzling as to why human-food relations bring up the Ndrangheta group to commit food crimes in Italy. In response to this phenomenon, this thesis used the concept of transnational organized crime groups and non-traditional security concepts, with qualitative methods. The results showing that the presence and characteristics of the Ndrangheta group, the socio-economic conditions of the Calabria region and the facilitative system encouraged food crime take place in Italy. Also extreme power of Ndrangheta made them worse to be controlled. Therefore multilateral cooperation is needed in the form of institutions or regimes that can press for the urgency of food crime, pursue strategies in deterring and detecting the existence of organized crime groups.]]>
<![CDATA[EFEKTIVITAS KERJASAMA WWF INDONESIA – BBSKDA RIAU DALAM MEMERANGI PERDAGANGAN ILEGAL GADING GAJAH SUMATERA DI PROVINSI RIAU 2010-2015 ]]>
<![CDATA[Philippe Bangun]]>;
<![CDATA[Ika Riswanti Putranti]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 3, Nomor 4, Tahun 2017 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v3i4.17595
<![CDATA[Illegal ivory trade crime is an environmental issue that threatens the elephant’s population in the world, one of them is Sumatran elephant. In Riau Province, the Centre of Sumatran Elephant Conservation, illegal ivory trade still took place and often conducted by riding the human – elephant conflict that was one of the main threats of Sumatran Elephant’s population. Relatively easy access to Southeast Asian’s country from Riau Province has led the crime to be classified as transnational crime because of its impact to other countries. Responding the issue, WWF Indonesia established a cooperation with BBKSDA Riau in an effort of Sumatran elephant conservation in 2010 and extended in 2015. The goal of this research is to know how effective is WWF Indonesia and BBKSDA Riau’s cooperation on combating illegal Sumatran elephant ivory trade in Riau Province in 2010-2015. In order to answer that question, this research uses concepts that are: International Organization, International Cooperation, Environmental Crime and Effectiveness. The method that being used in this research is mixed methods with descriptive type by using data collecting technique which are interview, literature reviews and questionnaire. The result from this research is that the effectiveness of WWF Indonesia – BBKSDA Riau cooperation on combating illegal Sumatran elephant ivory trade in Riau Province in 2010-2015 is less effective due to its lack of significance towards addressing the issue.]]>
<![CDATA[PERAN INTER PARLIAMENTARY UNION (IPU) TERKAIT ISU PELANGGARAN HAM ETNIS ROHINGYA PADA MASA PEMERINTAHAN SIPIL MYANMAR TAHUN 2011-2016 ]]>
<![CDATA[Dian Yumansarie]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 5, Nomor 2, Tahun 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v5i2.23630
<![CDATA[IPU is the international organization of parliaments, that makes IPU the only international organization in the world whose members consist of a national parliament from a sovereign country. This makes the role and scope of IPU interesting to see, in this case its about human rights violations during the civilan government in Myanmar. The civilan government made the system of checks and balances to work, where the parliament was active again to conduct surveillance of the government which had never occurred under its military regime. This research gives a new color because so far the resolution of Rohingya-related cases has never been done with a legislative approach.This research aims to explain the extent of the role of IPU in dealing with human rights violation against the Rohingya in Myanmar under the civilian government 2011-2016. The method used in this research is a qualitative method with the type of analytical-descriptive research through literature. The results of this research are that IPU does not have a big role in efforts to protect the human rights violation against the Rohingya in Myanmar because of three main factors, namely: (1) IPU seems to be less aggressive and limiting the scope of its activities, (2) Internal problems possessed by IPU, and (3) Internal barriers resulting from domestic conditions in Myanmar.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisa Meningkatnya Kasus Food Piracy dalam Fenomena Italian Sounding ]]>
<![CDATA[Audi Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Ika Riswanti Putranti]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i2.20335
<![CDATA[Italian food product is a very popular product in the world and this fact leads to a largenumber of counterfeiting cases to these products. This can be seen from the large amountof profit reaching 30 billion Euro and ascend to 60 billion Euro. This research aim todetermine the cause of the increasing case of food piracy in the Italian Soundingphenomena in spite of the Italy’s numerous effort in handling this case. This research usesTransnational Organized Crime theory which will then be continued by usingneoliberalism view in the form of International Cooperation theory, InternationalInstitution theory, and International Regime theory. The method used for this research isqualitative with explanative research type. This research proves that the cause of this casecontinues to increase is the lack of awareness from Italy and other countries regarding thiscase which leads to the lack of international cooperation initiative in respond to foodpiracy in the Italian Sounding phenomena case.]]>
<![CDATA[Kerjasama Keamanan Maritim Indonesia-Australia dalam Menangani IUU Fishing di Laut Arafura ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Edrian Ekaputra]]>;
<![CDATA[Hermini Susiatiningsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Marten Hanura]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of International Relations Diponegoro Volume 4, Nomor 2, Tahun 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Relations, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/jirud.v4i2.20133
<![CDATA[IUU (illegal, unreported, unregulated) fishing was deemed by Indonesia as a crime thatinflicted many loss. In Indonesia, IUU fishing mostly occured at Arafura Sea whereAustralian sea territory were partially included. The mentioned problems in this researchare why Indonesia and Australia establish a cooperation to deter IUU fishing at Arafurasea and the affects. The purpose of this research is to explain and analyse the cooperationthat undertaken by Indonesia and Australia to deter IUU fishing at Arafura Sea. For thosepurposes, this research using the liberalism theory, cooperation concept, maritime securityconcept and transnational crime concept as a tool of analysis. This research is conductedby using the qualitative research method with explanative research type through interviewsand literature studies. The cooperation between Indonesia and Australia to deter IUUfishing at Arafura Sea were conducted through bilateral an multilateral efforts. For bothstates, particulary Indonesia, the cooperation are the part of their efforts to create amaritime security with the protection of economic and reliability sector of respective statesas the ultimate goal.]]>
